The capital-ship row still said placement was the open question. Today's work
says otherwise: placement is sound (hull static-exact, cross-id mounting is 2
pairs across 335 ships) and the user-reported "ships assemble wrong" is an XBG7
mis-decode instead. The row now says that and points at the backlog and the mesh
doc, and keeps the one-way-test problem visible.
SESSION-2026-08-11.md summarises the run for review, leading with the single item
that needs the user's decision (editing save slot 01, deliberately not done) and
separating findings, the two disc defects found, and the process notes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude (auto-RE)
140856b3f9