Priority aging in xenia-cpu/scheduler.rs:pick_runnable
(effective_priority = base + age_bonus(now_round - last_run_round),
capped at +31, AGING_ROUNDS_PER_BONUS=1). Strict-priority was parking
priority=0 threads behind CPU-bound priority=15 audio mixer
(sub_824D1328 guest spinwait at PC=0x824d1404 on CPU5). Aging
eventually picks the starved thread, breaking the producer-consumer
cycle that caused 5-tid wedge at PC=0x824ac578 since AUDIT-049 (10 May).
Cascade observed: tid=13 clean exit; events 121K -> 13M (107x); last
host_ns 767ms -> 51,011ms (66x); 8 new threads spawn; VdSwap 1 -> 2.
Complete two-day iterate sequence (2026-05-27 -> 2026-05-28):
- 2.F: VdSwap drain timeout 900ms -> 1ms (xenia-gpu/handle.rs); 876x
perf win on VdSwap kernel callback
- 2.H: vA0000000 physical heap bucket added (state.rs, exports.rs);
ctx_ptrs now in 0xA0000000-0xBFFFFFFF range matching canary
- 2.L: Phase-A diff harness categorized [return_value mismatch],
[status mismatch], [args_resolved.path mismatch] tags
(tools/diff-events/diff_events.py); closes reading-error #41
(silent test-harness state leak invalidating trace diffs)
- 2.M: always-on exit-thread-state.json sibling to Phase-A JSONL
(event_log.rs + xenia-app/main.rs); closes reading-error #42
(Phase-A blind to blocked-forever waits)
- 2.Q: signal.match kernel instrumentation in NtSetEvent /
NtReleaseSemaphore / KeSetEvent / KeReleaseSemaphore
(exports.rs); emits target_handle + waiter_count + waiter_tids
- 2.T: wake.requested kernel instrumentation in wake_eligible_waiters
(exports.rs); emits target_tid + transition + new_state
- 2.V: scheduler priority aging (xenia-cpu/scheduler.rs) [keystone]
Plus accumulated WIP from earlier May (contention_manifest,
phase_b_snapshot, xam/xaudio enhancements, analysis db, xex loader,
xenia-app main loop, etc.). Audit-runs/ artifacts remain untracked
per project convention.
Tests: 300 xenia-cpu / 227 xenia-kernel / 5 xenia-app / 19 xenia-path
/ 30+ smaller suites -- all PASS, 0 regressions. Determinism preserved
(2x cold runs bit-identical at 13,003,881 events post-2.V).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
address, classification, confidence, last_audit, aliases
| address | classification | confidence | last_audit | aliases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x824F7800 | normal_callee | high | 064 |
|
sub_824F7800 — dispatch caller for ANON_Class_713383D7 vtable slot 1
Synopsis
Normal callee that performs the bctrl invoking sub_825070F0 (slot 1 of the ANON_Class_713383D7 vtable at 0x8200A208). Bottom of a 4-fn linear call chain (sub_824F8398 → sub_824F7CD0 → sub_824F7800 → [bctrl] → sub_825070F0) that runs once per game-loop activation pass. AUDIT-064 verified canary fires this fn 1× at ~60s wallclock; ours fires it 0× because the entire chain sits downstream of tid=13's audit-049 wedge.
Evidence
- Disasm prolog at
0x824F7800:mflr r12; bl 0x825F0F60 (frame helper); stwu r1, -336(r1); mr r22, r3; ...— standard normal-callee prolog. NOT MSVC EH-handler shape (nosubi r31, r12, N). - Function size: 1232 bytes / 308 insns.
has_eh=False,frame_size=336. - Static caller xref: 1 —
blfrom PC0x824F8314inside sub_824F7CD0. No other refs (only.pdataentry at file offset0x1347B0— standard unwind metadata). - AUDIT-064 canary 60s probe (
--audit_61_branch_probe_pcs=0x824F7800,...): fires 1× withlr=0x824F8318 r3=BE568F00 r4=701CF5B0 r5=BCA44D40 r6=BCA44DE0on tid=6. Reproduced bit-identical at 120s and 180s wallclock. - AUDIT-064 ours
--ctor-probe=0x824F7800-n 500M: 0 fires. - The
bctrlat PC0x824F7B20(=sub_824F7800+0x320, slot 1 of0x8200A208vtable) is where sub_825070F0 is dispatched from.
Activation
Direct bl from sub_824F7CD0+0x644 (PC 0x824F8314). Both engines see the same single static caller.
Static graph
- Static callers (from
xrefs.source_func):- PC
0x824F8314insidesub_824F7CD0(the only caller).
- PC
- Callees include the
bctrlat PC0x824F7B20that dispatches tosub_825070F0via vtable slot 1 ofANON_Class_713383D7(vtable0x8200A208).
Audit log
- AUDIT-064 (2026-05-12) — disasm confirms normal-callee prolog (refutes "another EH handler" hypothesis). Canary probe fires 1× / ours 0×. Static-DB caller is the runtime caller (no surprise bctrl divergence here). The chain runs downstream of sub_822F1AA8's vtable[0] dispatch through sub_82173990 — which waits on tid=13 — so ours never reaches it because tid=13 is blocked on the AUDIT-049 wedge. [confirmed]
- AUDIT-058 (2026-05-10) — flagged as part of the static caller ladder for sub_825070F0. [confirmed at this level; ladder framing partially preserved — see sub_821B6DF4 for the EH-thunk caveat one step further up]
Open questions
- Why does the bctrl at
0x824F7B20always dispatch tosub_825070F0(slot 1 of vtable0x8200A208) at this point? Investigate where ther3instance pointer comes from — likely a class member loaded via the slot-1 ctor path ofANON_Class_713383D7. - The 4-fn linear chain (
sub_824F8398 → sub_824F7CD0 → sub_824F7800 → bctrl) is rigid and runs end-to-end without branching in canary. Confirm no early-exit branches inside the chain in ours (irrelevant if we resolve the audit-049 wedge first).
Cross-references
- Callees:
sub_825070F0via slot 1 of vtable0x8200A208atbctrlPC0x824F7B20. - Callers:
sub_824F7CD0+0x644. - Audits: 058, 064.
- Artifacts:
audit-runs/audit-064-activation-ladder/canary-{60,120,180}s.log,audit-runs/audit-064-activation-ladder/ours-500M.stdout.