handoff: pteff03a IS drawn -- keep both sweeps; units 5 and 6 refuted

Also notes that REFUTED.md L170 already recorded a draw carrying two rotated
parallelograms, so the general fact was written down before my reader
contradicted it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jc4pciRArGHfxGGhEbwp5t
This commit is contained in:
sylph-decoder
2026-09-02 20:39:00 +00:00
parent 33e3c40a2d
commit 1acdb004b6
2 changed files with 33 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ What would have caught it, and what I did only on the third pass: **read one raw
draw line in full** before trusting a count derived from it. `indices=8` was
printed on every one of those lines and says two quads outright.
And the corpus already held the general fact. `REFUTED.md` L170 records the
swoosh being **"submitted as two rotated parallelograms"** in one draw. That one
draw line can carry more than one quad was known and written down; my reader
simply did not implement it.
⚠️ Claims that depended on the first-vertex reader and are **not** affected: the
alpha decomposition in unit 10 (quad A read consistently on both sides), the
press/no-press comparisons in F5 (same reader both sides), and the pulse ratio