re: partial field map inside the live definition object, and why the automation failed

Anchoring on a unit whose disc record sets a field locates it in the live object:
Size_X/Y/Z (+0x30/34/38) and HP (+0x54) confirmed across five capital ships and
the player fighter; +0x74 (0.8) and +0x84 (0.97) are probable ThrusterRatio and
ResistanceParalyze but rest on a single anchoring unit; +0x40 varies per unit and
is unidentified.

live_offsets.rs automates the correlation and currently produces one hit which is
false -- YawDragFactor 2.0 collided with the integer 2 at +0x0c stored as a
denormal. Causes recorded: get_f32 is unreliable on default-heavy IDXD records
because the value-before-key pairing shifts, and 96 words only reaches +0x180
while RadarRange/FCSRange sit beyond it. Next run dumps 512 words.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

crates/sylpheed-formats/examples/unit_fields.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+//! Every key/value a named unit record actually sets on disc.
+//!
+//! The live definition object in guest RAM has no field names; to find where a
+//! field like `HQRatio` sits inside it, anchor on a unit whose disc record DOES
+//! set that field and look for the value. This prints those anchors.
+//! Run: unit_fields <disc-root> <substring of ID>...
+use sylpheed_formats::idxd::IdxdObject;
+use sylpheed_formats::pak::PakArchive;
+
+fn main() {
+    let disc = std::env::args().nth(1).expect("disc root");
+    let want: Vec<String> = std::env::args().skip(2).collect();
+    let pak = PakArchive::open(format!("{disc}/dat/GP_MAIN_GAME_E.pak")).expect("pak");
+    for entry in pak.entries() {
+        let Ok(bytes) = pak.read(entry) else { continue };
+        let Ok(obj) = IdxdObject::parse(&bytes) else { continue };
+        let Some(id) = obj.get_raw("ID") else { continue };
+        if !want.iter().any(|w| id.contains(w.as_str())) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        println!("=== {id}   (schema {:08x})", obj.schema_hash);
+        // The pool interleaves VALUE before KEY (see the module docs), so the
+        // pairs read (t[i] = value, t[i+1] = key).
+        let t = obj.tokens();
+        let mut i = 0;
+        while i + 1 < t.len() {
+            println!("    {:<30} {}", t[i + 1], t[i]);
+            i += 2;
+        }
+    }
+}