062e17bf34
Refutes a framing of mine that two documents and the port s exporter were built on, so it is a new page rather than an edit. voice-region-leading-chunk.md read a long cue s three streams as three presentations of one take, and from that came the instruction "take one stream, do not sum", which the port implemented. The open question was which presentation the game plays. It has no answer. Booted with --xma_param_probe=true, the cvar whose own comment says it is keyed to reveal which sub-wave of a movie s .slb the game actually decodes. The guest opens three XMA contexts and decodes all three concurrently: ctx=0 packets=632 byte_size=1294336 ch=2 48000 ADV stream 1 ctx=1 packets=546 byte_size=1118208 ch=2 48000 ADV stream 2 ctx=2 packets=572 byte_size=1171456 ch=2 48000 ADV stream 3 Byte-exact against the three streams payloads taken independently off the disc (RIFF size minus 60). Only these three contexts appear in the run. So a consumer that picks one discards two thirds of what the game mixes. Both "three presentations of one take" and "take one stream" are withdrawn -- and the previous behaviour is not thereby right either, because an equal-gain 1/n sum of channel pairs is not a downmix and the port s measured 6.02 dB loss was real. Neither rule is established; a consumer is authoring. Three concurrent stereo streams is six channels and N stereo streams is how XMA carries multichannel on the 360, which would also explain the 1-or-3-never-2 span census. Recorded as a hypothesis, not a result: all three fmt chunks declare ChannelMask 0x0002 identically, which is not what distinct channel roles should look like. Everything byte-level survives: the leading chunk being stream 1 clipped by our own guard, the 70 + 8 + 17 decomposition, the bank-header discriminator. Reach: one cue, one boot. That 28 cues are 3-stream is decoded; that all three decode concurrently is measured on ADV alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QsEPXWVaEpyfudtR6re1Pd
99 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
99 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
# 🔴 A voice cue's three streams are DECODED TOGETHER — they are not alternative presentations
|
||
|
||
**Classification: measured.** Xenia Canary, `--xma_param_probe=true`, one boot
|
||
into the intro movie, 2026-08-29. Log excerpt committed at
|
||
[`data/voice-three-streams-runtime.txt`](../data/voice-three-streams-runtime.txt).
|
||
|
||
**This refutes a framing of mine that two documents and the port's exporter were
|
||
built on**, so it is written as its own page rather than as an edit.
|
||
|
||
## What was believed
|
||
|
||
[`voice-region-leading-chunk.md`](voice-region-leading-chunk.md) established that
|
||
a long voice cue's byte span holds **three** streams, and read them as *three
|
||
presentations of one take* — a defensible reading of the evidence then available
|
||
(they are the same duration, and their content correlates strongly). From it came
|
||
the instruction **"take one stream, do not sum"**, which the port implemented.
|
||
|
||
The open question was *which* presentation the game plays.
|
||
|
||
## What the game does
|
||
|
||
The question has no answer, because the premise is wrong. Canary's
|
||
`xma_param_probe` — a cvar whose own comment says it is keyed so as to reveal
|
||
"**WHICH sub-wave of a movie's `.slb` the game actually decodes**" — shows the
|
||
guest opening **three XMA contexts and decoding all three concurrently**:
|
||
|
||
| context | packets | `byte_size` | channels | rate | disc stream |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| **0** | 632 | **1 294 336** | 2 | 48 000 | `ADV` stream 1 (RIFF 1 294 396 − 60) |
|
||
| **1** | 546 | **1 118 208** | 2 | 48 000 | `ADV` stream 2 (1 118 268 − 60) |
|
||
| **2** | 572 | **1 171 456** | 2 | 48 000 | `ADV` stream 3 (1 171 516 − 60) |
|
||
|
||
**Three-way, byte-exact**, against sizes taken independently off the disc. Only
|
||
these three contexts appear in the run.
|
||
|
||
So the three streams are **simultaneous**, not alternative. A consumer that picks
|
||
one is discarding two thirds of what the game mixes.
|
||
|
||
## 🟡 The obvious reading is 5.1, and it is NOT established
|
||
|
||
Three concurrent **stereo** streams is six channels, and N stereo streams is
|
||
exactly how XMA carries multichannel audio on the 360. It would explain a lot at
|
||
once:
|
||
|
||
* the differing declared byte rates — different channel pairs, different content,
|
||
same encoder quality;
|
||
* the port's content measurements, which become measurements *of channels*:
|
||
`ADV` stream 2 is **mono-in-stereo** (one channel digitally silent — a centre
|
||
paired with a silent LFE looks exactly like that), stream 3 is **dual-mono**
|
||
(a centre-panned line in an L/R pair is L = R exactly), and `S00A`'s third
|
||
stream is **digital silence** (surrounds, on a dialogue-only cue);
|
||
* stream 3 measuring **0.60 ×** stream 2 with the residual 26.8 dB down — which
|
||
is what a correlated channel pair at a lower level looks like, and *not* only
|
||
what a duplicate looks like;
|
||
* ✅ and the census dichotomy already on record: inter-descriptor spans hold
|
||
**1 stream or 3, never 2** (258 and 28). If 3-stream is 5.1 and 1-stream is
|
||
mono/stereo, the missing 2 is the missing 4-channel configuration.
|
||
|
||
⚠️ **Against it**, and the reason this stays 🟡: all three `fmt ` chunks declare
|
||
`ChannelMask = 0x0002` **identically**, which is not what distinct channel roles
|
||
should look like. Either the mask is unset on this disc or the offset is
|
||
mis-taken; it is weak evidence either way, and no channel-role assignment is
|
||
claimed here.
|
||
|
||
❔ **Which stream is which channel pair is unknown.** Nothing measured here
|
||
assigns roles, and the port must not infer them from stream order.
|
||
|
||
## 🔴 What this withdraws
|
||
|
||
* **"Three presentations of one take"** — withdrawn. Three concurrent streams of
|
||
one take.
|
||
* **"Take one stream, do not sum"** — withdrawn. It was my instruction, the port
|
||
implemented it, and it discards two of three decoded streams.
|
||
⚠️ **This does not make the previous behaviour right either.** An equal-gain
|
||
`1/n` sum of channel pairs is not a downmix, and the port's measured 6.02 dB
|
||
loss from summing a silent stream was real. The correct handling needs the
|
||
channel roles, which are open. **Neither "pick one" nor "sum at 1/n" is
|
||
established; a consumer is authoring, and should say so.**
|
||
* **"Which presentation does the game play?"** — dissolved rather than answered.
|
||
|
||
✅ **What survives untouched:** every content measurement the port made, and the
|
||
byte-level structure in
|
||
[`voice-region-leading-chunk.md`](voice-region-leading-chunk.md) — the leading
|
||
chunk being stream 1 clipped by our own 1.5 MB guard, the 70 + 8 + 17
|
||
decomposition, the bank-header discriminator. Those are about bytes and they did
|
||
not depend on the framing.
|
||
|
||
## Reach
|
||
|
||
* **One cue, one boot.** `ADV` only. That 28 cues on the disc are 3-stream is
|
||
decoded from the bytes, but that all 28 decode concurrently is measured on
|
||
**one** of them.
|
||
* The probe fires on **first decode** per `(buffer ptr, packet count)`, so this
|
||
shows all three being *started*; it does not by itself prove they play to the
|
||
end in lockstep. Their equal durations and the port's sample-synchronous
|
||
correlation both point that way.
|
||
* Nothing here identifies the **mix** the guest applies downstream of the three
|
||
decoders.
|