Close the coverage asymmetry flagged in review: script-disable had a full
e2e journey but route-disable was only unit-tested (compile_routes) plus
the apply-refresh path. Add an HTTP-level journey — claim a Host for the
app (two-phase dispatch needs it), then serve `/hello` (200), flip the
route's `enabled = false` and re-apply (404, indistinguishable from
absent), and re-enable (200).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- §4.7 warning: `apply` now reports when an enabled route or trigger is
bound to a disabled script — deployed but unreachable (route 404s,
trigger won't fire). A warning, not an error: it's valid desired state,
the operator just shouldn't be surprised by the silent 404.
- E2E journey (`tests/enabled.rs`): apply an active script and confirm
`/api/v1/execute/{id}` 200s; flip `enabled = false` in the manifest and
re-apply → 404; re-enable → 200. Exercises the whole path: manifest →
diff → apply → runtime honoring.
Tested: manager-core lib 367 + cli bins 31 + 15 project-tool journeys
(incl. the new enabled e2e) green; clippy -D warnings clean; versioning
gate passes (migration 0045).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
