Reading builtin80's body (0x82268460) to name it: it is NOT a predicate. It allocates a 20-byte object, stamps vtable 0x820A8CB0, magic 0xAB0311BA and the unit's live object into it, pushes it onto a queue via the same helper push.i uses, and returns 1 -- or 0 when the unit is absent. A command. That made the conditions listing impossible: it showed a six-way switch `if builtin80(TCT206) == 0 … == 5` on a function returning 1 or 0. Disassembling the site shows two unconditional `jmp`s between the call and the compare, so 0x1B6C0 is reached ONLY by a branch and its special[0] has nothing to do with builtin80. op12 is unconditional -- the next instruction is never reached by fall-through -- and the tracker walked through it exactly as it had walked through end_coroutine. Last iteration I fixed the instance and not the class, leaving 22x more bad sites in place than the fix removed. A/B over all 28 stages, 7563 sites, resetting at jmp as well: sites whose operands change 889 (11.75%) LHS unresolved, before -> after 34 (0.45%) -> 756 (10.00%) So the previous commit's headline "0.0% unresolved" was a MISSING CHECK, not a strong result: the linear walk always had some value to report, and reporting it was the bug. 10% is the honest figure and the other 90% is trustworthy for a reason. Also corrected: isl-unit-args.md illustrated its diff with 0x1B6C0, which is one of the bogus sites. The UNIT_ARG result itself stands -- it came from reading implementations, not from this listing -- but the example was picked from bad output. Not done, and said so: recovering the 756 needs a dataflow join over each block's actual predecessors, a CFG fixpoint rather than a linear pass. The branch targets are all known so the CFG is available; the analysis is not written. calls and phase-ends regenerate byte-identical; conditions changes on 187 lines.
7.6 KiB
✅ Every condition site, with its comparand — the clear conditions are readable
This is what the whole ISL chain was for. data/isl-stage02-conditions.txt has
existed for a long time as a stale artefact with no generator —
isl_report.py's own docstring says so. It has one now, and the conditions are
resolved rather than printed as special[N].
✅ The deque ops are an expression stack
isl-bytecode.md names ops 21–24 push.i/push.f/pop.i/pop.f over deques
at phase+44 / phase+64. What they are used for is the missing piece:
set.i special[0] = 1
set.i special[1] = special[0]
push.i ; save the comparand
set.i local[0] = 1
set.i local[4] = 0x49
call unit_state(ADT308) ; result -> special[0] (clobbers it)
pop.i ; restore comparand -> special[1]
cmp.i special[0], special[1]
beq -> 0xFEB4
A textbook stack-machine lowering: push the left operand, evaluate the right, pop, compare. Tracking the stack through the decode is therefore enough to recover what every site actually tests.
The evidence it is a stack, not something else
| check | result |
|---|---|
push vs pop across all 28 stages |
1877 vs 1877 |
| files where the deque underflows or ends unbalanced | 0 of 28 |
Stage 02 pop.i sites immediately followed by cmp.i |
319 / 319 |
ops immediately preceding a pop.i |
call ×313, cmp.a ×6 |
Perfect balance with zero underflow across 28 independent files is not something
a wrong model produces, and pop.i → cmp.i at 319/319 makes pop.i a reliable
marker for a condition site.
✅ Result — disc-wide
isl.conditions() walks the linear stream tracking special[], local[] and
the stack, then reports each compare with its branch:
| all 28 stages | |
|---|---|
| condition sites | 7 563 |
| LHS honestly unresolved | 756 — 10.0 % |
| RHS is a plain number | 7 544 — 99.7 % |
🔴 The first version of this table claimed 0.0 % unresolved. That was wrong — see The correction below. ~11.75 % of the operands it reported were derived from state that leaked across an unconditional jump.
Most-tested predicates disc-wide: hp_pct_test 1955, unit_state 1257,
unit_relation 796, dist_lt 450, request_script_message 425,
unit_alive 413, read_freg 187.
And they read as conditions:
0x032F4 ph1 if unit_alive(TCN105) != 1 -> 0x3388
0x04D70 ph1 if unit_hp_pct(TCN001, Character_Player_Test) != 0 -> 0x51FC
0x2C4E0 ph3 if hp_pct_test(ADT308, 0) != 1 -> 0x2CF8C
0x30790 ph3 if dist_lt(ADT308, TCN000, 15000) != 1 -> 0x307B0
0x33FA0 ph3 if unit_state(ADT308) != 2 -> 0x34030
0x349E0 ph3 if unit_state(ADT308) == 1 -> 0x34A00
dist_lt(ADT308, TCN000, 15000) — with the world unit established as 1 metre,
that is a 15 km proximity test.
