fix(mesh): winding consistency replaces the connectivity heuristic
Gate attribution put connectivity behind 153 of 225 misses -- the largest blocker, and the gate already known to reject a capture-proven block. Testing it against winding consistency (an objective topology signal: ~1.0 or ~0.0 for a real mesh, ~0.5 for a mis-carve) shows a floor of 0.70 with connectivity inert dominates the previous default on both axes: 6212 resources decoded (+143) with 39 shared inconsistencies (-17), capture oracle unchanged at 46/46, twin invariant clean, coverage invariant intact. Suite green. The 0.80 cliff (5770 resources, 0 inconsistent) is documented, not taken -- consistency is the weaker witness, and both points are one env var apart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ file offset vcount candidate claimed by our decode ou
|
||||
0x1a0befc 2296 yes f101_bdy_03(2296) f101_bdy_03 f101_bdy_03 @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1a22c1c 7694 yes f101_eng_01(7694) f101_eng_01 f101_eng_01 @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1be5df4 628 yes f101_wep_01_m(628) f101_wep_01_m f101_wep_01_m @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1bf40f4 261 yes e_rob_f001(24), _rou_f105_break(261), e_rou_f106(24), e_rou_f302_barrel(24), e_rou_f302_base(24), e_rou_f303_barrel(24), e_rou_f303_base(24), e_rou_e007_Far(24), e_rou_e007_Near(24), e_rou_e010_Far(24), e_rou_e010_Near(24), e_rou_e105(24), e_rou_e105_wep_01(24), e_rou_e106(24), e_rou_e106_eng(24), e_rou_e106_wep_02_01(24), e_rou_e106_wep_02_joint(24), e_rou_e108_Missile_open(24), e_rou_e201(24), e_rou_e302_barrel(24), e_rou_e302_base(24), e_rou_e303_barrel_Near(24), e_rou_e303_base_Near(24), e_rou_e501(24) f106_eng_01_l e_rob_f001 @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1bf40f4 261 yes e_rob_f001(24), e_rou_f003_Near(24), e_rou_f101_wep_01(24), e_rou_f105(24), _rou_f105_break(261), e_rou_f106(24), e_rou_f302_barrel(24), e_rou_f302_base(24), e_rou_f303_barrel(24), e_rou_f303_base(24), e_rou_e007_Far(24), e_rou_e007_Near(24), e_rou_e010_Far(24), e_rou_e010_Near(24), e_rou_e105(24), e_rou_e105_wep_01(24), e_rou_e106(24), e_rou_e106_eng(24), e_rou_e106_wep_02_01(24), e_rou_e106_wep_02_joint(24), e_rou_e108_Missile_open(24), e_rou_e201(24), e_rou_e302_barrel(24), e_rou_e302_base(24), e_rou_e303_barrel_Near(24), e_rou_e303_base_Near(24), e_rou_e501(24) f106_eng_01_l e_rob_f001 @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1bf596c 2446 NO _rou_f105_break(2446) f105_bdy_01_m _rou_f105_break @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1c03ebc 1960 NO _rou_f105_break(1960) f105_bdy_02_m _rou_f105_break @ -0x0
|
||||
0x1c0f67c 82 NO _rou_f105_break(82) e106_wep_02_01_l _rou_f105_break @ -0x0
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user