fa20db3db8
96, 97, 98 and 104 were unnamed. Measured over all 28 stages they form a
family that appears nowhere outside the six tutorials:
96 8 sites S18-S23 only
97 38 sites S18-S23 only, followed by start_coroutine 27/38
98 0 sites never called anywhere
104 39 sites S18-S23 only, followed by wait_s 39/39,
preceded by end_coroutine 37/39
104's adjacency is a textbook poll loop with no exceptions: coroutine starts,
tests the predicate, waits, repeats.
96's operand is the giveaway. Its eight payloads in stage order are
S18 -> 101, 102, 103; S19 -> 201; S20 -> 301; S21 -> 401; S22 -> 501;
S23 -> 601, i.e. (stage - 17) * 100 + section. Tutorial 1 has three sections
and the other five have one each, and the tutorial index is encoded in the
argument.
Names are deliberately NOT applied. tutorial_begin / tutorial_end /
tutorial_message_pending fit the shape, and [phase+340]/[phase+344] are said
to carry the state and payload, but I have not read that handler myself and
this file has already had to withdraw five names guessed from shape. The
distribution and the argument encoding are established and are what a port
needs; the labels can wait for someone to read the code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE