# ✅ How a built-in's result reaches a condition — the operand chain The previous iteration named the branches and stated plainly that this was still missing: *"naming the branch does not by itself give the clear condition — that needs the operand chain feeding each compare."* It is read now, and it closes. ## ⚠️ First: the corpus already had half of it, and I had written the stale file [`isl-bytecode.md`](isl-bytecode.md) — which **owns** the opcode table — already named ops 21–24 (`push.i` / `push.f` / `pop.i` / `pop.f`) and ops 13–18 as the six branches. My own [`isl-branches.md`](isl-branches.md), written one iteration earlier, said `op23` and `op21` were unread. **The stale file was mine.** Verified rather than assumed, from the thunks and handlers: | op | moves | verified by | |---|---|---| | 21 `push.i` | `[phase+168]` → deque at `phase+44` | thunk: `addi r4,r30,168` / `addi r3,r30,44` | | 22 `push.f` | `[phase+184]` → deque at `phase+64` | thunk: `addi r4,r30,184` / `addi r3,r30,64` | | 23 `pop.i` | → `[phase+168]` | handler `0x82271C30`, only r3-offset touched is **168** | | 24 `pop.f` | → `[phase+184]` | handler `0x82271CB8`, only r3-offset touched is **184** | With `isl-bytecode.md`'s operand-kind table (`special[0] = [phase+164]`, `special[1] = [phase+168]`), `pop.i` lands in **`special[1]`**. ## ✅ The built-in table is a thin dispatch layer over a vtable Each of the 147 entries is a **stub**, not an implementation. The stub resolves the `local[]` argument base and tail-calls a fixed slot of the `ScriptPhase` vtable at `[phase+0]`: ``` 82272DFC addi r3, r31, 20 ; local[] base 82272E00 bl 0x82454A40 ; resolve 82272E04 lwz r11, 0(r31) ; the vptr 82272E10 lwz r11, 184(r11) ; <- fixed slot, one per built-in 82272E14 b 0x822724F0 ; mtspr CTR / bcctrl, then return 0 ``` Measured over all 147: | | count | |---|---| | dispatched through a `ScriptPhase` vtable slot | **112** | | write `[phase+164]` (`special[0]`) inline in the stub | 17 | | write `[phase+184]` inline | 0 | **Every named predicate is in the vtable group** — `unit_state` 184, `unit_alive` 188, `hp_pct_test` 64, `dist_lt` 56, `unit_hp_pct` 256, `is_engaged` 252, `group_ratio_pct` 196, `timer_elapsed` 372, `player_gauge0/1_test` 396/400 — which is the control: the split is not arbitrary, it separates engine queries from script-local bookkeeping. ## ✅ The vtable is at `0x820A84BC`, derived self-checkingly Not guessed from a stride — the trap this corpus already paid for. Derived from a **known implementation**: 1. `isl-bytecode.md` documents built-in **39** `MARK_LAST_PHASE` as `[phase+300] = 2`. 2. The function `0x8226B498` is exactly `addi r11,r0,2 ; stw r11,300(r3) ; blr`. 3. It appears as a data word at exactly **one** address: `0x820A8570`. 4. Built-in 39's stub uses slot **180** → base = `0x820A8570 − 180` = **`0x820A84BC`**. **The check, which was not used in the derivation:** built-in **40** `mark_not_last` (`[phase+300] = 1`) uses slot **176**, so the base predicts `0x820A84A8`… and slot 176 holds `0x8226B4A8`, which is `addi r11,r0,1 ; stw r11,300(r3) ; blr` — the `= 1` stub sitting immediately after the `= 2` one. Predicted and confirmed. **Third, independent:** the database's own `vptr_writes` lists `0x820A84BC` as a vtable, written at `0x82261B80`. ## ✅ And the result lands in `special[0]` `unit_state` is slot 184 → **`0x8226ADF0`**. It indexes `[phase+324]` — the unit array `isl-builtins.md` already documents — by `local[4]`, reads the record, and writes its answer to **`[phase+164]` = `special[0]`** at both its normal exit (`0x8226AEC4`) and its early exit (`0x8226AF48`). That completes the chain, and the phase-3 poll loop now reads end to end: ``` call unit_state(ADT308) ; result -> special[0] pop.i ; special[1] <- the pushed comparand cmp.i special[0], special[1] beq -> 0xFEB4 ; loop back while they are equal ``` **A built-in's return value is `special[0]`; the comparand is popped into `special[1]`; the compare and branch do the rest.