Steinar H. Gunderson 86eb8b152b Change a few branch annotations that profiling found to be wrong.
Overall performance is neutral or slightly positive.

Westmere (64-bit, opt):

Benchmark               Base (ns)  New (ns)                                Improvement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_UFlat/0                  73798     71464  1.3GB/s  html                    +3.3%
BM_UFlat/1                 715223    704318  953.5MB/s  urls                  +1.5%
BM_UFlat/2                   8137      8871  13.0GB/s  jpg                    -8.3%
BM_UFlat/3                    200       204  935.5MB/s  jpg_200               -2.0%
BM_UFlat/4                  21627     21281  4.5GB/s  pdf                     +1.6%
BM_UFlat/5                 302806    290350  1.3GB/s  html4                   +4.3%
BM_UFlat/6                 218920    219017  664.1MB/s  txt1                  -0.0%
BM_UFlat/7                 190437    191212  626.1MB/s  txt2                  -0.4%
BM_UFlat/8                 584192    580484  703.4MB/s  txt3                  +0.6%
BM_UFlat/9                 776537    779055  591.6MB/s  txt4                  -0.3%
BM_UFlat/10                 76056     72606  1.5GB/s  pb                      +4.8%
BM_UFlat/11                235962    239043  737.4MB/s  gaviota               -1.3%
BM_UFlat/12                 28049     28000  840.1MB/s  cp                    +0.2%
BM_UFlat/13                 12225     12021  886.9MB/s  c                     +1.7%
BM_UFlat/14                  3362      3544  1004.0MB/s  lsp                  -5.1%
BM_UFlat/15                937015    939206  1048.9MB/s  xls                  -0.2%
BM_UFlat/16                   236       233  823.1MB/s  xls_200               +1.3%
BM_UFlat/17                373170    361947  1.3GB/s  bin                     +3.1%
BM_UFlat/18                   264       264  725.5MB/s  bin_200               +0.0%
BM_UFlat/19                 42834     43577  839.2MB/s  sum                   -1.7%
BM_UFlat/20                  4770      4736  853.6MB/s  man                   +0.7%
BM_UValidate/0              39671     39944  2.4GB/s  html                    -0.7%
BM_UValidate/1             443391    443391  1.5GB/s  urls                    +0.0%
BM_UValidate/2                163       163  703.3GB/s  jpg                   +0.0%
BM_UValidate/3                113       112  1.7GB/s  jpg_200                 +0.9%
BM_UValidate/4               7555      7608  12.6GB/s  pdf                    -0.7%
BM_ZFlat/0                 157616    157568  621.5MB/s  html (22.31 %)        +0.0%
BM_ZFlat/1                1997290   2014486  333.4MB/s  urls (47.77 %)        -0.9%
BM_ZFlat/2                  23035     22237  5.2GB/s  jpg (99.95 %)           +3.6%
BM_ZFlat/3                    539       540  354.5MB/s  jpg_200 (73.00 %)     -0.2%
BM_ZFlat/4                  80709     81369  1.2GB/s  pdf (81.85 %)           -0.8%
BM_ZFlat/5                 639059    639220  613.0MB/s  html4 (22.51 %)       -0.0%
BM_ZFlat/6                 577203    583370  249.3MB/s  txt1 (57.87 %)        -1.1%
BM_ZFlat/7                 510887    516094  232.0MB/s  txt2 (61.93 %)        -1.0%
BM_ZFlat/8                1535843   1556973  262.2MB/s  txt3 (54.92 %)        -1.4%
BM_ZFlat/9                2070068   2102380  219.3MB/s  txt4 (66.22 %)        -1.5%
BM_ZFlat/10                152396    152148  745.5MB/s  pb (19.64 %)          +0.2%
BM_ZFlat/11                447367    445859  395.4MB/s  gaviota (37.72 %)     +0.3%
BM_ZFlat/12                 76375     76797  306.3MB/s  cp (48.12 %)          -0.5%
BM_ZFlat/13                 31518     31987  333.3MB/s  c (42.40 %)           -1.5%
BM_ZFlat/14                 10598     10827  328.6MB/s  lsp (48.37 %)         -2.1%
BM_ZFlat/15               1782243   1802728  546.5MB/s  xls (41.23 %)         -1.1%
BM_ZFlat/16                   526       539  355.0MB/s  xls_200 (78.00 %)     -2.4%
BM_ZFlat/17                598141    597311  822.1MB/s  bin (18.11 %)         +0.1%
BM_ZFlat/18                   121       120  1.6GB/s  bin_200 (7.50 %)        +0.8%
BM_ZFlat/19                109981    112173  326.0MB/s  sum (48.96 %)         -2.0%
BM_ZFlat/20                 14355     14575  277.4MB/s  man (59.36 %)         -1.5%
Sum of all benchmarks    33882722  33879325                                   +0.0%

