Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sylpheed RE agent
4b676fc2e9 re: _EXn is the n-th challenge stage; the Extra0n join is refuted
Reading the docs first paid: unit-substructure-records already had
UN_e001_ADAN_Elan_EX4 and arsenal-item-weapon-chain already had _T_EX5_el, so
last pass's "the only two _EX5 names on the disc" was too narrow. Withdrawn and
replaced by a census.

Every name ENDING in _EX<digit> across all 41 archives, taken from parsed IDXD
record names, field names and string values (never a raw byte scan): 26 names,
two digits only - _EX4 (7 units, 6 ADAN + 1 TCAF) and _EX5 (4 TCAF units + 1
weapon), each with a UnitName_/WeaponCannonName_ twin.

The stage join is exact. _EX4 appears only in tables S27 declares
(EnumUnit_S27.tbl, UnitGroup_S27.tbl); _EX5 only in S28's (EnumUnit_S28.tbl,
UnitGroup_S28.tbl, EnumWeapon_EX5.tbl); the other 20 stages have neither. The
challenge missions are S24-S29 in order, so S27 is challenge #4 and S28 is
challenge #5: _EXn names the n-th challenge ("EXtra") mission's bespoke
variants. S28 declares both schemes at once - EnumUnit_S28.tbl by stage number,
EnumWeapon_EX5.tbl by challenge index, for the same mission.

Refuted: _EXn is not the Extra0n numbering. There are four Extra slots but _EX5
exists, and under that reading Extra04 would be S29, which has no _EX assets.

Makes available but does not settle result-screens' open "what does EX_ mean":
"the challenge-mission debriefing" fits its evidence that the EX_ twin drops
overview_rank/overview_medals. Recorded there as a reading, not adopted.

All fifteen artefacts byte-identical.
2026-08-28 04:34:11 +00:00
Claude (auto)
67b04a945e re: the debriefing and pilot-record screens; the save-screen block was already owned
Read-before-claiming caught one of the three.  savegame-format.md already
documents the shape AND this exact list -- the LOAD/SAVE screen's config key list
is compiled into the executable as a pointer array of key strings, run starting
0x820A0074.  sub_82286BC8's 18 names are that list (17/18 are a tables.pak field
or record).  Nothing new; residual PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10, not a tables.pak name.

The other two are new screens of the same shape and they close exactly.  All
names resolve into tables.pak: sub_822814D8 24/24, sub_8227A3A0 21/21.

sub_822814D8 = the debriefing screen.  24 = 2 screen ids (STAGE_RESULT,
EX_STAGE_RESULT) + 21 stage_* fields + one sound cue (SE_BOSS_CORE_CHARGE); the
tables.pak STAGE_RESULT record has exactly 21 fields.

sub_8227A3A0 = the pilot record / career screen.  21 = 5 screen ids (LAST_RESULT,
EX_BASE, EX_MAIN, EX_OVERVIEW, OVERVIEW) + 7 ex_overview_* + 9 overview_*; the
records EX_OVERVIEW and OVERVIEW have exactly 7 and 9 fields.

2+21+1 = 24 and 5+7+9 = 21, with 21/7/9 measured independently off the pak.

The debriefing readout is nine num/points pairs plus three points-only lines:
kills by class, objectives, clear time, shoot-down ratio and both damage
categories carry a raw count and its score contribution, while friendly_fire,
shoot_down_others and weight have no counter column -- the same partition
mission-scoring.md measures on the settings side.  OVERVIEW is the seven
EX_OVERVIEW fields plus overview_rank and overview_medals.

Not settled: what EX_ means (its ids have no record of that name), and
PLAYER_AMMO_LESS_10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
2026-08-27 22:38:56 +00:00