Sylpheed port agent 14ec1c1df8 port: which-focus -- a focus detector for the Decoder, with the control wired in
S00A is blocked on knowing which button a screenshot has focused.
`newgame_path.sh` assumed NEW GAME at boot, drove on it, and landed in a tutorial
mission -- HANDOFF Q5 measured focus as UNSTABLE across boots. Counting presses
cannot substitute: up from the first item wraps to the last, so no fixed number
of presses lands on a known item from an unknown start.

The Decoder's own attempt, a per-row brightness statistic, FAILED the control --
it picked NEW GAME on the capture whose filename says OPTIONS. The
render-difference method passes it, so this packages it as a script.

IT RUNS THE CONTROL ON EVERY INVOCATION, not once when it was written, and
refuses to report anything if the control fails.

  live-main-menu-options-focused  KNOWN ANSWER      OPTIONS         4.7x
  live-main-menu                  the question      NEW GAME       11.4x
  live-extras                     KNOWN from corpus MISSION SELECT  4.2x
  live-title-press-a              no menu at all    refuses         1.0x

The extras row is a second known answer I did not plant -- authored/flow.json
already records "MEASURED: EXTRAS opens focused on MISSION SELECT
(live-extras.png)" -- and the tool reaches it independently. The title row is the
negative control.

AND THE REFUSAL NOW CARRIES A NON-ZERO EXIT CODE. The first version printed "do
not act on this" and exited 0, so a caller scripting it -- which is the entire
point -- would have read a refusal as an answer. Same defect as a checker
claiming a check it skipped, and the fifth instance of that shape this session.

What it is not: it identifies focus in ONE FRAME and says nothing about what
selects focus. Q5's instability stands.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
2026-08-29 17:29:48 +00:00

Sylpheed

A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).

Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:

The decoders crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide
The port port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads
The corpus docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends

You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.

The oracle is the real game

sylpheed-cli and the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.

This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.

Layout

crates/
  sylpheed-formats/   the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
  sylpheed-cli/       headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
  sylpheed-viewer/    the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
  sylpheed-export/    disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/                 the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/             decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
  base/               generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
  mods/               drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
  re/                 the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
  game/               how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
  port/               the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
  agents/             how the agent team works together
tools/                capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/             transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/               the agent containers

Where to start

Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.

Conventions

Confidence is per claim, never per document: CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE · HYPOTHESIS · REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 820 MiB
Languages
Rust 57.6%
Python 27.7%
Shell 10.6%
GDScript 3.5%
Dockerfile 0.4%
Other 0.1%