Files
Syplheed-Reborn/crates/sylpheed-formats/examples/slab_screen.rs
Claude (auto-RE) 85ad540a7e re: the other four ships are clean; automating the slab check failed
Rendered f101/f105/f106/e105 statically -- all coherent, no stray masses, so the
e106 slab was specific. slab_screen.rs tries to automate the check by comparing
each part's min-axis extent to its ship median, but it produces identical flags
with and without the coverage fix at both 4x and 2.5x: it never sees
e106_bdy_03, the part it was built for. The eye used relationship (a mass apart
from the hull), not scale; a containment test is the right analogue and is not
built. Kept for what it does show: f002_bdy_22's 100000-unit tether and
t901_e01_D's mast are legitimate, and capture-verified f101_bdy_01 flags at 6x.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 07:22:43 +00:00

75 lines
3.1 KiB
Rust
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
//! Screen every ship family for a part that is wildly out of scale with its
//! siblings — the "slab" signature of a mis-anchored block.
//!
//! Rendering `e106` found such a part (`bdy_03`, 600×1600×998 beside parts of
//! ~250) that coverage, cross-container consistency, the capture oracle and the
//! twin invariant were all blind to. Eyeballing does not scale to 166 containers;
//! this does the same comparison numerically.
//!
//! Usage: slab_screen <resource3d_dir> [factor]
use sylpheed_formats::mesh::Xbg7Model;
use sylpheed_formats::ship::{is_base_part, ship_id_of};
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
fn main() {
let dir = std::env::args().nth(1).expect("resource3d dir");
let factor: f32 = std::env::args().nth(2).and_then(|s| s.parse().ok()).unwrap_or(4.0);
let mut files: Vec<_> = std::fs::read_dir(&dir)
.unwrap()
.flatten()
.map(|e| e.path())
.filter(|p| p.extension().and_then(|s| s.to_str()) == Some("xpr"))
.collect();
files.sort();
let mut flagged = 0usize;
for f in &files {
let Ok(bytes) = std::fs::read(f) else { continue };
let mut by_ship: BTreeMap<String, Vec<(String, f32)>> = BTreeMap::new();
for m in Xbg7Model::anchor_models_cancellable(&bytes, 0.0, &|| false) {
if !is_base_part(&m.name) {
continue;
}
let Some(id) = ship_id_of(&m.name) else { continue };
let (mut lo, mut hi) = ([f32::MAX; 3], [f32::MIN; 3]);
for s in &m.meshes {
for q in &s.positions {
for k in 0..3 {
lo[k] = lo[k].min(q[k]);
hi[k] = hi[k].max(q[k]);
}
}
}
if lo[0] == f32::MAX {
continue;
}
// Compare the part's SMALLEST axis span, not its diagonal. A long
// thin part (an antenna, a 100 000-unit tether on `f002`) is
// legitimately huge in one axis and would swamp a diagonal test; a
// mis-anchored block is bulky in all three, which is what the e106
// slab looked like (600×1600×998 beside siblings of ~250).
let thin = (hi[0] - lo[0]).min(hi[1] - lo[1]).min(hi[2] - lo[2]);
by_ship.entry(id.to_string()).or_default().push((m.name.clone(), thin));
}
for (id, parts) in &by_ship {
if parts.len() < 3 {
continue; // no meaningful median
}
let mut d: Vec<f32> = parts.iter().map(|(_, x)| *x).collect();
d.sort_by(|a, b| a.partial_cmp(b).unwrap());
let median = d[d.len() / 2];
for (name, diag) in parts {
if *diag > median * factor {
flagged += 1;
println!(
"{:<22} {name:<22} min-axis {diag:>8.0} vs ship median {median:>8.0} ({:.1}×)",
f.file_name().unwrap().to_string_lossy(),
diag / median
);
}
}
}
}
println!("{flagged} parts flagged at {factor}× the ship median");
}