Sandy Bridge (64-bit, opt):

Benchmark               Base (ns)  New (ns)                                Improvement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_UFlat/0                  43764     41600  2.3GB/s  html                    +5.2%
BM_UFlat/1                 517990    507058  1.3GB/s  urls                    +2.2%
BM_UFlat/2                   6625      5529  20.8GB/s  jpg                   +19.8%
BM_UFlat/3                    154       155  1.2GB/s  jpg_200                 -0.6%
BM_UFlat/4                  12795     11747  8.1GB/s  pdf                     +8.9%
BM_UFlat/5                 200335    193413  2.0GB/s  html4                   +3.6%
BM_UFlat/6                 156574    156426  929.2MB/s  txt1                  +0.1%
BM_UFlat/7                 137574    137464  870.4MB/s  txt2                  +0.1%
BM_UFlat/8                 422551    421603  967.4MB/s  txt3                  +0.2%
BM_UFlat/9                 577749    578985  795.6MB/s  txt4                  -0.2%
BM_UFlat/10                 42329     39362  2.8GB/s  pb                      +7.5%
BM_UFlat/11                170615    169751  1037.9MB/s  gaviota              +0.5%
BM_UFlat/12                 12800     12719  1.8GB/s  cp                      +0.6%
BM_UFlat/13                  6585      6579  1.6GB/s  c                       +0.1%
BM_UFlat/14                  2066      2044  1.7GB/s  lsp                     +1.1%
BM_UFlat/15                750861    746911  1.3GB/s  xls                     +0.5%
BM_UFlat/16                   188       192  996.0MB/s  xls_200               -2.1%
BM_UFlat/17                271622    264333  1.8GB/s  bin                     +2.8%
BM_UFlat/18                   208       207  923.6MB/s  bin_200               +0.5%
BM_UFlat/19                 24667     24845  1.4GB/s  sum                     -0.7%
BM_UFlat/20                  2663      2662  1.5GB/s  man                     +0.0%
BM_ZFlat/0                 115173    115624  846.5MB/s  html (22.31 %)        -0.4%
BM_ZFlat/1                1530331   1537769  436.5MB/s  urls (47.77 %)        -0.5%
BM_ZFlat/2                  17503     17013  6.8GB/s  jpg (99.95 %)           +2.9%
BM_ZFlat/3                    385       385  496.3MB/s  jpg_200 (73.00 %)     +0.0%
BM_ZFlat/4                  61753     61540  1.6GB/s  pdf (81.85 %)           +0.3%
BM_ZFlat/5                 484806    483356  810.1MB/s  html4 (22.51 %)       +0.3%
BM_ZFlat/6                 464143    467609  310.9MB/s  txt1 (57.87 %)        -0.7%
BM_ZFlat/7                 410315    413319  289.5MB/s  txt2 (61.93 %)        -0.7%
BM_ZFlat/8                1244082   1249381  326.5MB/s  txt3 (54.92 %)        -0.4%
BM_ZFlat/9                1696914   1709685  269.4MB/s  txt4 (66.22 %)        -0.7%
BM_ZFlat/10                104148    103372  1096.7MB/s  pb (19.64 %)         +0.8%
BM_ZFlat/11                363522    359722  489.8MB/s  gaviota (37.72 %)     +1.1%
BM_ZFlat/12                 47021     50095  469.3MB/s  cp (48.12 %)          -6.1%
BM_ZFlat/13                 16888     16985  627.4MB/s  c (42.40 %)           -0.6%
BM_ZFlat/14                  5496      5469  650.3MB/s  lsp (48.37 %)         +0.5%
BM_ZFlat/15               1460713   1448760  679.5MB/s  xls (41.23 %)         +0.8%
BM_ZFlat/16                   387       393  486.8MB/s  xls_200 (78.00 %)     -1.5%
BM_ZFlat/17                457654    451462  1086.6MB/s  bin (18.11 %)        +1.4%
BM_ZFlat/18                    97        87  2.1GB/s  bin_200 (7.50 %)       +11.5%
BM_ZFlat/19                 77904     80924  451.7MB/s  sum (48.96 %)         -3.7%
BM_ZFlat/20                  7648      7663  527.1MB/s  man (59.36 %)         -0.2%
Sum of all benchmarks    25493635  25482069                                   +0.0%

A=dehao
R=sesse
2015-06-22 16:09:56 +02:00
2014-02-28 11:18:07 +00:00
2014-02-28 11:18:07 +00:00
2015-06-22 15:39:08 +02:00
2014-02-28 11:18:07 +00:00
2015-06-22 15:39:08 +02:00
2015-06-22 15:39:08 +02:00

Snappy, a fast compressor/decompressor.


