re: my own 1697 audited -- and the first correction failed its control
Applying the port's physical-story rule to my own number. '1 697 fallback fires return a visible pose' was published as if it were a defect count; it is not, since an element that genuinely ends visible should rest visible. The first correction split the 1 697 by whether the element's LAST keyframe is visible: 347 correct, 1 350 transient peaks. Plausible, arithmetic fine, and WRONG -- 12 278 of 13 991 elements (87.8 %) end at alpha 0 because a screen's exit ramp drives everything to zero, so the split carries almost no information. The 1 350 is not published. What survives needs no such split: the fallback runs only when no two adjacent poses are equal, i.e. only when no pose is held, so every pose it can return is un-held by construction -- and 1 457 of the 2 305 times it returns the element's MAXIMUM alpha, the brightest un-held pose. I ran that control only because the port had just been bitten by the same exit ramp, its census calling ptmsg -- the main menu's permanent footer -- 'a 2-unit flash'. Without its message the 1 350 would have shipped. METHOD gains the sharpened form: the physical-story test catches confident FALSE claims, not just nulls. A wrong number usually still has a story, just an absurd one. Plus the tell that its fix was right -- re-keyed on the screen's span, the false positives fell out on their own, and a definition that stops needing hand-maintained exceptions is usually the correct one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
This commit is contained in:
68
crates/sylpheed-formats/examples/rest_fallback_audit.rs
Normal file
68
crates/sylpheed-formats/examples/rest_fallback_audit.rs
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
//! Does "1 697 fallback fires return a visible pose" survive being said out loud?
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! `rest-fallback-census.txt` reports that of 2 305 elements where the dwell
|
||||
//! fallback decides, 1 697 rest at `alpha > 0`. It was written as if that number
|
||||
//! were the defect. **It is only a defect where the element is a transient.** An
|
||||
//! element that genuinely ends visible and stays visible SHOULD rest visible, and
|
||||
//! the fallback happening to be the path that got there is not an error.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The port agent hit the mirror image of this: it counted a screen's own exit
|
||||
//! ramp as the end of an element's visibility, so `ptmsg` — the main menu's
|
||||
//! permanent footer — came out as "a 2-unit flash". The story collapsed when
|
||||
//! said aloud. This asks the same question of my number.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Split the 1 697 by what the element's LAST keyframe does:
|
||||
//! * last alpha > 0 -> the element ends visible; resting visible is right
|
||||
//! * last alpha == 0 -> it fades out; a visible rest is a transient's peak
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! cargo run -p sylpheed-formats --example rest_fallback_audit
|
||||
use sylpheed_formats::{pak::PakArchive, ui_layout};
|
||||
use std::path::PathBuf;
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
let root = PathBuf::from(std::env::var("SYLPHEED_DISC").expect("SYLPHEED_DISC"));
|
||||
let mut paks: Vec<PathBuf> = std::fs::read_dir(root.join("dat")).expect("dat/")
|
||||
.filter_map(|e| e.ok().map(|e| e.path()))
|
||||
.filter(|p| p.extension().is_some_and(|x| x == "pak")).collect();
|
||||
paks.sort();
|
||||
let (mut fires, mut vis, mut ends_visible, mut ends_zero, mut at_peak) = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
|
||||
// ⚠️ The port agent's exit-ramp finding applies to THIS split too: if a
|
||||
// screen's exit ramp drives every element to a=0, then "last keyframe a=0"
|
||||
// says nothing about the element being a transient. Measure it on ALL
|
||||
// elements before using it on the 1 697.
