8994ca7c59
The Decoder closed it by ADDING OBSERVABLES, not by tuning. The vertex buffer carries positions and colours at the same instant, so all four quantities must agree on one t: quad A x solves to 357.88 and quad B x to 357.58, both +/-0.12 units, against 355.75 +/-1.54 and 354.09 +/-1.89 from the alphas. Alpha moves only 0.27-0.33 levels per unit, so one byte of quantisation is worth 1.5-1.9 units -- 6-8 px of sweep at 4 px/unit. That is the whole of the 11.5 px. At t=357.7 the centres land within 0.70 px and both alphas inside one level. THE LESSON IS THE EARLIER ONE INVERTED AND IT IS THE HALF WORTH KEEPING. Checking a wrong rule against alpha made it look confirmed; here the same insensitivity MANUFACTURED a residual that did not exist. An insensitive quantity does not merely fail to falsify -- it invents error. Solve on the fastest-moving field, check the slow one, never the reverse. I was already looking for a pivot rule to explain 11.5 px when they wrote; there was nothing to find. REFUTATION ATTEMPT, survived with a nuance: they state the leaf pivot is (200,90) on a 399x180 sprite, "the pivot is the centre, so rotation displaces it by nothing". Checked against my export -- pivot [200,90], sprite 399x180, true centre 199.5,90. It survives, but the sprite is ODD-WIDTH so the pivot is the centre to within half a pixel rather than exactly. No consequence against their 0.70 px agreement; worth stating because "displaces it by nothing" is the kind of sentence that later gets leaned on for a sub-pixel claim. verify-capture now poses the title at t=357.7 rather than 355: RMSE 21.07 -> 20.92, differing 1.82% -> 1.81%. Marginal, and it is the right pose for a stated reason rather than a better number. AND ptlogo_eff2 IS WITHHELD FOR A BETTER REASON THAN MINE. I had it on caution about untested generalisation; the Decoder points out it is on title_jp and MISSION section 7 scopes out "localisation beyond English", so it is not a question this port has to answer and the parked Japanese capture does not need reviving for it. authored/rendering.json now gives scope first and undecidability second. Widening scope to close a residual would have been the wrong trade. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7FiFFFwbvG2uxdcEh8HyF
53 lines
2.6 KiB
JSON
53 lines
2.6 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"format": "sylpheed.rendering/1",
|
|
"_": [
|
|
"WHICH decoded rules the runtime applies where. AUTHORED because it is a",
|
|
"choice about the REACH of somebody else's decode, not about the disc.",
|
|
"Delete an entry the day the decode covers the case outright.",
|
|
"",
|
|
"The exporter flags `leaf_carries_geometry` on 15 elements -- those whose",
|
|
"nested `.rat` leaf declares a scale or rotation the parent does not. That",
|
|
"flag is a CENSUS FACT and it is emitted for all 15. What is DECODED is",
|
|
"narrower: the Decoder fitted the game's own composed alpha (per-draw vertex",
|
|
"colours C3FFFFFF / B6FFFFFF = 195 and 182) against the ptloop leaves and got",
|
|
"one consistent time, then PREDICTED the quad centres to ~11 px. That covers",
|
|
"`ptloop01` and `ptloop02` and nothing else."
|
|
],
|
|
"draw_leaf_for": [
|
|
"ptloop01",
|
|
"ptloop02"
|
|
],
|
|
"draw_leaf_why": [
|
|
"The two the decode covers. `docs/re/structures/ui-leaf-vs-parent-alpha.md`.",
|
|
"",
|
|
"NOT DRAWN, though the exporter flags them and ships their data:",
|
|
"",
|
|
" `title_jp/ptlogo_eff2` -- OUT OF SCOPE, which is a better reason than",
|
|
" the caution this entry first gave. MISSION section 7 scopes out",
|
|
" 'localisation beyond English', and this element exists only on the",
|
|
" Japanese title. So it is not a thing the menu port has to answer, and the",
|
|
" parked Japanese-locale capture does not need reviving on its account --",
|
|
" that is the human's call and not something either agent widens quietly.",
|
|
"",
|
|
" It is ALSO undecidable here even if it were in scope. Its 125% is a POP,",
|
|
" not a steady scale: scale-0 -> 125% -> scale-0 between t=50 and t=107,",
|
|
" about 0.95 s. The leaf draws at 100%, as two superimposed copies at alpha",
|
|
" 160 and 80, each rotating 360 degrees over 960 units -- 16 s a turn. If",
|
|
" parent scale gates the leaf it is a 0.95 s flash; if the leaf runs free it",
|
|
" spins for 16 s. Nothing on the disc chooses and title_jp has no oracle",
|
|
" capture.",
|
|
" `build_12,15/pgloading_loop5` -- leaf scale (0,0). A zero scale is one of",
|
|
" the three historical failures this corpus names, so it is exactly where a",
|
|
" guess is most expensive.",
|
|
"",
|
|
"AND THERE IS NO WAY TO ADJUDICATE EITHER HERE. `title_jp` has no oracle",
|
|
"capture, and `verify-screen` compares against `sylpheed-cli`, which does not",
|
|
"draw leaves at all -- so ANY leaf drawing increases that divergence whether",
|
|
"it is right or wrong. Its max went 155 -> 232 when they were drawn, and that",
|
|
"number is not evidence in either direction.",
|
|
"",
|
|
"What deletes this list: a decode covering those cases, or an oracle capture",
|
|
"of title_jp."
|
|
]
|
|
}
|