Inverting the question -- read what an unreached routine DOES, rather than testing another candidate mechanism -- sharpened this a lot without solving it. The metric was partly inflated. Of 24901 unreached instructions in 564 runs, 458 runs are length 1, and 111 of those are a lone `ret` stranded after an end_coroutine, with the next routine being a properly seeded entry. Stage 02's first two "unreached routines" are exactly that. But those are only 458 instructions: the real gap is 24443 in 106 runs, the largest 1526 (Stage 26), 1496 and 1481 (Stage 29), 1069, 904. And it is live mission logic. Stage 26's 1526-instruction run stages arguments and calls builtin57(ADN110, 1) and set_group_speed(ADN110, 2, 0) -- named units, named built-ins. New this iteration: kill_coroutine (built-in 5) is confirmed as a code-offset carrier, which is what the corpus said -- its local[0] resolves 150/150 onto the instruction stream against a 34.0% control, values 13740..221048. And, like the others, it points at zero unreached run-starts. That is now five mechanisms. Across 2757 code references -- start_coroutine 1765, the phase timeline 675, built-in 19's trigger handlers 79, kill_coroutine 150, and the 0x1883 records 88 -- not ONE lands on an unreached run-start. A categorical absence, not a near miss. Not a tool artefact: 1765 of 1765 start_coroutine sites resolve with 0 missed, 0 entries land outside their phase region, and 0 are discarded by the on-stream filter. Combined with the earlier result that an unreached routine's offset appears nowhere in the file as a word in any encoding, these routines are referenced by nothing inside the .ssb. Either they are unused in this build, or they are entered from outside it. A 1526-instruction routine driving a named squadron sits badly with "unused", but that discomfort is not evidence and the two readings are recorded without choosing. No static test I have devised can decide it; a runtime probe logging sub_822737C8's third argument through a mission would. All artefacts regenerate byte-identical; documentation only.