The endurance test refuted the sliding-window model I committed earlier. A keepalive doing only GET /api/v3/me succeeded at t+0/30/60/90 and was still rejected by t+120 — consistent with the session ending ~2h after LOGIN (t+107), and inconsistent with 2h after the last request, which would have been t+210. This is a live-vs-source divergence, not a misreading: both the current JwtWhitelistAdapter and the legacy Feathers ensureTokenIsWhitelisted re-set the Valkey TTL on every authenticated request, so the source reads as a sliding window. The instance does not behave that way. So the keepalive now calls POST /authentication/refresh-session, the endpoint behind the UI's "Sitzung verlängern" button, which a separate 100s test showed does hold the reported budget at 7200s. It is the only non-GET request in the server: no body, touches only our own session, cannot read or modify user data, and is not exposed as a tool, so no model-driven call can ever be a POST. It logs the returned budget, which makes a failing extension visible before the session is lost. Whether this is sufficient is NOT established. Two mechanisms still fit: an idle TTL that reads fail to refresh (keepalive works), or an absolute cap/revocation anchored at login — e.g. the IDP's back-channel logout, which clears every token for the account rather than one. Added scripts/session-diagnose.mjs to settle it: it logs the budget every 10 min, so a decaying series indicates the former and an abrupt 401 at 7200s the latter. Docs state the open question rather than asserting a mechanism. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB