fabi 0c0d5d5981 fix(deploy): give Postgres a CPU floor that Docker actually honours ...

`deploy.resources.reservations.cpus` was doing nothing. Outside Swarm, `docker compose up`
silently drops it — verified by inspecting a running container, where CpuShares, CpuQuota
and CpusetCpus were all unset while `limits.cpus` and `reservations.memory` came through as
NanoCpus and MemoryReservation. So the comment calling it "the piece that actually protects
the database" described a guarantee the box never had.

It matters on the CX22 the runbook targets: the ceilings sum to 1.2 + 0.6 + 0.5 = 2.3 on
2 vCPU, so the other services can oversubscribe the machine, and with every container on the
default weight Postgres competed on equal footing with two image resizes and an ffmpeg
poster. Replaced with `cpu_shares`, which does survive the translation — db 2048, caddy
1024, app 512, frontend 256 — so the weighting only binds when the CPU is actually
saturated, which is the moment the database must not lose.

The Caddyfile gains a 10s header-read timeout: there was no read timeout anywhere, so a
client could hold a connection, a tokio task and a `.tmp` file open indefinitely by sending
one byte a minute, and the upload sweeper is keyed on mtime precisely so a live upload never
ages out. Body reads stay unbounded — a 500 MB video over cellular legitimately takes
minutes, and a body timeout would fail exactly the uploads this product exists to collect.

.env.example documents that estimated_guest_count is a live input to the quota divisor
rather than the inert setting both it and the runbook previously implied.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-08-11 22:44:48 +02:00

12 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw