Resolving every string sub_822F9498 references, in code order, gives 90, and they
are exactly the 890e1be4 object's schema in its record order: Misc (5 effect
names), SpecialAttack (+17), TacticalManeuver (+7), SpecialWeapon (+8), Booster
(+50). It never names Generic, Maneuver, Explosion, Shield or StructureCount, and
the string Maneuver has 0 xrefs. One call site, from sub_821A6CF0, which is
itself called once and references the literal PlayerParams.
CORRECTION to unit-datasheet-static.md, which calls sub_822F9498 the
unit-definition loader. It loads one object: the player parameter table. Its
AA_/AV_ interleave still stands as a struct layout, but the struct is
PlayerParams's Booster record, not each unit's Maneuver. What loads the 114 unit
Maneuver records is now an open question -- it uses none of these strings.
Ranking all 114 units by how many of Booster's 50 values they reproduce: the top
five are exactly the five _Player units, all at 39/50; the sixth drops to 13/50;
none matches 50/50. The five players agree with each other on all 50 -- the three
player ships share one flight model. Booster stands alone on 10 fields; the
eleventh, AA_Yaw_Max, is 65.0 vs 65, formatting not a value (last iteration's
"11 differ" over-counted).
Still open, and sharper: nothing selects Booster. PlayerParams is loaded once,
unconditionally, no branch -- yet the measured flight tracks the unit Maneuver
(1.25/1.20/1.28) and misses Booster badly. Both cannot govern the same craft; the
next test is a runtime watch.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
Route 3 (call-graph bound): sub_821A6CF0 and sub_821AB650 each read 196/200/204
off THREE different base registers -- three unrelated objects, not the block.
Route 4 (data-flow bound): the definition object lives in the global at
0x828F358C; 18 functions touch it, 9 also touch block offsets. The two best
are refuted -- sub_8230D1F8 is the rank/score loader storing
CraftScore_Adjustment, FFPenalty_Zessel_Maximum and RankScore_S/A/B at exactly
256/320/324/328/332, and sub_82398CC0 uses r19 as a float-constant pool.
So the offset region is shared by two unrelated objects and a constant pool:
offset-based discrimination is contaminated by construction, which is why it
has now failed three times. Catching the selection needs a runtime watch.
Side finding, unowned by the corpus: sub_8230D1F8 is the rank/score loader.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
sub_822F9498 (the unit-definition loader, called only from sub_821A6CF0) is the
only function referencing the AA_/AV_ name strings. Mapping each name to the
stfs that follows gives an exact interleave: AV_ at X, AA_ at X+8, for all five
axes -- PitchPlus 196/204, PitchMinus 212/220, Yaw 228/236, Roll 244/252,
AxisMode 320/328. A selector is an offset of 0 or 8, not two lookups.
The 20 strings exist twice in the image; the first block is referenced by
nothing. Data control: the ten suffixes match exactly between families.
The selection stays a reading: functions loading two or more of 196/204/320/328
number 39 image-wide, and only two are call-graph-reachable from the loader.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
Yesterday's page said "Generic (394 per pak) is the unit datasheet".
Only 114 of the 394 are. Every IDXD file carries exactly one Generic
record and its schema is set by what kind of file it is. Partitioned
by field set, identically in all six GP_MAIN_GAME_*.pak:
114 has HP -- a unit datasheet
204 {Count} only -- a dialogue file
64 {ID, Name, SideID, Unique} -- a character (36 TCAF + 28 ADAN)
10 {EnumAsteroidGroup} -- an asteroid group
2 degenerate
204+114+64+10+2 = 394, and 178 distinct Generic.ID = 114 unit + 64
character, the only two shapes carrying an ID. That settles the
"178 IDs vs 394 records" question the previous entry left open.
Positive control in the same loop: for the 204 dialogue headers Count
equals the number of Message_NNN siblings, 204/204, zero mismatches.
Cross-check from the other side: Maneuver = 114, Effect = 114, the
carrying-entry sets are identical, every unit Generic has a Maneuver
sibling, and Generic.Type splits 43 Craft + 71 Vessel -- the same
43/71/114 unit-struct-runtime.md reached from live guest memory.
New tool generic_partition.py + artefact; ISL artefacts byte-identical.
Same technique as the weapon tables -- field names are literal, so a
field-shape search over 190782 records finds the carriers.
Generic (394 per pak, 110 field names, 178 distinct IDs) is the unit
datasheet: HP, ShieldRatio, DefencePoint, AttackCraft/VesselPoint, the
five Resistance* terms, Size_X/Y/Z + radius, RadarRange 10000,
FCSRange 8500, MountedFCS, MountedShieldGenerator, Score/Damage/Mass,
NozzleCount with per-nozzle FX, and Model rou_e006 -- which ties the
sheet to the mesh names the corpus already decodes.
Maneuver (114) is the AI flight model: MaximumVelocity 1200,
CruisingVelocity 700, Acceleration 600, Deceleration 400,
SideThrustAcceleration 1000, Turn_AngularVelocity 180,
MaximumBank_Normal 60, per-axis DragFactor 3.0, afterburner and
reverse-thrust factors, plus nine named manoeuvres each with its own
timing/ratio/length bounds and AA_/AV_ rate pairs. This is the static
source for what flight-speed-law.md measured at runtime.
Corrects a guess in the same pass: HP_CLASS/HP_ID are not ship stats --
they sit on records named for wingmen and ship classes alongside
HPGauge/RadarCursorType, i.e. a HUD gauge binding table.
New structure doc + artefact; ISL artefacts byte-identical.
