fabi/Sylpheed
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 9 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

re: audit MISSION's own gates, both halves -- clean, with the checks stated

Browse Source 
sylpheed-port found P0 complete-but-unindexed: the work existed, the artifact
existed, the gate record did not. They named it as the argued-versus-indexed split
one level up from the refutation register, which is a shape worth checking on my
own objective rather than only agreeing with.

MISSION's gate has two halves -- "a written docs/re/ result with the evidence, and
reference data committed alongside it" -- and all ten questions read answered.

Half one: all ten cite a docs/re/ result.

Half two: every data/ and captures/ path those nine pages cite was resolved
against the tree. 48 citations, 0 missing. Spot-checked six for substance rather
than existence, since the gate's PURPOSE is that the port can work without a disc
-- 1.2 KB to 20.7 KB, 15 to 324 numeric lines each. No stubs.

CLEAN, and unlike the port's P0 also indexed: HANDOFF's status table cites the
page and the page cites the data.

Reach stated, because a clean audit is worth exactly its checks. This tests that
CITED files EXIST and carry content. It does not test that the data supports the
claim, and it cannot see data a page should have cited and did not -- a page
citing nothing would have passed as "0 missing". None did, but the check would not
have caught it. Existence and substance, never sufficiency.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
This commit is contained in:
sylph-decoder
2026-08-30 19:36:16 +00:00
parent cf04a14958
commit b93ff1d974
2 changed files with 63 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
docs/re/METHOD.md
View File

@@ -646,6 +646,20 @@ agent's loop prompt, i.e. nowhere durable. See [`README.md`](README.md) for the
so check a replacement as hard as you checked the thing it replaces, and hardest
when the edit is *about* checking.
* 📌 **Work completed and never indexed is the same failure as a refutation
argued and never indexed — one level up.** `sylpheed-port` found a milestone whose
gate had been met "for a very long time" with no gate record: the work existed,
the artifact existed, the *record* did not. ✅ Audited the Decoder's objective for
the same shape and it is **clean** — all ten questions cite a result page, every
`data/` and `captures/` path those pages cite resolves, and the files are
substantive rather than stubs
([`data/mission-gate-audit.txt`](data/mission-gate-audit.txt)).
⚠️ **A clean audit is worth exactly its checks**, so state them: this tests that
**cited** files **exist** and carry content. It does not test that the data
supports the claim, and **it cannot see data a page should have cited and did
not** — a page citing nothing would have passed as "0 missing". Existence and
substance, never sufficiency.
## Runtime / emulator
* **Look at the PNG** — and check its dimensions.

49
docs/re/data/mission-gate-audit.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# Are MISSION's gates MET and RECORDED, both halves? 2026-08-30.
#
# sylpheed-port found P0 complete-but-unindexed -- the work existed, the artifact
# existed, the gate record did not -- and named it as the argued-versus-indexed
# split one level up from the refutation register. This is the same audit on the
# Decoder's objective.
#
# MISSION's gate: "a written docs/re/ result with the evidence, and REFERENCE DATA
# COMMITTED ALONGSIDE IT". Two halves, and all ten questions read ✅ answered.
#
# HALF ONE -- every Q cites a docs/re/ result. All ten do:
# Q1 ui-keyframe-time-unit.md + ui-keyframe-record-layout.md
# Q2 ui-title-build-map.md
# Q3 structures/ui-paint-order-key.md + ui-paint-order-derived-check.md
# Q4 menu-navigation-semantics.md Q5 menu-navigation-semantics.md
# Q6 boot-config-and-gamepart-registry.md Q7 screen-transitions.md
# Q8 menu-audio-cues.md Q9 movie-binding.md
# Q10 structures/bgm-two-stems.md + slb-bank-header-not-a-wave.md
#
# HALF TWO -- reference data committed alongside. Every data/ and captures/ path
# cited by those pages was resolved against the tree:
#
# ui-keyframe-time-unit.md 3 cited, 0 missing
# ui-title-build-map.md 11 cited, 0 missing
# structures/ui-paint-order-key.md 11 cited, 0 missing
# menu-navigation-semantics.md 11 cited, 0 missing
# boot-config-and-gamepart-registry.md 3 cited, 0 missing
# screen-transitions.md 4 cited, 0 missing
# menu-audio-cues.md 2 cited, 0 missing
# movie-binding.md 2 cited, 0 missing
# structures/bgm-two-stems.md 1 cited, 0 missing
#
# And spot-checked for substance rather than mere existence, since the gate's
# PURPOSE is that the port can work without a disc:
# splash-ramp-check.txt 1 197 B 15 numeric lines
# fade-envelope-menu-to-title 2 373 B 34
# fade-four-transitions.txt 20 737 B 198
# se-cue-runtime-offsets.txt 2 258 B 17
# se-ui-cues.txt 7 134 B 324
# bgm-wave-census.txt 3 369 B 33
#
# ✅ CLEAN. Both halves present for all ten, and unlike the port's P0 they were
# also INDEXED -- HANDOFF's status table cites the page, the page cites the data.
#
# ⚠️ REACH, because a clean audit is only worth its checks. This tests that CITED
# files EXIST and are non-trivial. It does NOT test that the data supports the
# claim, and it cannot see data a page SHOULD have cited and did not. A page
# citing nothing would have passed as "0 missing"; none did, but the check would
# not have caught it. Existence and substance, not sufficiency.