Introduction
============

Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum
compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead,
it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance,
compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster
for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to
100% bigger. (For more information, see "Performance", below.)

Snappy has the following properties:

 * Fast: Compression speeds at 250 MB/sec and beyond, with no assembler code.
   See "Performance" below.
 * Stable: Over the last few years, Snappy has compressed and decompressed
   petabytes of data in Google's production environment. The Snappy bitstream
   format is stable and will not change between versions.
 * Robust: The Snappy decompressor is designed not to crash in the face of
   corrupted or malicious input.
 * Free and open source software: Snappy is licensed under a BSD-type license.
   For more information, see the included COPYING file.

Snappy has previously been called "Zippy" in some Google presentations
and the like.


Performance
===========
 
Snappy is intended to be fast. On a single core of a Core i7 processor
in 64-bit mode, it compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at
about 500 MB/sec or more. (These numbers are for the slowest inputs in our
benchmark suite; others are much faster.) In our tests, Snappy usually
is faster than algorithms in the same class (e.g. LZO, LZF, FastLZ, QuickLZ,
etc.) while achieving comparable compression ratios.

Typical compression ratios (based on the benchmark suite) are about 1.5-1.7x
for plain text, about 2-4x for HTML, and of course 1.0x for JPEGs, PNGs and
other already-compressed data. Similar numbers for zlib in its fastest mode
are 2.6-2.8x, 3-7x and 1.0x, respectively. More sophisticated algorithms are
capable of achieving yet higher compression rates, although usually at the
expense of speed. Of course, compression ratio will vary significantly with
the input.

Although Snappy should be fairly portable, it is primarily optimized
for 64-bit x86-compatible processors, and may run slower in other environments.
In particular:

 - Snappy uses 64-bit operations in several places to process more data at
   once than would otherwise be possible.
 - Snappy assumes unaligned 32- and 64-bit loads and stores are cheap.
   On some platforms, these must be emulated with single-byte loads 
   and stores, which is much slower.
 - Snappy assumes little-endian throughout, and needs to byte-swap data in
   several places if running on a big-endian platform.

Experience has shown that even heavily tuned code can be improved.
Performance optimizations, whether for 64-bit x86 or other platforms,
are of course most welcome; see "Contact", below.


Usage
=====

Note that Snappy, both the implementation and the main interface,
is written in C++. However, several third-party bindings to other languages
are available; see the Google Code page at http://code.google.com/p/snappy/
for more information. Also, if you want to use Snappy from C code, you can
use the included C bindings in snappy-c.h.

To use Snappy from your own C++ program, include the file "snappy.h" from
your calling file, and link against the compiled library.

There are many ways to call Snappy, but the simplest possible is

  snappy::Compress(input.data(), input.size(), &output);

and similarly

  snappy::Uncompress(input.data(), input.size(), &output);

where "input" and "output" are both instances of std::string.

There are other interfaces that are more flexible in various ways, including
support for custom (non-array) input sources. See the header file for more
information.


Tests and benchmarks
====================

When you compile Snappy, snappy_unittest is compiled in addition to the
library itself. You do not need it to use the compressor from your own library,
but it contains several useful components for Snappy development.

First of all, it contains unit tests, verifying correctness on your machine in
various scenarios. If you want to change or optimize Snappy, please run the
tests to verify you have not broken anything. Note that if you have the
Google Test library installed, unit test behavior (especially failures) will be
significantly more user-friendly. You can find Google Test at

  http://code.google.com/p/googletest/

You probably also want the gflags library for handling of command-line flags;
you can find it at

  http://code.google.com/p/google-gflags/

In addition to the unit tests, snappy contains microbenchmarks used to
tune compression and decompression performance. These are automatically run
before the unit tests, but you can disable them using the flag
--run_microbenchmarks=false if you have gflags installed (otherwise you will
need to edit the source).

Finally, snappy can benchmark Snappy against a few other compression libraries
(zlib, LZO, LZF, FastLZ and QuickLZ), if they were detected at configure time.
To benchmark using a given file, give the compression algorithm you want to test
Snappy against (e.g. --zlib) and then a list of one or more file names on the
command line. The testdata/ directory contains the files used by the
microbenchmark, which should provide a reasonably balanced starting point for
benchmarking. (Note that baddata[1-3].snappy are not intended as benchmarks; they
are used to verify correctness in the presence of corrupted data in the unit
test.)


Contact
=======

Snappy is distributed through Google Code. For the latest version, a bug tracker,
and other information, see

  http://code.google.com/p/snappy/
Description
No description provided
Readme 2.9 MiB
Languages
C++ 89.5%
CMake 5.4%
C 2.6%
Starlark 2.5%