test(enabled): end-to-end route-disable journey
Close the coverage asymmetry flagged in review: script-disable had a full e2e journey but route-disable was only unit-tested (compile_routes) plus the apply-refresh path. Add an HTTP-level journey — claim a Host for the app (two-phase dispatch needs it), then serve `/hello` (200), flip the route's `enabled = false` and re-apply (404, indistinguishable from absent), and re-enable (200). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -61,6 +61,70 @@ fn disabling_a_script_makes_it_uninvocable_then_reenable() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[ignore = "needs DATABASE_URL pointing at a running Postgres"]
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn disabling_a_route_makes_it_404_then_reenable() {
|
||||
let Some(fx) = common::fixture_or_skip() else {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
};
|
||||
let env = common::admin_env(fx);
|
||||
let slug = common::unique_slug("enbl-route");
|
||||
common::pic_as(&env)
|
||||
.args(["apps", "create", &slug])
|
||||
.assert()
|
||||
.success();
|
||||
let _guard = AppGuard::new(&env.url, &env.token, &slug);
|
||||
|
||||
// The app must claim a Host before its routes are reachable (two-phase
|
||||
// dispatch: Host → app → route). A unique strict host avoids colliding
|
||||
// with other tests' instance-global claims.
|
||||
let host = format!("{slug}.test");
|
||||
common::pic_as(&env)
|
||||
.args(["apps", "domains", "add", &slug, &host])
|
||||
.assert()
|
||||
.success();
|
||||
|
||||
let dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();
|
||||
fs::create_dir_all(dir.path().join("scripts")).unwrap();
|
||||
fs::write(dir.path().join("scripts/hello.rhai"), "\"hi\"").unwrap();
|
||||
let manifest_path = dir.path().join("picloud.toml");
|
||||
let manifest = |enabled_line: &str| {
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"[app]\nslug = \"{slug}\"\nname = \"EnabledRoute\"\n\n\
|
||||
[[scripts]]\nname = \"hello\"\nfile = \"scripts/hello.rhai\"\n\n\
|
||||
[[routes]]\nscript = \"hello\"\nmethod = \"GET\"\n\
|
||||
host_kind = \"any\"\npath_kind = \"exact\"\npath = \"/hello\"\n{enabled_line}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Active → the route serves.
|
||||
fs::write(&manifest_path, manifest("")).unwrap();
|
||||
apply(&env, &manifest_path);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
route_status(&env, &host, "/hello"),
|
||||
200,
|
||||
"active route serves"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Disabled → 404, indistinguishable from absent.
|
||||
fs::write(&manifest_path, manifest("enabled = false\n")).unwrap();
|
||||
apply(&env, &manifest_path);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
route_status(&env, &host, "/hello"),
|
||||
404,
|
||||
"disabled route must 404"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Re-enabled → serves again.
|
||||
fs::write(&manifest_path, manifest("enabled = true\n")).unwrap();
|
||||
apply(&env, &manifest_path);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
route_status(&env, &host, "/hello"),
|
||||
200,
|
||||
"re-enabled route serves"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn apply(env: &common::TestEnv, manifest_path: &Path) {
|
||||
common::pic_as(env)
|
||||
.args(["apply", "--file"])
|
||||
@@ -69,6 +133,19 @@ fn apply(env: &common::TestEnv, manifest_path: &Path) {
|
||||
.success();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// GET a user route under an explicit `Host` (the claimed domain) and return
|
||||
/// the HTTP status code.
|
||||
fn route_status(env: &common::TestEnv, host: &str, path: &str) -> u16 {
|
||||
let client = reqwest::blocking::Client::new();
|
||||
client
|
||||
.get(format!("{}{path}", env.url))
|
||||
.header(reqwest::header::HOST, host)
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.status()
|
||||
.as_u16()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Resolve a script's id via the admin API (the manifest carries no ids).
|
||||
fn script_id(env: &common::TestEnv, slug: &str, name: &str) -> String {
|
||||
let client = reqwest::blocking::Client::new();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user