** That is the shape of every clear condition in the corpus. ## 🟡 Not settled * **The other 111 vtable slots are not read.** The base is now known, so each is a lookup rather than a search — but knowing where `hp_pct_test` lives is not the same as having read it. * **Which comparand each site pushes.** The loop above compares against whatever `push.i` put on the deque; recovering that per site needs the push tracked through the decode, which `isl.py` does not do. * **The 35 non-vtable built-ins**, and `op21`/`op22`'s generic deque helpers (`0x82175C20`, `0x82274BA0`), were not read — only their arguments. * ~~**The vtable's length.**~~ ✅ **SETTLED (2026-08-27): 113 slots (0…112).** ## ✅ (2026-08-27) The class is `silph::SilphScriptPhase`, the vtable is 113 slots, and there is a SECOND one The MSVC RTTI locator sits at `vtable[-1]`. At **`0x820A84B8`** it is `0x8210DDC0`, whose type descriptor `0x8289CD18` spells **`.?AVSilphScriptPhase@silph@@`** — so the class is named, not inferred. The vtable **ends at `0x820A867C`, 113 entries**. The terminator is not "a non-code word" — a scan on that rule runs straight past the end, which is why an earlier pass reported "≥200 slots, no non-code word in the first 200". The real terminator is **the next class's COL**: `0x820A8680` holds `0x8210DD74`, and a second vtable begins at `0x820A8684`. **Cross-check, independent of the RTTI:** the 147 built-in stubs between them reference **109 distinct slots, minimum 0, maximum 110** — every one inside 0…112. A wrong length would have stubs pointing past the end. ### The second class: `silph::SilphScriptPhaseDemo` `0x8210DD74` → type descriptor `0x8289CCC0` = **`.?AVSilphScriptPhaseDemo@silph@@`**, vtable at `0x820A8684`, **also 113 slots**. It **overrides 109 of the 113**, and the overwhelming majority point at a single shared stub, `0x8226C160`. So the Demo phase implements almost none of the script surface — it keeps a handful of real methods (slot 15 → `sub_82391BA8`, slot 111 `Update` → `sub_82275800`, slot 112 → `sub_8237EF08`) and stubs the rest. 🔑 That explains a loose end from [isl-timers](isl-timers.md): the stopwatch advance `sub_822710D0` has **two** callers, `sub_82263408` and `sub_82275800`. They are the two classes' `Update` methods — same slot 111, base and derived. ### And both "unread spawner callers" are placed `isl-coroutine-spawner.md` lists `sub_82273910` and `sub_82264058` as unread callers of the spawner. They are a **matched pair**: | | slot | class | |---|---|---| | `sub_82264058` | **0** | `SilphScriptPhase` | | `sub_82273910` | **0** | `SilphScriptPhaseDemo` | Slot 0 in this ABI is the scalar deleting destructor, so these are the two classes' teardown paths — not two separate mysteries. 🟡 *Why* a destructor reaches the spawner is not read here. ## ✅ (2026-08-27) A script load builds TWO phase objects, not one Each vtable constant is materialised at exactly **two** sites — its constructor and its destructor — and `vptr_writes` agrees: | class | ctor | dtor | |---|---|---| | `SilphScriptPhase` | `sub_8225FEF8` (`0x8225FF28`) | `sub_82261B60` | | `SilphScriptPhaseDemo` | `sub_82260568` (`0x82260660`) | `sub_82260FF8` | ⚠️ **A wrong turn worth recording.** `sub_8225FEF8`'s *only* caller is `sub_82260568`, which looks exactly like "base ctor called from derived ctor" — i.e. **every phase is a Demo**. That would make the built-in dispatch inert, since the Demo vtable no-ops almost everything. Reading the constructor kills it: `sub_82260568` **allocates and builds two separate objects.** ``` 822605C8 bl 0x82150EF8 ; allocate 10216 bytes <- object A 822605EC bl 0x8225FEF8 ; SilphScriptPhase ctor on A … 82260658 bl 0x822700C0 ; the sibling initialiser on B 82260660 addi r11, r11, -31100 ; 0x820A8684 82260664 stw r11, 0(r29) ; Demo vptr onto B 82260690 stw r29, 8(r30) ``` Both get the same four arguments. They land at **`Y+4` (the main phase)** and **`Y+8` (the demo phase)** — which is why the load path read earlier resolves the ScriptPhase through `Y+4`. *A constructor calling another class's constructor is not proof of inheritance; check which object each vptr lands on.* 📏 The allocation is **10216 bytes**, consistent with the highest field this corpus has read, `[phase+10160]`. ### ✅ There are THREE classes, not two — the base is `SilphScriptPhaseBase` `sub_8225FEF8` opens by calling `sub_822700C0`, which stamps **its own** vptr `0x820A8E44`; `sub_8225FEF8` then overwrites it with `0x820A84BC`. That *is* the derived-constructor pattern, on one object. `0x820A8E44`'s COL gives **`.?AVSilphScriptPhaseBase@silph@@`**, and it is **113 slots** like the other two. ``` silph::SilphScriptPhaseBase 0x820A8E44 ctor sub_822700C0 ├── silph::SilphScriptPhase 0x820A84BC ctor sub_8225FEF8 └── silph::SilphScriptPhaseDemo 0x820A8684 ctor inlined in sub_82260568 ``` The Demo object is built by calling the **base** ctor and stamping the Demo vptr, which is why `sub_822700C0` appears on both paths — and why the two objects are separate allocations rather than one. 🔑 The base ctor is also what stores the load's kind argument (`or r26, r7, r7` → `stw r26, 152(r30)`). That field is now identified as a **0-based stage index** — see [isl-condition-builtins](isl-condition-builtins.md). ## ✅ What the Demo vtable's overrides actually are: no-ops The 109 overridden slots point at three shared stubs, and all three do nothing: ``` 8226C160 stw r11(=0), 164(r3) ; special[0] = 0 ; return 822748B8 stw r10(=0), 164(r11) ; r3 = 0 ; same, and return code 0 822748A8 lfd f0, 25600(0x820B) ; stfd f0, 176 ; [phase+176] = 0.0 ``` It keeps only four real methods: slot 15 → `sub_82391BA8`, **slot 111 `Update` → `sub_82275800`**, slot 112 → `sub_8237EF08`, and its destructor. 🟡 **What a "Demo" phase is — a reading, from the corpus's own vocabulary.** `DEMO` is one of the **eight cutscene text families** already decoded here (`MSG_DEMO___` — see [isl-message-dialogue-link](isl-message-dialogue-link.md) and the movie↔subtitle work), so "demo" means *cutscene* in this codebase. A second phase object, built from the same script load, with every gameplay built-in stubbed to a no-op and only `Update` alive, reads as **the cutscene script runner**. Stated as a reading: nothing here shows it executing cutscene bytecode. 🔑 **A new handle on the stalled `X+12` question.** The Demo class's single construction site is inside `sub_8225EC78` (the script load): `sub_82260568(Y, r26, [X+12])` at `0x8225ED5C` — the kind is passed **straight into the constructor as its third argument**, alongside `[r30+12]` again at `0x822605E8` and `0x82260654`.