re: the debriefing and pilot-record screens; the save-screen block was already owned

Read-before-claiming caught one of the three.  savegame-format.md already
documents the shape AND this exact list -- the LOAD/SAVE screen's config key list
is compiled into the executable as a pointer array of key strings, run starting
0x820A0074.  sub_82286BC8's 18 names are that list (17/18 are a tables.pak field
or record).  Nothing new; residual PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10, not a tables.pak name.

The other two are new screens of the same shape and they close exactly.  All
names resolve into tables.pak: sub_822814D8 24/24, sub_8227A3A0 21/21.

sub_822814D8 = the debriefing screen.  24 = 2 screen ids (STAGE_RESULT,
EX_STAGE_RESULT) + 21 stage_* fields + one sound cue (SE_BOSS_CORE_CHARGE); the
tables.pak STAGE_RESULT record has exactly 21 fields.

sub_8227A3A0 = the pilot record / career screen.  21 = 5 screen ids (LAST_RESULT,
EX_BASE, EX_MAIN, EX_OVERVIEW, OVERVIEW) + 7 ex_overview_* + 9 overview_*; the
records EX_OVERVIEW and OVERVIEW have exactly 7 and 9 fields.

2+21+1 = 24 and 5+7+9 = 21, with 21/7/9 measured independently off the pak.

The debriefing readout is nine num/points pairs plus three points-only lines:
kills by class, objectives, clear time, shoot-down ratio and both damage
categories carry a raw count and its score contribution, while friendly_fire,
shoot_down_others and weight have no counter column -- the same partition
mission-scoring.md measures on the settings side.  OVERVIEW is the seven
EX_OVERVIEW fields plus overview_rank and overview_medals.

Not settled: what EX_ means (its ids have no record of that name), and
PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
This commit is contained in:
Claude (auto)
2026-08-27 22:38:56 +00:00
parent d378de8cec
commit 67b04a945e
3 changed files with 127 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -5244,3 +5244,51 @@ list. The function body was not read. And four of the five surfaced blocks are
still unopened (`STAGE_RESULT`/`EX_OVERVIEW`; `g_mWorldViewProjection`/
`NormalMap`; `Boss16Collision*`; `roh_n001_menu1_cam_pos`) — each grepped this
iteration and each appearing in **no** document but my own.
---
## ✅ 2026-08-27 — the debriefing and pilot-record screens; the save-screen block was already owned
Item (a), the results/leaderboard blocks. New doc
`docs/re/structures/result-screens.md`. Static only; no artefact changed.
⚠️ **Read-before-claiming caught one of the three.** `savegame-format.md` already
documents the shape *and* this exact list: *"the LOAD/SAVE screen's config key
list is compiled into the executable, as a pointer array of key strings — the
same shape as the Arsenal's … match the pak record exactly"*, run starting
`0x820A0074`. **`sub_82286BC8`'s 18 names are that list** (17/18 are a
`tables.pak` field or record). Nothing new there; residual
**`PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10`**, not a `tables.pak` name at all.
**The other two are new screens of the same shape, and they close exactly.**
All names resolve into `tables.pak`: `sub_822814D8` **24/24**, `sub_8227A3A0`
**21/21**.
* **`sub_822814D8` = the debriefing screen.** 24 = 2 screen ids
(`STAGE_RESULT`, `EX_STAGE_RESULT`) + **21 `stage_*` fields** + one sound cue
(`SE_BOSS_CORE_CHARGE`); the `tables.pak` `STAGE_RESULT` record has **exactly
21** fields (2 objects, both 21).
* **`sub_8227A3A0` = the pilot record / career screen.** 21 = 5 screen ids
(`LAST_RESULT`, `EX_BASE`, `EX_MAIN`, `EX_OVERVIEW`, `OVERVIEW`) + **7
`ex_overview_*`** + **9 `overview_*`**; the records `EX_OVERVIEW` and `OVERVIEW`
have **exactly 7 and 9**.
`2+21+1 = 24` and `5+7+9 = 21`, with 21/7/9 measured independently off the pak —
the arithmetic closes both ways.
🔑 **The debriefing readout is nine `num`/`points` pairs plus three points-only
lines**: kills by class, main/sub objectives, clear time, shoot-down ratio and
both damage categories carry a raw count *and* its score contribution;
`friendly_fire`, `shoot_down_others` and `weight` have no counter column. Same
partition `mission-scoring.md` measures on the settings side — that document owns
the *rules*, this is the *readout*.
🔑 `OVERVIEW` = the seven `EX_OVERVIEW` fields **plus `overview_rank` and
`overview_medals`**, which is what makes `EX_` the reduced variant of the same
screen rather than a different one.
🟡 Not settled: what `EX_` means — `EX_BASE`, `EX_MAIN`, `EX_STAGE_RESULT`,
`EX_FONT` are keys with **no record of that name**, so it is a screen-id
convention, not a table. `PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10` unexplained. And **two of the four
surfaced blocks remain unopened** (`g_mWorldViewProjection`/`NormalMap` engine
material slots; `Boss16Collision*` + `roh_n001_menu1_cam_pos`).