|
||||
let (mut all_el, mut all_end_zero) = (0usize, 0usize);
|
||||
for pak in &paks {
|
||||
let Ok(ar) = PakArchive::open(pak) else { continue };
|
||||
for e in ar.entries() {
|
||||
let Ok(by) = ar.read(e) else { continue };
|
||||
let Some(b) = ui_layout::parse_build(&by) else { continue };
|
||||
for el in &b.elements {
|
||||
if el.keyframes.len() < 2 { continue }
|
||||
all_el += 1;
|
||||
if (el.keyframes.last().unwrap().fade >> 24) & 0xff == 0 { all_end_zero += 1 }
|
||||
if el.keyframes.windows(2).any(|w| w[0].x == w[1].x && w[0].y == w[1].y
|
||||
&& w[0].scale_x == w[1].scale_x && w[0].scale_y == w[1].scale_y
|
||||
&& w[0].fade == w[1].fade) { continue }
|
||||
fires += 1;
|
||||
let Some(r) = el.rest() else { continue };
|
||||
let a = (r.fade >> 24) & 0xff;
|
||||
if a == 0 { continue }
|
||||
vis += 1;
|
||||
let last = (el.keyframes.last().unwrap().fade >> 24) & 0xff;
|
||||
if last > 0 { ends_visible += 1 } else { ends_zero += 1 }
|
||||
let peak = el.keyframes.iter().map(|k| (k.fade >> 24) & 0xff).max().unwrap_or(0);
|
||||
if a == peak { at_peak += 1 }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
println!("fallback fires {fires}");
|
||||
println!(" of those, rest alpha > 0 {vis}");
|
||||
println!(" element's LAST keyframe alpha > 0 {ends_visible} <- ends visible; resting visible is CORRECT");
|
||||
println!(" element's LAST keyframe alpha = 0 {ends_zero} <- fades out; a visible rest is a transient's peak");
|
||||
println!(" rest alpha == the element's MAX {at_peak}");
|
||||
println!("\nCONTROL on the split itself — is 'ends at a=0' near-universal?");
|
||||
println!(" all elements with >= 2 keyframes {all_el}");
|
||||
println!(" of those, last keyframe alpha = 0 {all_end_zero} ({:.1} %)",
|
||||
100.0 * all_end_zero as f64 / all_el as f64);
|
||||
println!("\n--- END (if this line is missing, the run did not finish) ---");
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1584,3 +1584,30 @@ stories collapse the moment they are told out loud.
|
||||
**And a control does not test this.** A control proves the **instrument**; it says
|
||||
nothing about the **sample**. Neither of us has a habit that catches a well-measured
|
||||
number taken from the wrong thing — this is the closest either has got.
|
||||
|
||||
### The physical-story test catches confident FALSE claims, not just nulls
|
||||
|
||||
Sharpened by the port agent after the rule's first *prospective* catch. Its census
|
||||
returned "28 elements across 12 screens", arithmetic correct, no control it would
|
||||
have failed — and the list contained `ptmsg`, the main menu's own
|
||||
`⊙ Select Ⓐ OK` footer, as **"visible 2 of 64 units"**, plus `ptbtn00`, the plate.
|
||||
Both sit on screen the whole time the game does.
|
||||
|
||||
**Nothing else pointed at it.** The story collapsed the moment it was said aloud.
|
||||
The cause was that a screen's **exit ramp** drives every element to `a = 0`, so
|
||||
counting the exit as the end of visibility made every normal element look like a
|
||||
flash.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ So the net is wider than *null-as-result*: **a wrong number usually still has a
|
||||
story, just an absurd one.** "The footer is a 2-unit flash" is not a null — it is a
|
||||
confident false claim, and the same test catches it as catches *"no element ends on
|
||||
an alpha ramp"*.
|
||||
|
||||
📌 And the fix has the tell of a right definition: re-keyed on the **screen's** span
|
||||
rather than the element's, `ptmsg` and `ptbtn00` fell out **on their own**. A
|
||||
definition that stops needing hand-maintained exceptions is usually the correct one.
|
||||
|
||||
**It caught one of mine within the hour.** I split a census by whether an element's
|
||||
last keyframe is visible; 87.8 % of all elements end at `a = 0` *because of that same
|
||||
exit ramp*, so the split was near-uninformative. I ran that control only because the
|
||||
port had just been bitten by it.
|
||||
|
||||
46
docs/re/data/rest-fallback-audit.txt
Normal file
46
docs/re/data/rest-fallback-audit.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Auditing my OWN 1 697 with the port's rule -- and the first correction failed
|
||||
# its own control. 2026-08-30.
|
||||
#
|
||||
fallback fires 2305
|
||||
of those, rest alpha > 0 1697
|
||||
element's LAST keyframe alpha > 0 347 <- ends visible; resting visible is CORRECT
|
||||
element's LAST keyframe alpha = 0 1350 <- fades out; a visible rest is a transient's peak
|
||||
rest alpha == the element's MAX 1457
|
||||
|
||||
CONTROL on the split itself — is 'ends at a=0' near-universal?
