Sylpheed port agent 49a6333166 port: free the canvas items I leaked, and refute the blend measurement's reach sentence
The RenderingServer rewrite leaked 5 CanvasItem RIDs per run -- exactly the number
of paint-order runs on the main menu. Items created through the server are not
owned by the node; a child Node2D would have been collected for me, and the reason
for not using one is the reason this had to be paid for. Freed in _exit_tree.

Nothing failed. verify-capture was green on every screen and the pictures were
right; the leak line sat next to "N ObjectDB instances were leaked at exit", which
BLOCKED.md records as engine-side and not ours after releasing every reference the
port owns moved the count not at all. A new leak line beside a known-benign one is
close to perfect camouflage. What distinguished it was the number: 5 is a count of
my bands.

Refutation, and it lands. ui-blend-mode-measured.md closes "every element on the
two screens the port ships is in the table except the two above and pteff10".
Checked against my export, counting the summary table's prose rows as coverage:
exactly right for main_menu, and on EXTRAS it misses four -- ptframe4, pteff21,
pteff22, pteff23. Five, not one.

They are not an arbitrary four. They are precisely the elements the port now
measures as the worst on that screen, ptframe4 at 16.19x the frame mean. Every
measured row still stands and the port has transcribed all of them; what is wrong
is the reach, and it is the difference between "one loose end" and the open ask in
BLOCKED.md, which now says so.

Secondary, offered as such: "every button" in the summary row is a class
generalisation in a document that warns its reader to take the table as per-element
facts. No button appears in the EXTRAS draw log at all. Very likely right, nothing
of mine depends on it.
2026-08-31 06:47:21 +00:00

Sylpheed

A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).

Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:

The decoders crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide
The port port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads
The corpus docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends

You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.

The oracle is the real game

sylpheed-cli and the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.

This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.

Layout

crates/
  sylpheed-formats/   the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
  sylpheed-cli/       headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
  sylpheed-viewer/    the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
  sylpheed-export/    disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/                 the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/             decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
  base/               generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
  mods/               drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
  re/                 the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
  game/               how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
  port/               the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
                      -- and RUNNING.md, which is how you actually start it
  agents/             how the agent team works together
tools/                capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/             transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/               the agent containers

Where to start

Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.

Conventions

Confidence is per claim, never per document: CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE · HYPOTHESIS · REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 820 MiB
Languages
Rust 57.6%
Python 27.7%
Shell 10.6%
GDScript 3.5%
Dockerfile 0.4%
Other 0.1%