fabi/Sylpheed
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 9 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: the stuck-wait control holds on a second run, and the freeze did not come

Browse Source 
A second 25-minute Stage 02 run under --log_stuck_waits ended NO FREEZE within
1500s, with the probe again reporting exactly one pair - thread F800004C on
object BE56BB5C - 24 lines against the first run's 27. The healthy-run control is
therefore measured twice and independently, so anything else the probe prints
during a freeze is signal.

Also recorded: two consecutive runs did not freeze, and the earlier freezes came
in a cluster. Roughly half the runs that reached flight ended early across the
session, but not evenly, so "wait for a freeze" is a ~30-minute lottery per run
rather than a dependable step. Instrument, watcher and control are in place; one
frozen sample is what is missing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
This commit is contained in:
Sylpheed RE agent
2026-08-24 03:14:14 +00:00
parent 5542729802
commit 7a5c5b919b
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
docs/re/mission-freeze-resume-spin.md
View File

@@ -369,3 +369,22 @@ dominates. The freeze signal will therefore be the **appearance of a new
**Not settled:** the freeze did not reproduce in this run, so there is no frozen
sample to compare yet. That is the whole of the next step, and the instrument and
its control are now in place for it.
### 2026-08-24 — the control holds on a second run; the freeze did not come
A second Stage 02 run with `--log_stuck_waits=true`, watched end to end by
[`freeze_watch.sh`](../../tools/re-capture/freeze_watch.sh):
**`NO FREEZE within 1500s`** — about 25 minutes of flight, and the probe again
reported exactly **one** pair, `thread F800004C on object BE56BB5C (type 2)`,
24 lines against the first run's 27.
So the healthy-run control is now measured **twice, independently**, and it is
the same single legitimate poller both times. Anything else the probe prints
during a freeze is signal.
🟡 **And the cost of catching one is worth stating.** Two consecutive runs did
not freeze; the freezes earlier in the day came in a cluster. Across the session
roughly half the runs that reached flight ended early (freeze or GAME OVER), but
they are **not evenly distributed**, so "wait for a freeze" is a ~30-minute
lottery ticket per run rather than a reliable step. The instrument, the watcher
and the control are all in place; what is missing is one frozen sample.