handoff: VSync/event-wedge fixes + iterate 2.A–2.BC research notes

Source changes (dormant parity infra, retained from iterate 2.AI/2.AO):
- xenia-kernel/exports.rs: nt_create_event manual_reset polarity +
  related event wiring
- xenia-gpu/mmio_region.rs: D1MODE_VBLANK_VLINE_STATUS hardcode parity

Also lands the audit-runs/ analysis notes (.md/.txt/.json digests) for the
iterate 2.x VSync/0x10e8/0x1004 wedge investigation. Raw trace dumps
(.jsonl/.gz/.csv/.stdout) and agent worktrees (.claude/) are gitignored as
regenerable local artifacts — see memory + HANDOFF for the running findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
MechaCat02
2026-06-05 07:19:08 +02:00
parent acd1656753
commit ef93a4fa14
620 changed files with 108303 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
# Phase C+24 — escalation summary
## Headline
The 105,286 first-divergence is **NOT** a guest control-flow branch. It
is a **scheduler-cadence divergence**: ours fires the first VSYNC
graphics-interrupt callback (`sub_824be9a0`, armed via
`VdSetGraphicsInterruptCallback`) immediately after `VdSwap.return` at
`cycle=5,584,980`, inserting 6 events (KeAcquire / KeRelease pair).
Canary fires the SAME interrupt body with the SAME `r3=0` (VSYNC)
argument, but ~80ms wall-clock later, at idx 106,805. Both engines
execute the SAME guest code path; only the timing of the first VSYNC
interrupt delivery differs.
## Why escalation (per tripstone #5)
- ours uses `tick_vsync_instr` (guest-instruction-count threshold,
150k) to pace VSYNC; canary uses a dedicated host frame-limiter
thread on wall-clock (`Clock::QueryGuestTickCount`).
- Aligning the two would require either adopting wall-clock pacing in
the lockstep diff harness (invalidates 23 phases of digest stability)
or pinning first-VSYNC to a guest-instruction landmark (requires
engine + canary changes).
- A naive 6-event diff-tool absorber realigns for 24 events then
re-diverges (canary: `MmFreePhysicalMemory` vs ours:
`KeEnterCriticalRegion`); chain of downstream timing-induced
divergences would each need separate analysis. Risks reading-errors
#23 and #32.
- MEMORY.md (review_a_boot_state_2026_05_21) explicitly defers
"scheduler-determinism" alongside audio/HID/XAM.
## Per-chain delta
| chain | C+23 baseline | C+24 outcome | delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| main (canary tid=6 → ours tid=1) | 105,286 | 105,286 | 0 |
| sister 11/32/4/41/16 | (unchanged) | (unchanged) | 0 |
## New cold digest
NONE captured — no engine change, no re-run.
## Next target (post-C+24)
Methodology pivot to scheduler-determinism (separate phase, NOT C+25).
Three options written up in `investigation.md` §"Recommended next
action". Until then, the matched-prefix is effectively capped at
105,286 by VSYNC-cadence offset; further C+nn progression on guest
logic alone will not advance the main chain past this point without
first resolving the cadence issue.
## Files
- `investigation.md` — full analysis (this dir)
- NO source files touched.
- NO test edits.
- NO diff-tool edits.
- Phase B image hash `ea8d160e…` UNCHANGED.
- xenia-kernel tests 226 PASS (unchanged).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
# Phase C+24 — post-VdSwap KeAcquireSpinLockAtRaisedIrql divergence
**Date:** 2026-05-26
**Mode:** READ-only investigation. NO engine change, NO diff-tool change, NO test change.
**Status:** ESCALATED (scheduler-determinism deferred class).
## TL;DR
The post-C+23 first divergence at canary `tid=6` ↔ ours `tid=1` idx
105,286 is **NOT a control-flow branch chosen by guest state**. It is a
**scheduling-cadence divergence**: ours fires the first VSYNC graphics
interrupt callback EARLIER than canary, inserting 6 extra events
(`KeAcquireSpinLockAtRaisedIrql` + `KeReleaseSpinLockFromRaisedIrql`,
×3 events each) into ours's tid=1 stream between `VdSwap.return` and
`VdGetCurrentDisplayGamma`. Canary fires the SAME interrupt path with
the SAME r3=0 (VSYNC) argument, just at a different wall-clock /
trajectory point. Per tripstone #5 (escalation when divergence
requires scheduler-determinism resolution), C+24 lands NO change. Main
matched-prefix stays at 105,286.
## Event-context capture (Step 1)
### Pre-context (5 matched events)
Both engines bit-identical:
```
import.call VdGetSystemCommandBuffer
kernel.call VdGetSystemCommandBuffer
kernel.return VdGetSystemCommandBuffer
import.call VdSwap
kernel.call VdSwap
kernel.return VdSwap
```
### Divergent event
```
canary[105293]: import.call VdGetCurrentDisplayGamma (ord 441)
ours [105286]: import.call KeAcquireSpinLockAtRaisedIrql (ord 77)
```
### Post-divergence flow (ours)
```
ours[105286-105288]: import/call/return KeAcquireSpinLockAtRaisedIrql
ours[105289-105291]: import/call/return KeReleaseSpinLockFromRaisedIrql
ours[105292-105294]: import/call/return VdGetCurrentDisplayGamma ← realigns with canary[105293-105295]
```
### Streams re-converge at offset +6 in ours
After the 6 extra ours events, both streams call **the same** import
sequence: `VdGetCurrentDisplayGamma → VdSetDisplayMode → VdGetCurrentDisplayInformation
→ VdQueryVideoFlags (returns 3, per C+23) → VdQueryVideoMode → ...`. So
the 6 events are an **inserted block in ours**, not a permanent
trajectory split.
But **secondary divergences appear ~24 events later**: ours's
post-block stream diverges from canary again with
`canary: MmFreePhysicalMemory` vs `ours: KeEnterCriticalRegion` at
offset +24. This pattern of "absorb-realign-diverge" repeats; a simple
6-event absorber would expose a chain of downstream divergences, each
needing separate analysis.
## LR localisation (Step 2)
Ran ours with `--branch-probe=0x8284e1ec` (the KeAcquire import thunk).
**First fire** at `cycle=5584980, lr=0x824bea14, r3=0x42453918` — same
cycle as the divergent event's `guest_cycle=5584999`. Caller PC =
`lr - 4 = 0x824bea10`, inside function **`sub_824be9a0`**.
Cross-reference in `sylpheed.db`: `sub_824be9a0` has **zero `bl`
callers** in the static disasm — it's NOT called directly by guest
code. It IS the **graphics interrupt callback** armed via
`VdSetGraphicsInterruptCallback(0x824be9a0, ctx)` per
`crates/xenia-kernel/src/exports.rs:4101` and confirmed in 10+ audit
logs.
## Function body of `sub_824be9a0` (the guest ISR)
```ppc
0x824be9a0 mfspr r12, LR
0x824be9a4 bl __savegprlr_29
0x824be9a8 stwu r1, -128(r1)
0x824be9ac or r31, r4, r4 ; r4 = user_data (ISR arg2)
0x824be9b0 cmpli cr6, 0, r3, 0x1 ; r3 = ISR source (arg1)
0x824be9b4 bc eq, 0x824BEA30 ; r3 == 1 → counter path
; --- r3 != 1 (i.e. r3 == 0, VSYNC) path: spinlock + bit-clear ---
0x824be9b8 lwz r10, 10772(r31)
... ; load dispatch fn pointer
0x824be9f0 mtspr CTR, r30 ; first guest-handler dispatch
0x824be9f4 bcctrl
0x824be9f8 lbz r10, 268(r13) ; per-CPU IRQL
0x824bea08 or r3, r30, r30
0x824bea0c slw r29, r11, r10
0x824bea10 bl 0x8284E1EC ; KeAcquireSpinLockAtRaisedIrql
0x824bea14 lwz r11, 0(r31)
... ; clear pending-IRQ bit
0x824bea28 bl 0x8284E1DC ; KeReleaseSpinLockFromRaisedIrql
0x824bea2c b 0x824BEAAC ; → epilogue
; --- r3 == 1 path: counter / no spinlock ---
0x824bea30 cmpli cr6, 0, r3, 0x0
0x824bea34 bc eq, 0x824BEAAC ; r3==0 already handled above
0x824bea38 addis r11, r0, 0x7FC8 ; load D1MODE_V_COUNTER MMIO
0x824bea3c lwz r11, 25924(r11)
... ; counter update + optional callback
0x824beaa4 mtspr CTR, r11
0x824beaa8 bcctrl
0x824beaac epilogue
```
## Cross-reference to canary's source
`xenia-canary/src/xenia/kernel/xboxkrnl/xboxkrnl_video.cc:303-310`:
```cpp
void VdSetGraphicsInterruptCallback_entry(function_t callback,
lpvoid_t user_data) {
// callback takes 2 params
// r3 = bool 0/1 - 0 is normal interrupt, 1 is some acquire/lock mumble
// r4 = user_data (r4 of VdSetGraphicsInterruptCallback)
...
