bebdb18a02
The handoff had Q3 as "runtime-solved only". It is not: the layer key at +0x0A of the T8aD sprite header, stable-sorted, is a file-derivable paint order, already checked against five measured orders and already driving the compositor for every build on the disc. That answer had simply never reached the page the port agent reads. The new evidence is EXTRAS -- the first screen composited from the rule alone and scored against a framebuffer capture the rule had never seen. 0.9620 at zero shift, against a same-tooling control of 0.9657 on the screen the rule was fitted to. Written down with its limit rather than its headline: align_to_capture correlates edges, and a paint-order change moves blends, not edges, by =<45/255 on a few per cent of pixels. So the score is evidence for placement and only CONSISTENT with the order. The sharp A/B needs a rebuild and is named in the doc instead of being claimed.