59f3ac6846
The port asked whether the refined sweep fit t=357.7 was measured against live-title-build4-no-plate.png, because if so one of us is 42 units out. It was not. 357.7 was solved against title-draw-capture-vertex-colours.log, a GPU per-draw capture of the submitted vertex buffer -- four observables at once, two quad centres and two vertex alphas. No framebuffer, no PNG. The gap is not a fitting error either. Posing the leaves directly, t=400 misses the captured quads by +169.0 and -172.2 px. Probe control: it reproduces the page's published t=355 centres, 981 and 478, exactly. Refutation attempted and FAILED: I expected the port's fit to be minimised by the quad leaving the screen -- 'best fit' meaning 'draws least', the same shape as the .tbm control that could not fail. At t=400 quad B is fully on screen and quad A is 319 of 400 px. Their number is fitting something present and it survives. The real reason the two must differ is better than 'different frames'. The sweeps are nested records on a free-running loop and their cycles differ -- 600 and 720, read from the record header +0x08 -- while the top-level clock stops at settle. So two captures of the same settled title share a screen time and not a sweep phase, by construction. Consequence for the port: a sweep position does not date a frame; it gives a phase on a 600- or 720-unit loop. And 357.7 is a joint fit over both leaves while the port's ~400 poses one, so the two are not comparable in kind -- the phases coincide only every LCM 3 600 units. Discriminator handed to the port rather than taken: if its ~400 is pteff03 and the frame is in the first cycle, pteff03a must be at centre 295 in that same frame. The fit is against its renderer, so it owns the check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wuu56cE8vJGTBtn1ppsk8v
Sylpheed
A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).
Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:
| The decoders | crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide |
| The port | port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads |
| The corpus | docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends |
You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.
The oracle is the real game
sylpheed-cliand the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.
This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.
Layout
crates/
sylpheed-formats/ the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
sylpheed-cli/ headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
sylpheed-viewer/ the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
sylpheed-export/ disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/ the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/ decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
base/ generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
mods/ drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
re/ the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
game/ how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
port/ the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
agents/ how the agent team works together
tools/ capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/ transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/ the agent containers
Where to start
docs/re/INDEX.md— what is decodeddocs/re/REFUTED.md— what has been tested and dieddocs/re/METHOD.md— traps this project has already paid fordocs/game/navigation.md— how the game is navigateddocs/port/MODDING.md— why the asset tree looks the way it does
Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.
Conventions
Confidence is per claim, never per document: ✅ CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE ·
❔ HYPOTHESIS · ❌ REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning
rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.