The port's authored/flow.json stamped title/on_cancel_why = 'MEASURED, HANDOFF Q5' for a clause whose evidence cell in the source table reads 'none'. It did not invent that: HANDOFF's Q5 row opened with one **measured** covering six clauses of different strength, and HANDOFF is the document it authors against. Split per clause. Measured: initial focus varies; up/down move one item per press and wrap both ends; left/right do nothing; B on a submenu restores focus 4/4; B on the main menu goes to the title in <= 0.4 s with no loading screen. NOT measured, evidence cell empty: 'no auto-repeat at the durations tried', and 'B on the title -> nothing'. Both marked do-not-stamp. Also splits the source table's own up/down row, which bundled 'one item per press' (indirectly but soundly evidenced by the 4-press wrap count) with 'no auto-repeat' (nothing behind it, and the hedge was carrying the claim). METHOD entry: the failure is in summarising, not at either endpoint. The source table was honest and the consumer cited its source; flattening six claims into one adjective created a provenance nothing supports. A strength label is not distributive. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
5.8 KiB
Executable File
5.8 KiB
Executable File