View File

@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ files, which is how the same ground got covered twice.
| [`structures/stage-settings-table.md`](structures/stage-settings-table.md) | The per-stage settings object — Camera rigs, Player limits, Difficulty_* damage record | ✅ CONFIRMED, 24 settings objects vs 29 resource objects both using Phase_1/2/3; Camera is 13/14 fields constant; GravityFactor non-zero in 4 stages; IsBoss16Enable identifies one object; the Phase block is 94 fields of which 68 never vary between phases; all 24 objects named StageParameter_S<NN> |
| [`structures/isl-mission-timer.md`](structures/isl-mission-timer.md) | The mission timer — two sequential countdowns, not a limit and a warning | ✅ CONFIRMED — read from `sub_822639B8`; the threshold reading is |
| [`structures/archive-naming.md`](structures/archive-naming.md) | Which archives the disc can name — 100% for menu paks, **0.0%** for the six 2D paks and `GP_READY_ROOM` | ✅ CONFIRMED — 6027 names × 16 prefixes, bimodal; unnamed entries split by content — three UI paks have ZERO unnamed IDXD (artwork only), DefTables is the only real data gap (1295 LOD/motion tables); **route 2 = the `Enumerate` declaration tables** closes DefTables to 1413/1425 IDXD (99.2 %), 12 left; XPR2 manifests refuted as a naming source |
| [`structures/result-screens.md`](structures/result-screens.md) | The debriefing and pilot-record screens — `STAGE_RESULT` 21 fields, `OVERVIEW` 9, `EX_OVERVIEW` 7 | ✅ CONFIRMED — the compiled key lists `sub_822814D8` (24/24) and `sub_8227A3A0` (21/21) match the `tables.pak` records exactly; `2+21+1=24`, `5+7+9=21` |
| [`structures/player-tuning-tables.md`](structures/player-tuning-tables.md) | **`PlayerParams`** — the player parameter table: `Booster` flight model, special attacks, 8 analog curves, the S16 boss | ✅✅ `sub_822F9498` is `PlayerParams`'s loader, not the unit loader; **the analog block's reader SOLVED — `sub_821A6CF0`, base `0x820A1630`**, via the new base-solver (277 name-block loaders image-wide, control 217/226 on `sub_82341A20`); 🟡 nothing selects `Booster` |
| [`structures/hud-config.md`](structures/hud-config.md) | The in-game HUD configuration — 16 records, 419 asset paths, and a per-stage `ResourceTable` | ✅ CONFIRMED — 0 of 419 config paths resolve as pak entries |
| [`structures/mission-script-manifest.md`](structures/mission-script-manifest.md) | `Stage\script.tbl`'s 11 non-`MISSION` fields, and the mission dialogue table they name | ✅ CONFIRMED — 1 of 7 values resolves (`message\MissionDialogMessage.tbl`, 200 records), controls in the same sweep |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
# ✅ The debriefing and pilot-record screens — `STAGE_RESULT`, `OVERVIEW`, `EX_OVERVIEW`
- **Where:** `tables.pak` (the menu config pak), records `STAGE_RESULT`, `OVERVIEW`,
`EX_OVERVIEW`; key lists compiled into the executable at `sub_822814D8` and
`sub_8227A3A0` (found by the base-solver, [[player-tuning-tables]]).
- **Related:** [[mission-scoring]] owns the *rules* (`Score_*` in the stage
settings); this is the *readout*. [[savegame-format]] documents the same
compiled-key-list shape for the LOAD/SAVE screen.
## The shape was already known — for other screens
[[savegame-format]] establishes it: *"the LOAD/SAVE screen's config key list is