|
||||
all elements with >= 2 keyframes 13991
|
||||
of those, last keyframe alpha = 0 12278 (87.8 %)
|
||||
|
||||
--- END (if this line is missing, the run did not finish) ---
|
||||
#
|
||||
# THE STORY, SAID OUT LOUD:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 1. '1 697 fallback fires return a visible pose' was published as if the
|
||||
# number were a defect count. It is not. An element that genuinely ends
|
||||
# visible and stays visible SHOULD rest visible; the fallback being the
|
||||
# path that got there is not an error.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 2. FIRST CORRECTION, and it looked clean: split by whether the element's
|
||||
# LAST keyframe is visible. 347 end visible (correct), 1 350 fade out
|
||||
# (a transient's peak). Plausible, arithmetic fine.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 3. 🔴 IT FAILED ITS CONTROL. The port agent had just found that a SCREEN's
|
||||
# exit ramp drives every element to a=0 at the end -- which is why its own
|
||||
# census called ptmsg, the permanent footer, 'a 2-unit flash'. Measured
|
||||
# here: 12 278 of 13 991 elements (87.8 %) end at alpha 0. So 'ends at
|
||||
# a=0' is near-universal and says almost nothing about being a transient.
|
||||
# The 1 350 is not a transient count and is NOT published as one.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 4. ✅ WHAT SURVIVES, and it needs no such split:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 2 305 elements where the dwell fallback decides
|
||||
# 1 457 of those rest at the element's MAXIMUM alpha
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The fallback runs only when NO two adjacent poses are equal -- i.e.
|
||||
# only when no pose is held. So every pose it can return is un-held by
|
||||
# construction, and 1 457 times it returns the BRIGHTEST un-held pose.
|
||||
# That is the defect shape, stated without needing to know where the
|
||||
# element's visibility ends.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I ran the control only because the port had just been bitten by the exit
|
||||
# ramp. Without that message the 1 350 would have shipped.
|
||||
@@ -328,7 +328,24 @@ Disc-wide ([`../data/rest-fallback-census.txt`](../data/rest-fallback-census.txt
|
||||
| elements with ≥ 2 keyframes | 13 991 |
|
||||
| have a plateau — the fallback never runs | 11 686 |
|
||||
| **have none — the fallback decides** | **2 305** |
|
||||
| **of those, it returns a VISIBLE pose** | **1 697 (74 %)** |
|
||||
| of those, it returns a visible pose | 1 697 (74 %) |
|
||||
| **of those, it returns the element's MAXIMUM alpha** | **1 457** |
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ **"1 697" is not a defect count and this page briefly implied it was.** An element
|
||||
that genuinely ends visible *should* rest visible. **The number that survives is
|
||||
1 457**: the fallback runs only when no two adjacent poses are equal — i.e. only when
|
||||
**no pose is held** — so every pose it can return is un-held by construction, and
|
||||
1 457 times it hands back the *brightest* one.
|
||||
|
||||
🔴 **A first attempt to correct this failed its own control**, and is recorded
|
||||
because the failure is instructive
|
||||
([`../data/rest-fallback-audit.txt`](../data/rest-fallback-audit.txt)). Splitting the
|
||||
1 697 by whether the element's **last** keyframe is visible gave 347 / 1 350 — plausible,
|
||||
arithmetic sound. But **12 278 of 13 991 elements (87.8 %) end at alpha 0**, because a
|
||||
screen's *exit ramp* drives everything to zero. The split carries almost no
|
||||
information. The port agent had been bitten by exactly this an hour earlier — its
|
||||
census called `ptmsg`, the main menu's permanent footer, "a 2-unit flash" — and I ran
|
||||
the control only because it said so.
|
||||
|
||||
**`GP_TITLE`: 5 fires, 4 visible** — and all four are on the **splash screens**,
|
||||
`palogo_sqex_eff.t32` / `palogo_anima_eff.t32` on entries 10/11/13/14. Each reads
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user