✅ FIXED — and the cause was not what I expected
The first version of this listing showed end_coroutine as the left-hand
side of 34 comparisons disc-wide (15 in Stage 02). That is impossible —
end_coroutine returns no value a script can test — and an impossible output is
the bug reporting itself.
🔴 The obvious fix is REFUTED
The plan recorded here was "set special[0] only for built-ins that write
[phase+164]". That would not have worked: end_coroutine's handler
0x82272624 is
addi r11, r0, 1
addi r3, r0, 3
stw r11, 164(r31) ; it DOES write [phase+164]
so the filter would have kept it. Checking the handler before writing the filter is what caught this.
✅ The real cause: a coroutine boundary
end_coroutine returns 3, which destroys the thread. Execution does not
continue past it — so the instructions that follow it in the flat stream
belong to a different routine, and every value the tracker was carrying is
stale. The linear walk that makes this decode possible at all is precisely what
walks across that boundary.
Resetting the tracker at end_coroutine:
| A/B over all 28 stages, 7563 sites | |
|---|---|
| sites whose operands change | 34 — 0.45 % |
LHS end_coroutine before → after |
34 → 0 |
| left as an explicit unknown afterwards | 34 — 0.45 % |
The two counts are equal, so the leak was confined to exactly the sites that
displayed the impossible value — the other 7 529 conditions were never
affected. Those 34 now print
<unknown: reached after a coroutine boundary> rather than a wrong answer.
🟡 They are recoverable but not recovered. The right-hand side of each is
still exact; only the left is lost. Resolving them means seeding the tracker at
each coroutine entry rather than walking in from the previous routine, and
the entries are available — start_coroutine's target is staged slot 0. Not
done.
🟡 Not settled
- The 35 unnamed built-ins still print as
builtinN—builtin103(115 sites),builtin105(117) andbuiltin16(132) are the highest-traffic unknowns, and each is now a vtable-slot lookup away. - Which condition guards each
END_PHASE. Every site is readable, but linking a condition to the phase exit it eventually reaches needs the control flow between them, which this listing does not follow. - Only Stage 02's artefact is committed; the other 27 generate from the same command but are not in the tree.
🔴 The correction — I fixed the instance, not the class
The end_coroutine fix above was too narrow, and the giveaway was again an
impossible output: the listing showed
if builtin80(TCT206) == 0 … == 1 … == 2 … == 3 … == 4 … == 5
a six-way switch on a built-in that returns only 1 or 0. Reading
builtin80's body (0x82268460) settles that it is not a predicate at all — it
allocates a 20-byte object, stamps a vtable 0x820A8CB0, a magic 0xAB0311BA
and the unit's live object into it, pushes it onto a queue via the same helper
push.i uses, and returns 1, or 0 when the unit is absent. It is a command.
Disassembling the site explains it:
01B698 call builtin80(TCT206)
01B6A4 set.i global[76] = 0
01B6B0 jmp -> 0x1B738
01B6B8 jmp -> 0x1B738
01B6C0 cmp.i … <- reached ONLY by a branch from elsewhere
Two unconditional jumps sit between the call and the compare. op12 is
unconditional, so the next instruction is never reached by fall-through — and
the tracker walked straight through it, exactly as it had walked through
end_coroutine. One is a thread boundary and the other a block boundary, but
they are the same defect: a linear walk cannot carry state across a point where
control does not flow.
| A/B over all 28 stages, 7563 sites | |
|---|---|
sites whose operands change once jmp also resets |
889 — 11.75 % |
| LHS unresolved, before → after | 34 (0.45 %) → 756 (10.00 %) |
So the earlier "0.0 % unresolved" was not a strong result, it was a missing check: the walk always had some value to report, and reporting it was the bug. 10 % is the honest figure, and the remaining 90 % is now trustworthy for a reason — the state reaching those sites really does flow there.
🟡 Recovering the 756 needs real dataflow. Each is a block entered only by a
branch, so its state is the join over its actual predecessors — a fixpoint over
the CFG, not a linear pass. The branch targets are all known ([phase+232] + word@+4), so the CFG is available; the analysis is not written.
Method note worth keeping: when the same defect appears twice, fix the class.
Patching end_coroutine alone left 22× more bad sites in place than it removed,
and only another impossible-looking output exposed them.