Files
Sylpheed/docs/re/README.md
sim ac0ad579fd chore: retire the last dead paths and names from the consolidation
Nothing here changes what a tool computes; it changes where tools look.

- tools/re-capture: 33 censuses globbed /work/sylph_extract, a path that has
  existed nowhere since /work became a clone, so they matched nothing and
  printed empty results. They now resolve the disc through a new disc.py
  from $SYLPHEED_DISC and exit loudly without it (the #44 fix, generalised).
  Nine scripts that imported siblings from the retired Reborn checkout or an
  old session scratchpad now import from their own directory. unitgroup.py
  only needs the variable when --pak is not given.
- sylpheed-xex: the loader only ever uses the XEX2 retail key. The dead
  devkit key and a doc comment claiming a devkit fallback that does not
  exist are gone; Project Sylpheed is a retail XEX2, so no XEX1 key either.
- sylpheed-viewer: real_font_rasterizes looked for /tmp/sylph_extract and so
  always skipped. It reads $SYLPHEED_DISC now, and passes against the disc.
- Comments and docs that named xenia-rs, the Reborn repository or /work/*.pe
  as places to look now name sylpheed.db, Canary's ppc_context.h and the
  flat .pe; docs/re/README.md no longer says the native Canary build does not
  run.

Historical records keep their original paths: findings that were measured
against /work/xenia-rs/sylpheed.db still say so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 22:30:28 +02:00

115 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Reverse-engineering knowledge base
This directory is the **spec-side** of the clean-room: it records what the original
*Project Sylpheed* binary **does** (behaviour) and how its **data is laid out**, so that
the Rust port can be implemented **from these specs** without re-deriving anything and
without ever copying original code.
It exists to answer one question fast: *"do we already know how X works, and how sure are we?"*
---
## The one rule that matters
> **Never document a claim more confidently than the evidence supports, and never
> paste original code here.**
A wrong-but-confident note is worse than no note: someone builds on it and the bug hides
for weeks. Every entry therefore carries an explicit **confidence** and its **evidence**.
This mirrors the project method — *measure the oracle, never infer; refute before believing.*
### Clean-room firewall
- ✅ Allowed: behaviour descriptions, field offsets/types, formulas, state machines,
observed input→output pairs, and **references** to the original by address
(`sub_821B68C0`) or to `sylpheed.db`.
- ❌ Forbidden here and in `crates/`: pasted decompiled C/C++ or verbatim disassembled
function bodies presented as the thing to reimplement. Cite the address; describe the
behaviour in your own words. Disassembly is a tool for *understanding*, not a source to copy.
---
## Confidence levels
| Level | Meaning | Bar to reach it |
|-------|---------|-----------------|
| `CONFIRMED` | Behaviour verified against ground truth. | ≥2 independent observations **or** one observation cross-checked against an oracle (canary framebuffer, a known-correct value, a second code path). |
| `PROBABLE` | Strong single-source inference. | One clean observation, or an unambiguous static read of the disassembly. |
| `HYPOTHESIS` | Educated guess, not yet tested. | Anything else. Must say what would confirm/refute it. |
### The status markers
The table above is the *confidence* scale. The markers that appear in
`BACKLOG.md` and the `structures/` pages are a separate, and until now undefined,
vocabulary. They mean:
| Marker | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ✅ | Confirmed — verified against ground truth. |
| 🟡 | Partial: true as far as it goes, or true under a stated assumption. |
| ❔ | Open question. Nobody has answered it yet. |
| 🔴 | **Refuted** — shown false — **or blocked by something the container cannot do.** |
| ❌ | A specific claim that was tried and failed. Prefer 🔴. |
| 🚧 | Work started and not finished. |
**🔴 never means "we have not run it yet."** That is ❔ or 🚧. Reserve 🔴's
"blocked" sense for a real limit of the box — no push credentials, no hardware
Vulkan (lavapipe only), or a decision only the user can make. The box *can* run
the emulator, script input, screenshot, read guest memory, and build and test
Rust, so "needs a run" is never a blocker. This paragraph exists because the
marker was undefined for 98 uses and three of them were mislabelled that way.
**Promotion requires new evidence, not re-reading the old evidence.** A `HYPOTHESIS` that
"looks right again" is still a `HYPOTHESIS`. Only an *independent* check promotes it.
If evidence later contradicts an entry, **demote it and record the contradiction** — do
not silently edit the conclusion.
---
## When to document
- **Right after** a function/structure crosses from `HYPOTHESIS` to at least `PROBABLE`
before moving to the next code path, so the knowledge isn't lost or re-derived.
- **Whenever confidence changes** (up or down) — append to the Evidence log, don't overwrite.
- **Not** while it's still a pure guess with no evidence — a one-liner in the relevant
backlog/plan is enough until there's something to stand on.
## What to document
- **Functions/code paths** → `docs/re/functions/<name>.md` (one file per function or tight cluster).
- **Data structures / formats** → `docs/re/structures/<name>.md`.
- Keep the index in [`INDEX.md`](INDEX.md) (one line each: name · confidence · one-line summary).
Use the templates: [`_TEMPLATE.function.md`](_TEMPLATE.function.md),
[`_TEMPLATE.structure.md`](_TEMPLATE.structure.md).
---
## How we find and confirm code paths (the toolchain)
Everything joins on the **guest virtual address (PC)** — code addresses are fixed by the
XEX load, identical across our emulator and canary.
- **Static (cheap, try first):** `sylpheed.db` at the repository root (DuckDB: 25 676
functions, xrefs, strings, vtables, imports; git-ignored — build it with
`sylph-xexdb dis <ISO> --db sylpheed.db --analyze sql --quiet`, then re-stamp names with
`tools/apply_re_symbols.sql`). Query with `tools/zq.py``zq.py grep <str>`,
`zq.py xref <addr>`, `zq.py dis <lo> <hi>`, `zq.py fn <pc>`. Entry points are usually a
**string** (`zq.py grep MSG_DEMO`) or an **import** (movie/XMA API) xref'd back to the loader.
- **Dynamic (when static is ambiguous):** Xenia Canary, below. The `xenia-rs` probe suite
this bullet used to recommend (`--pc-probe`, `--mem-watch`, `--lr-trace`,
`--dump-addr`) went with that emulator when it was retired on 2026-09-16. For static
`.rdata` reads that `--dump-addr` served, read the `.pe` directly: it is a flat VA dump,
file offset = `VA 0x82000000`.
- **Oracle (correctness ground truth):** canary, in either of two builds — the **Wine
cross-build** in `xenia-canary/build-cross/bin/Windows/Debug/` (launched by
`run-canary-safe.sh`) or the **native Linux build** in `xenia-canary-native/` (launched by
`run-canary-native-safe.sh`). This is the only emulator that reaches the in-game menu; our
retired `xenia-rs` never got past the intro video. Use canary to *observe output*
(capture its framebuffer for texture colours), not usually to instrument code — though both
builds compile, so small C++ probes + rebuild are possible when needed.
Run **muted, one emulator process at a time**, point it at the real ISO.
> ⚠️ **VA-equality caveat:** join **code** by PC (fixed), but **never** assume a data VA
> holds the same bytes across emulators — allocators differ. Compare data by content/layout.