}
```
So per canary's own comments:
- `r3=0` (VSYNC / "normal interrupt") → guest takes the spinlock path
- `r3=1` ("acquire/lock mumble", presumably the CP-interrupt) → guest takes the counter path
In **both engines**, ours and canary, when the first VSYNC fires after
VdSwap, the callback is invoked with `r3=0` and the spinlock path
executes. **The only difference is timing.**
## Per-engine VSYNC dispatch model
### Ours
- `kernel.interrupts.tick_vsync_instr(instruction_count)` accumulates
instructions; fires VSYNC when `vsync_accumulator >= 150_000`.
- `try_inject_graphics_interrupt` runs every scheduler round; injects
the queued VSYNC into the first Ready (else Blocked) HW thread.
- Lockstep / diff-harness path uses `tick_vsync_instr` (not wall-clock).
- Net effect: ours fires VSYNC ~every 150k guest instructions ≈ every
scheduler round once instruction count grows; the FIRST VSYNC is
delivered right after VdSwap returns because that's when tid=1
becomes Ready and `is_in_callback==false`.
### Canary
- A dedicated host thread `frame_limiter_worker_thread_`
(`graphics_system.cc:148-237`) calls `MarkVblank()`
`DispatchInterruptCallback(0, 2)``EmulateCPInterruptDPC(callback,
data, source=0, cpu=2)`.
- Wall-clock paced via `Clock::QueryGuestTickCount()` vs
`vsync_duration_d = 16.67 ms` (60 Hz).
- First MarkVblank fires after at least 16.67 ms wall-clock from
frame-limiter thread creation.
- The callback runs on whichever XThread is current at dispatch time
(not tid-locked).
## Empirical counts (sanity)
| engine | total KeAcquire calls | first KeAcquire idx | first KeAcquire host_ns |
|---|---|---|---|
| canary | 16,000 | tid=6 idx 106,805 | 1,731,840,900 (~1.73 s) |
| ours | 32 | tid=1 idx 105,286 | 1,437,632,028 (~1.44 s) |
Canary's first VSYNC interrupt fires ~80 ms after canary idx 105,286
(host wall-clock from canary log) — i.e. canary's tid=6 has time to
make ~1,500 more events before the first interrupt arrives. Ours's
first VSYNC arrives RIGHT at idx 105,286.
The total-count gap (16,000 vs 32) is largely a runtime-window
artifact: canary ran 90 s of wall-clock; ours ran ~1.5 s of guest
time before wedging at the C+22 cap (downstream). Within ours's
runtime window, the *rate* of vsync delivery is similar to canary's;
the issue is the OFFSET of the first delivery.
## Class triage
| class | description | applies? |
|---|---|---|
| A | Different LR → different caller, real control-flow branch | NO — LR identical, function identical, both engines take the SAME `r3=0` path |
| B | Same LR / computed call with different fn pointer | NO — bl to fixed import thunk |
| C | Game-state-dependent (state polled, branch taken) | NO — the branch in `sub_824be9a0` is on the ISR's `r3` arg, which is `0` (VSYNC) in BOTH engines |
| D | Phase A coverage gap | NO — events are accurately captured |
**Actual class: scheduler-cadence divergence.** The 6 events are not
in the "main thread's compute" stream; they're in an
**interrupt-context insertion** that ours delivers at a different
wall-clock moment than canary.
## Why this is NOT a candidate for an engine-side fix
1. **Tripstone #5**: investigation reveals scheduler-determinism
issue → STOP and report.
2. **MEMORY.md** explicitly lists "scheduler determinism" in the
deferred bucket (review_a_boot_state_2026_05_21 entry: "Deferred:
audio/HID/XAM/scheduler-determinism/diff-tool-canonicalization").
3. The two engines have **fundamentally different VSYNC clock
sources**: ours's `tick_vsync_instr` uses guest-instruction counts,
canary's `frame_limiter_worker_thread_` uses host wall-clock. To
align ours's first-vsync moment with canary's would require either:
- Adopting wall-clock pacing for the lockstep diff harness
(invalidates 23 phases of digest stability, per Phase D
forensics' explicit warning), or
- Calibrating the instruction-count threshold per cold run
(non-deterministic, defeats the diff-harness's purpose).
4. The natural-progression goal is to fix REAL game-logic bugs.
Forcing this specific VSYNC moment to align would mask the actual
scheduler-determinism problem rather than resolve it.
## Why this is NOT a candidate for a diff-tool absorber (at this layer)
A naïve 6-event absorber (`absorb KeAcquire + KeRelease pair if
canary doesn't have one at the same position`) would advance the
matched-prefix past idx 105,286, but **only by 24 events** before
the next, different divergence: canary's `MmFreePhysicalMemory` vs
ours's `KeEnterCriticalRegion` at the +24 offset. The chain
`absorb-realign-diverge` repeats. Each downstream divergence will
need its own analysis. Adding an absorber here without first
characterizing the downstream divergences risks:
1. **Reading-error #23 crossover** (band-aid masks real divergence).
2. **Reading-error #32 inflation** (timing-window absorbers should be
narrow; this one would fire on every VSYNC-driven cadence offset).
3. **Spurious main-prefix advancement** that hides multiple genuine
issues downstream.
The Phase D D-extension absorber (nested-CS-cleanup) was a
**narrow, exhaustively-characterized** band-aid for a specific cap;
this VSYNC-cadence shape lacks that characterization.
## Recommended next action
ESCALATE to a dedicated scheduler-determinism methodology pivot
(reading-error #32 / phase-c23-scheduler-determinism-plan refresh).
Options:
1. **Adopt wall-clock vsync in lockstep** under a feature flag, accept
non-determinism in the diff harness, treat matched-prefix as a
noisy metric — re-baseline all Phase C+nn caps.
2. **Pin first-VSYNC delivery** to a guest-instruction landmark common
to both engines (e.g. first `kernel.return VdSwap` on
`VdSetGraphicsInterruptCallback`'s registered callback). Requires
engine-side coordination + canary patch.
3. **Build a VSYNC-cadence-aware absorber** that absorbs
interrupt-callback-induced event sequences on BOTH sides up to
alignment landmarks. Requires characterizing the full set of
guest-ISR shapes — `sub_824be9a0` is one of N callback bodies the
absorber must recognize.
All three options are out-of-scope for C+24 per the original task's
escalation rule.
## Files inspected (read-only)
- `xenia-rs/audit-runs/phase-c23-VdQueryVideoFlags/diff-jitter-1.md`
(predecessor diff report)
- `xenia-rs/audit-runs/phase-a-diff-harness/schema-v1.md` (schema /
absorber inventory; v1.7)
- `xenia-canary/src/xenia/kernel/xboxkrnl/xboxkrnl_video.cc:303-310,
438-523` (`VdSetGraphicsInterruptCallback_entry`, `VdSwap_entry`)
- `xenia-canary/src/xenia/gpu/graphics_system.cc:148-237, 352-374`
(frame_limiter_worker, MarkVblank, DispatchInterruptCallback)
- `xenia-canary/src/xenia/kernel/kernel_state.cc:1365-1405`
(`EmulateCPInterruptDPC`)
- `xenia-rs/crates/xenia-kernel/src/interrupts.rs` (full file —
InterruptState, tick_vsync_instr, tick_vsync_wallclock)
- `xenia-rs/crates/xenia-app/src/main.rs:2440-2474, 3700-3812`
(vsync ticker + injector)
- `xenia-rs/crates/xenia-kernel/src/exports.rs:4086-4108`
(`vd_set_graphics_interrupt_callback`)
- `xenia-rs/sylpheed.db` (xrefs, instructions on
`sub_824be9a0`/`sub_824ce4d0`/`sub_824cea80`)
## Files touched (changed)
NONE. C+24 is read-only investigation.
## Test suite
xenia-kernel: **226 PASS** (unchanged from C+23 baseline). No code
edits, no test additions.
## Phase B `image_canonical_sha256`
Pinned hash `ea8d160e…` UNCHANGED — no XEX loader changes.
## Cascade
| | predicted | actual |
|---|---|---|
| A capture event context | 95% | **PASS** |
| B classify (A/B/C/D) | 75% | **PASS** (none of A/B/C/D — fifth class: scheduler-cadence) |
| C identify root cause | 60% | **PASS** (ours vsync_instr_period mistimed vs canary wall-clock frame-limiter) |
| D land fix or clean escalation | 65% | **PASS — clean escalation** |
| E main > 105,286 | 55% | **N/A — no engine change** |
## Tripstones honored
1. Reading-error #28 — verified canary semantics by reading
`xboxkrnl_video.cc:303-310` directly; the r3=0/1 contract is
documented in canary's own source comments. NOT assumed.
2. Reading-error #23 — explicitly chose NOT to land a downstream-
risky absorber/fix. Main matched-prefix stays at 105,286.
3. Reading-error #31 — no fresh canary run made; used the C+23
archived jitter set. State of `cache/` + `cache_host/` unchanged.
4. Reading-error #32 — the cause IS scheduling-jitter on the
interrupt-cadence axis. Confirmed by the empirical
first-acquire-host-ns table above.
5. Escalation rule — TRIGGERED. Root cause requires
scheduler-determinism methodology pivot, deferred per MEMORY.md.
6. `--mute=true` — N/A this session (one `xrs-c23 exec` probe run
for `--branch-probe` capture; no canary run).