11aa4ec7cf
The activation decision is code, and MISSION already says the port authors the sequence -- so the useful move is to hand over the sequence measured rather than chase the code. From the 235-frame draw capture, at 1 frame = 1/30 s (2 units/frame, 1 unit = 1/60 s, both settled in Q1): publisher: SQUARE ENIX logo f1-90 90 frames 3.00 s+ at 0.00 (gap, nothing drawn) f91-93 3 frames 0.10 s at 3.00 developer: both glows f94-115 22 frames 0.73 s at 3.10 developer: both logos f116-211 96 frames 3.20 s at 3.83 Three limits, stated with the numbers rather than after them. The capture opens with palogo_sqex already at a=255, so the publisher phase began before the window and 3.00 s is a FLOOR -- every "starts at" is relative to the capture, not to boot. palogo_anima and palogo_anima_eff get 0 draws in all 214 frames, so a third pair's phase is not in this measurement. And it is one capture, one run: the glow->logo switch being a single frame boundary with no overlap is a strong shape, but each duration is one sample. What is solid is the part that matters: the 0.73 s and 3.20 s phases are each within 2% of their element's declared span, so the durations are the bundle's own and only the ordering is authored. That is the difference between a port transcribing timing and inventing it.
721 B
721 B