test/docs(cli): §3 M3 per-env approval journey; Tier 1 complete

`tests/env_approval.rs`: a `[project.environments]` gating `production` →
`pic apply --env production` refused (names --approve); `--yes` alone does not
bypass; `--approve production` applies; an un-gated `staging` applies freely.
Design doc §3 records M3 shipped and the §6/§3 group-tree Tier 1 (M1 create ·
M2 divergence/reparent · M3 per-env approval) COMPLETE.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
MechaCat02
2026-07-07 20:28:28 +02:00
parent 62710b5d81
commit e2bfe633a7
3 changed files with 103 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ mod config;
mod dead_letters;
mod email_queue;
mod enabled;
mod env_approval;
mod env_overlay;
mod extension_points;
mod group_create;
@@ -44,13 +45,13 @@ mod roles;
mod routes;
mod scripts;
mod sealed;
mod structural_divergence;
mod secrets;
mod shared_queues;
mod shared_topics;
mod shared_triggers;
mod staleness;
mod stateful_templates;
mod structural_divergence;
mod suppress;
mod tree;
mod triggers;

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
//! §3 M3 — per-env approval gating (`[project.environments]`).
//!
//! A `[project.environments]` block marks some envs confirm-required. Applying
//! to such an env with `pic apply --env <e>` is refused unless it is explicitly
//! `--approve <e>`d — and a blanket `--yes` does NOT cover it (§4.2, "CI must
//! opt in per environment"). An unlisted or `confirm = false` env applies
//! freely. The gate is client-side, so a refused apply never reaches the server.
use std::fs;
use std::path::Path;
use tempfile::TempDir;
use crate::common;
use crate::common::cleanup::GroupGuard;
/// A repo whose `[project]` gates `production` (confirm-required) but not
/// `staging`, managing one pre-existing `[group]`. Minimal per-env overlay files
/// exist so `--env` can load them.
fn gated_repo(dir: &Path, project: &str, group: &str) {
fs::write(
dir.join("picloud.toml"),
format!(
"[project]\nslug = \"{project}\"\n\n\
[project.environments]\nproduction = {{ confirm = true }}\n\
staging = {{ confirm = false }}\n\n\
[group]\nslug = \"{group}\"\nname = \"Env Gated\"\n"
),
)
.unwrap();
fs::write(dir.join("picloud.production.toml"), "# production overlay\n").unwrap();
fs::write(dir.join("picloud.staging.toml"), "# staging overlay\n").unwrap();
}
#[ignore = "needs DATABASE_URL pointing at a running Postgres"]
#[test]
fn confirm_required_env_needs_explicit_approve() {
let Some(fx) = common::fixture_or_skip() else {
return;
};
let env = common::admin_env(fx);
let group = common::unique_slug("ea-grp");
let project = common::unique_slug("ea-proj");
let _g = GroupGuard::new(&env.url, &env.token, &group);
common::pic_as(&env)
.args(["groups", "create", &group])
.assert()
.success();
let dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();
gated_repo(dir.path(), &project, &group);
let manifest = dir.path().join("picloud.toml");
let apply = |args: &[&str]| -> std::process::Output {
let mut c = common::pic_as(&env);
c.args(["apply", "--file"]).arg(&manifest).args(args);
c.output().expect("apply")
};
// production is confirm-required → a bare `--env production` is refused,
// and the message names `--approve`. (Client-side: never hits the server.)
let out = apply(&["--env", "production"]);
assert!(!out.status.success(), "production must require approval");
let err = String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stderr).to_lowercase();
assert!(
err.contains("approve") && err.contains("production"),
"the refusal must point at --approve production:\n{err}"
);
// A blanket `--yes` does NOT cover a gated env.
assert!(
!apply(&["--env", "production", "--yes"]).status.success(),
"--yes must not bypass a confirm-required env"
);
// `--approve production` lets it through.
assert!(
apply(&["--env", "production", "--approve", "production"])
.status
.success(),
"an explicit --approve production must apply"
);
// staging is `confirm = false` → applies freely, no approval needed.
assert!(
apply(&["--env", "staging"]).status.success(),
"an un-gated env must apply without --approve"
);
}

View File

@@ -824,8 +824,19 @@ reshapes the tree): `Refuse` → `ApplyError::StructuralDivergence` (422, naming
divergence (`divergence_preview` → a `structure` row: `diverged`, server + manifest parents). CLI:
`--force-local-structure` / `--adopt-server-structure` (mutually exclusive) → the `structure_mode` wire field; the
422 surfaces verbatim. A concurrent `pic groups reparent` between plan and apply still trips `StateMoved` (the tree
token folds `structure_version`). Pinned by `tests/structural_divergence.rs`. **Still deferred:** per-env approval
gating (`[project.environments]`).
token folds `structure_version`). Pinned by `tests/structural_divergence.rs`.
**§3 M3 shipped — per-env approval gating (`[project.environments]`).** A `[project.environments]` block on the
root `[project]` maps an env name to `{ confirm = bool }` (`ManifestProject.environments`, `#[serde(skip_serializing)]`
— purely CLI-side). `pic apply --env <e>` is REFUSED (client-side, before any request) when `<e>` is confirm-required
unless it is explicitly `--approve <e>`d; a blanket `--yes` does NOT cover a gated env (§4.2 "CI must opt in per
environment"); an unlisted / `confirm = false` env applies freely. `require_env_approval` gates both the single
(`run`) and tree (`run_tree`) apply paths; `--approve <env>` is a repeatable flag. Value overlays
(`picloud.<env>.toml`) already merge client-side, so this milestone is the confirm-policy gate only. Pinned by
`tests/env_approval.rs`. **Deferred (documented, not built):** server-side audited approval-override capability
(§4.2 → `authz::can`); env-as-app mapping + declarative server-side `@E` config scoping.
**§6/§3 group-tree Tier 1 (M1 create · M2 divergence/reparent · M3 per-env approval) is COMPLETE.**
---