compiled into the executable, as a pointer array of key strings — the same shape
as the Arsenal's (whose keys sit a few hundred bytes earlier and match the pak
record exactly)"*, run starting `0x820A0074`. **`sub_82286BC8`'s 18-name block is
exactly that list** — 17 of its 18 are a `tables.pak` field or record name, so it
is the documented save-screen list and nothing new. Its lone residual is
**`PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10`**, which is not a `tables.pak` name at all.
## ✅ Two more screens, and the key lists match their records exactly
| block | names | all present in `tables.pak`? |
|---|---:|---|
| `sub_822814D8` | 24 | **24 / 24** |
| `sub_8227A3A0` | 21 | **21 / 21** |
And the arithmetic closes against the records themselves:
* **`sub_822814D8` = the debriefing screen.** 24 names = 2 screen ids
(`STAGE_RESULT`, `EX_STAGE_RESULT`) + **21 `stage_*` fields** + one sound cue
(`SE_BOSS_CORE_CHARGE`). The `tables.pak` record `STAGE_RESULT` has **exactly
21 fields** (2 objects, both 21).
* **`sub_8227A3A0` = the pilot record / career screen.** 21 names = 5 screen ids
(`LAST_RESULT`, `EX_BASE`, `EX_MAIN`, `EX_OVERVIEW`, `OVERVIEW`) + **7
`ex_overview_*`** + **9 `overview_*`**. The records `EX_OVERVIEW` and
`OVERVIEW` have **exactly 7 and 9 fields** (2 objects each).
`2+21+1 = 24` and `5+7+9 = 21`, with 21/7/9 measured independently off the pak.
### The debriefing readout, in full
```
stage_num_shoot_down_aircrafts stage_points_shoot_down_aircrafts
stage_num_shoot_down_ships stage_points_shoot_down_ships
stage_points_shoot_down_others
stage_weight_shoot_down
stage_num_main_objectives stage_points_main_objectives
stage_num_sub_objectives stage_points_sub_objectives
stage_clear_time stage_points_clear_time
stage_shoot_down_ratio stage_points_shoot_down_ratio
stage_damages_friendly_ships stage_points_damages_friendly_ships
stage_damages_wingman stage_points_damages_wingman
stage_points_friendly_fire
stage_total_points stage_rank
```
🔑 **Nine `num`/`points` pairs plus three points-only lines** — the screen shows
a raw count *and* its score contribution for kills by class, objectives, time,
ratio and both damage categories; `friendly_fire`, `shoot_down_others` and
`weight` have no counter column. That is the same partition
[[mission-scoring]] measures on the settings side.
### The career readout
`overview_points`, `_total_play_time`, `_clear_stages`, `_retry_times`,
`_shoot_down_aircrafts`, `_shoot_down_ships`, `_shoot_down_weight` — seven, and
`OVERVIEW` adds **`overview_rank`** and **`overview_medals`**. The `EX_` twin has
the seven and neither of the two, which is what makes `EX_` the reduced variant
rather than a different screen.
🟡 Not settled: what `EX_` means (a second profile? the online/leaderboard
variant?) — `EX_BASE`, `EX_MAIN`, `EX_STAGE_RESULT` and `EX_FONT` are keys with
**no record of that name**, so the prefix is a screen-id convention, not a table.
And `PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10` is unexplained.
**Reproduce:** parse `tables.pak` with `tools/re-capture/unitgroup.py` and count
the fields of the three records; take the key lists from the `sub_822814D8` /
`sub_8227A3A0` / `sub_82286BC8` sections of [`../data/name-block-bases.txt`](../data/name-block-bases.txt).