MechaCat02 34c63f31be fix(audit-2026-06-11/H-H1): rate-limit email::send + per-message recipient cap
The Rhai SDK email::send path went straight to the SMTP relay with no
admission control. EmailRateLimiter lived in users_service.rs (gating
verification + password-reset emails) but was unreachable from the SDK
surface. Any anonymous-callable HTTP-route script could loop email::send
to burn the operator's SMTP quota or BCC-bomb thousands of recipients
per request.

Two new caps on EmailServiceImpl, both fire BEFORE message assembly +
SMTP connect:

1. Per-message recipient cap (to+cc+bcc combined). Default 20, override
   with PICLOUD_EMAIL_MAX_RECIPIENTS. New EmailError::TooManyRecipients
   variant. Closes the BCC-bomb amplification path.

2. EmailRateLimiter inlined into EmailServiceImpl:
   * Per-(app, recipient): RECIPIENT_BURST=5 / RECIPIENT_WINDOW=60min.
   * Per-app daily: APP_DAILY_CAP=200 / 24h.
   The structure mirrors users_service's private limiter; defense-in-
   depth redundancy is fine since the gates are identical and never
   conflict. New EmailError::RateLimited(&'static str) variant; the
   string names which bucket tripped so the operator can act.

users_service::map_email_error grows two cases (mapped to
EmailTransport for the script-facing error shape).

Tests:
* too_many_recipients_rejected — 30 recipients, default cap 20, rejected
  with TooManyRecipients.
* per_recipient_burst_caps_repeated_send_to_same_address — 6 sends to
  the same address; 6th returns RateLimited("per-recipient burst").

Audit ref: security_audit/09_external_integrations.md#f-ext-h-001.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 20:54:34 +02:00

PiCloud

A lightweight, self-hosted, event-driven serverless compute platform. Upload a Rhai script, get an HTTP endpoint. Designed to run on a single modest server with no idle CPU cost, and to scale out to a small cluster when you need it.

Status: Phase 1 — MVP scaffolding in progress.

The authoritative design lives in serverless_cloud_blueprint.md.

Why

Existing serverless platforms are either cloud-locked, heavyweight, or both. PiCloud aims for the opposite end of the spectrum: one binary, one database, one reverse proxy — running on hardware you already own.

Architecture (one paragraph)

PiCloud splits into three logical services — manager (control plane: scripts, schedules, dashboard), orchestrator (per-node event ingress and dispatch), and executor (per-node Rhai sandbox) — each backed by a *-core Rust library. In MVP they run in a single process; in cluster mode they run as three binaries with one manager and one orchestrator + executor per node. Caddy fronts everything; PostgreSQL is the single source of truth.

See CLAUDE.md for working notes and serverless_cloud_blueprint.md for the full design.

Quick Start

Coming as scaffolding lands. For now:

# Rust toolchain (pinned via rust-toolchain.toml)
cargo check --workspace

# Run the all-in-one MVP binary (once main.rs is wired up)
cargo run -p picloud

Repository Layout

crates/
  shared/                 cross-cutting types
  executor-core/          Rhai engine + sandbox
  orchestrator-core/      event ingress, dispatch
  manager-core/           control plane
  picloud/                MVP all-in-one binary
  picloud-{manager,orchestrator,executor}/   cluster-mode binaries (skeleton)
dashboard/                SvelteKit
caddy/                    Caddyfile
docker/                   Dockerfiles
docs/
  git-workflow.md         Trunk-based workflow

Contributing

See docs/git-workflow.md for the branching and commit conventions. TL;DR: trunk-based, short-lived branches, Conventional Commits, no force-pushing main.

License

TBD.

Description
No description provided
Readme 7.9 MiB
Languages
Rust 87.9%
Svelte 6.2%
TypeScript 5.7%