The port censused focus-record alpha over its own export -- 34 elements, 2
varying, both `ptbtn00f` -- and concluded there is nothing to fix. That is
correct and correctly scoped. This asks the same question of the whole disc.
1 130 focus records, 2 664 timed elements, 210 with a varying alpha. 202 have
`rest()` returning the PEAK, the `ui-settle-time` pathology. By pak:
PILOTLOG 116, MOVIE_THEATER 54, HANGAR_ARSENAL 30, LEADERBOARD 8, GP_TITLE 2.
So the port's 2 is right because GP_TITLE has 2. The scope was load-bearing
and was not stated as a limit -- "only 2 have a varying alpha" reads as a fact
about the format and is a fact about one pak. The pathology is concentrated in
exactly the screens a wider port reaches next.
The 8 LEADERBOARD ones are the worse mode. `py_ranking_btn01f` swings
255->127->255 with no two adjacent keyframes equal, so `rest()` falls through
to its longest-dwell rule and returns 244 -- neither the peak nor the trough.
A glow stuck at its peak is visibly wrong; one stuck at 244 of a 127..255
range looks entirely plausible and nothing reports it.
Verified rather than asserted: two hits dumped keyframe by keyframe, and a
control on `ptbtn01f`, which is genuinely constant across its cycle and is
correctly NOT flagged. `py_ranking_btn01f` also confirms the loop-length
decode independently -- its ramp ends at t=90 inside a declared 120-unit
cycle, holding bright for 30 units.
Reach stated: 210 is a floor. Focus records are matched by the `Xf.rat` name
rule, and elements with constant alpha but varying scale, rotation or
position have the same problem and are not counted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QsEPXWVaEpyfudtR6re1Pd
f9638a05cf