docs(re): adopt the homeless disc-contents page, re-measured #56
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "docs/adopt-disc-contents"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Closes the last consolidation orphan:
GAME_CONTENTS.mdsat in the workspace root through the whole consolidation, adopted by neither repo. The corpus documents formats in depth but never said what files the disc holds and where they sit.Re-measured, not transcribed — and that caught a real error
⚠️ The source placed
resource3d/,DefTablesandMiscBinunderdat/. All three are inhidden/— which is exactly whySYLPHEED_RES3Dpoints athidden/resource3d. Transcribing would have committed a wrong tree.Re-verified against the retail extract on 2026-09-18: top-level layout,
dat/71 entries (33.pak/.p00pairs,sound.p00–.p04,movie/with 97.wmv+ six language packs),hidden/5 entries (166resource3dfiles), theconfig.inilanguage table, andmedia_id0x2D2E2EEBread from the XEX header.Half the source was dropped, deliberately
It predates the format work and phrased speculation as status —
dat/*.pakmarked "Unknown, magic bytes TBD" when the container is ✅ decoded disc-wide, a table guessing each archive's contents from its name, and an "RE Entry Points" section recommending Ghidra where we now usesylpheed.db.Carrying that forward would put claims into the corpus that the corpus has already refuted — the failure mode
README.mdexplicitly warns about. The page records what was dropped and why, and points atINDEX.mdas the single authority on format status rather than starting a second table that would drift.Checks
tools/re/check-capture-citations— selftest ok (7/7), scan 212/212 captures cited, 0 dangling.