Closes the page's one explicitly outstanding result. Run in sylph-ci:local
(rustc 1.98.1, byte-identical to the runner) with the disc present and
--no-fail-fast: 45 suites, 367 passed, 1 failed, 14 ignored. The +9 against the
disc-less #35 run (377) is exactly #35's nine imports.rs unit tests.
The single failure is ui_prm_primitives_disc, red on main since #23 and
bisected there, not introduced by #32.
Records the three things that stopped the number being obtained, as rules:
--no-fail-fast (an earlier run silently covered half the workspace), a memory
cap sized to the host (the default 7 GB OOM-kills slb_leading_segment_disc on
this machine with the disc mounted), and a ~36 GB disk budget for a cold target
volume.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Re-checked against the server rather than the page. `Sylpheed` has 7 tags and
all 7 are `formats-pin-*`. The eighth this page counts, `formats-pin-2026-08-29`
without a letter suffix, is in `Syplheed-Reborn` — a repo a Sylpheed rewrite
would not touch, and one Phase 5 archives read-only regardless.
The pin itself is exactly as claimed: `formats-pin-2026-09-01` resolves to
`1cd5b8b1`, and the in-container build fetches that git dependency over the
network for real, so the blocker is live rather than theoretical.
Also updates the disk figures the "don't rewrite" recommendation rests on: 90%
used and 96 GB free, not 83% and 154 GB, with `target/` at 34 GB. The
recommendation is unchanged and the argument is now stronger — reclaiming
118 MB by rewriting history while 34 GB of rebuildable output sits beside it is
the wrong lever.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This page says not to trust its own ledger on arrival, so the checks were run
again rather than read. Nothing was archived and nothing was deleted — both are
the human's, and both phases stay open.
The substantive finding is that Phase 5's containment check is the wrong test
for half the list it names. `xenia-rs` and `xex2tractor` were never absorbed;
their disposition is harvest-then-archive. Run the check literally against
`xenia-rs` and it returns 42 of 42 refs "not present in Sylpheed" — every line
true, every line unactionable, which is the failure this page already names
once about Phase 0's first gate. For those two the invariant is that the
harvested artefacts are in Sylpheed and the repository is archived rather than
deleted; that is now checked separately, and it shows the harvest is real but
lives only on the unmerged PR branches, so Phase 5 should follow them rather
than precede them.
Containment itself holds for the two repos it does apply to: 21/21 and 2/2.
Also answers Phase 7's one open question — nothing cites `texcompare/`, and all
four `ship_render` citations name the example program, not the output
directory — and records that most of Phase 7's list does not exist on this
machine, that `has_wiki: true` is a flag rather than content (all six wikis
return 404, never initialised), and that the disk is at 90%, not the 83% the
page records.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This page recorded it as "not changed here, because the right replacement is a
decision". The decision was taken: PR #35 `38cc170` resolves `$SYLPH_XEXDB`,
then `<repo root>/sylpheed.db`, then refuses with both named — no third
fallback, because the database is an untracked build artefact and a default
that silently resolves to the wrong one is worse than no default.
Leaving the page saying otherwise would be the defect this section is about.
`SCHEMA.md`'s retired-repo heading is still outstanding and stays listed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Found 2026-09-14 while pulling the repos on the other machine: `xenia-rs` had
468 uncommitted lines plus an untracked 338-line `imports.rs` in the very crate
Phase 3 lifted, written 2026-09-10 and sitting there for four days. Verified
absent from `iterate-4A` and from the lifted crate in PR #32 — it existed in
exactly one place, and that place was not git.
Phase 0 is titled "Secure the single-copy work" and its gate passed anyway,
because the gate iterates `refs/heads` and a dirty working tree has no ref.
Canary's two dirty files were secured only because a human already knew about
them; nothing found them. Phase 1 then declared the archive honest while this
sat beside the branches it pushed. Phase 5 ends with "delete the local clone"
and Phase 7 drops the emulator, so a deletion was scheduled against it.
Records: the finding and the `git status --porcelain` half the gate was
missing (run across all four repos — only Canary is dirty, and both entries are
already on Phase 7's drop list); that it is secured on `harvest/import-thunk-
naming` and ported in `feat/xexdb-import-naming`; a fifth entry in the
wrong-claims list; and a `0b` row in the status table.
Also records three pieces of Phase 3 residue found while porting, the sharpest
being that `tools/zq.py` still defaults its database path to a location inside
`xenia-rs` — the repository Phase 5 archives and Phase 7 drops. Left unchanged:
the right replacement is a decision, not a guess.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
