sylpheed-port's point: a control that runs where the tool does not look proves nothing about the tool. Case 2 plants a revival INSIDE the scanned root and demands exit 1; a new case plants the same text OUTSIDE it and demands exit 0. The pair asserts the scan boundary is real rather than leaving it to be reasoned about -- which is how I had it, correctly but only in my head. Verified first by hand: identical plant text gives exit 1 inside the root and 0 outside it. Five cases now, all passing, and the real corpus still runs clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
10 KiB
Executable File
10 KiB
Executable File