Files
Sylpheed/docs/re/REFUTED.md
Sylpheed RE agent e1dcc689bc agent: move the loop prompt's memory into the corpus, and let it push
The autonomous agent's loop prompt had grown to ~9 000 words of accumulated
findings, refutations and traps. That is a symptom, not a style: it was doing
the job the corpus should do, in the one place that dies with the container.
Three concrete failures followed from it, and each gets a structural fix rather
than a louder instruction.

1. IT REPEATED WORK IT HAD ALREADY DONE.
   The "do not revive" list and the method traps existed ONLY in the prompt, so
   nothing pointed a fresh iteration at them. Extracted verbatim into two
   tracked files:

     docs/re/REFUTED.md  105 claims tested and dead, grouped by subject so a
                         grep for your noun finds the neighbourhood
     docs/re/METHOD.md   the traps already paid for -- controls, inference,
                         searching, reading data, runtime

   Both are linked from INDEX.md, and the loop prompt now opens by requiring
   them to be read. This is the fix for "re-derived something already known":
   the knowledge is now where the next iteration looks, not in a context window.

2. IT FORGOT TO ARM THE NEXT WAKEUP.
   The prompt tried to solve this by shouting at itself in the first line. The
   real fix is to stop asking: `loose` now defaults to a FIXED interval (45m),
   so the harness owns the cadence and a forgotten ScheduleWakeup cannot end the
   run. SYLPH_LOOP_INTERVAL= (empty) restores self-pacing.

3. IT COULD NOT PUBLISH, SO THE WORK ONLY EXISTED IN THE CONTAINER.
   New `push-work`, plus a read-only credentials mount
   (SYLPH_GIT_CREDENTIALS, default ~/.sylph-git-credentials). It pushes the
   CURRENT branch only, refuses anything that is not auto/*, and never
   force-pushes -- so the consolidated line stays a human's decision and a
   confused iteration cannot rewrite history. The loop prompt now requires a
   push on every iteration that commits, rather than at the end of some longer
   arc, which is exactly when a container dies.

The prompt itself drops from ~9 000 words to 85 lines and, more importantly,
stops accumulating: findings go in the corpus, and the prompt points at it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 15:46:59 +02:00

186 lines
9.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Refuted — claims that were tested and died
**Read this before proposing a hypothesis.** Every line below was believed at
some point, measured, and found false. Reviving one costs a whole iteration and
produces nothing.
This file exists because the list had been living in the autonomous agent's
*loop prompt* — the only copy, lost the moment the container was. A refuted
result is a real result; it belongs in the corpus like any other.
**Format:** each entry is the claim as it was believed. Where the true answer is
known it follows after `→`. Grouped by subject so a grep for your noun finds the
neighbourhood, not just the line.
---
## Offsets, structs and the progress singleton
* `position = instance 0x12c` → refuted.
* `+0x29d0` → refuted.
* "an offset intersection can find a struct's consumer" → **only for LARGE or
unusual offsets.** Small ones have no power (`+184`: 301/351/115 hits).
* "a `+1956` store means a progress write" → writes go through the COPY, not
direct stores. 9 direct stores, none of them a progress write.
* "the singleton-global filter can find progress writers" → it fails its own
control.
* "the progress copy destination is an `r1`-relative stack local" → it is a
**frame register**. The `r1` assumption returned 0 for all 21 candidates
*including the known-good* — the filter was killed by its own control.
* "word B's writer also stores the Time/Points record" → it does not.
* "the debriefing records the metric with the clear bit" → 44 calls, exactly two
strings (`DEBRIEFING`, `BASE_INFO`), no `Time`, no `Points`.
* "`0x820AF030` holds live state" → all 384 words constant; it is a
spawned-entity record, not live state.
## Screens, classes and RTTI
* "the RTTI route can name the anonymous classes" → 1 150 vtables: 1 150
`ANON_`, 0 `rtti_present`, 0 base classes.
* "the sibling vtable methods name the class" → they cannot.
* "`xrefs` can name the callers of a vtable method" → no.
* "the `ind_call` refutation voids existing corpus claims" → damage bounded,
4/4 caller claims verify. But **`xrefs.ind_call` is a CROSS PRODUCT** — always
filter `kind='call'`.
* "`BASE_INFO` marks the 5-slot screen family" → it discriminates
screen-config from table-read, 9/9 vs 10/10.
* "a high key count means a rich screen" → `sub_82297550` / `sub_822A2F00`'s 27
"keys" are coordinate pairs, i.e. a layout table.
* "`EX_` = the CHALLENGE-mission debriefing" → `EX_` is **EXTRA**, mission-kind
3.
* "the `EX_` selection has not been shown" → it has: `[[obj+4]+184] == 3`.
## Stages, missions and the challenge set
* "the disc's stages are numbered 1..28" → S01S16 story, S17 **cut**, S18S23
tutorials, S24S29 challenge.
* "S24S29 are story missions" → they are the challenge missions.
* "the challenge missions have their own maps" → they reuse
`GP_MAIN_GAME_E.pak`'s stage records.
* "the challenge `REQUIREMENT` values are 16,25,26,27,29" → the chain is
16→24→25→26→27→28.
* "the `Extra0n` family shares one leaderboard metric" → `RECORD_TYPE` is
per-stage: 3 Time / 3 Points.
* "stage = filled SHAB count + 1" → refuted.
* "the first TRIGGER is always the point of no return" → refuted.
* "`EnumUnit_S14.tbl` might be missing" / "S14's 13 are a manifest omission" /
"asteroids are exempt from the manifest" → S14's 13 are **dangling
deployments**. NEEDS-HUMAN: fly S14.
* "`StageMessageSet_S02.tbl` is not in the pak" → it is.
* "`S28_p1` has an asteroid volume with no definition" → refuted.
* "`test_s8p1_asteroid.tbl` is test-only" → refuted.
* "the settings family has 28 or 29 objects" → 24.
## ISL / mission scripting
* "the bytecode is in the `.embsec_` sections" → refuted.
* "only 31 built-ins take a unit" → refuted.
* "`sub_8230C398` is the message pump" → refuted.
* "`bus+8216` is the subscriber registry" → refuted.
* "the ScriptPhase vtable is ≥200 slots" → 113.
## IDXD, paks and naming
* "IDXD record keys are `name_hash`" → record keys are **`tag_hash`**
(case-SENSITIVE); `name_hash` is case-INSENSITIVE and used for pak keys.
* "pak TOC order is stage order" / "TOC order is semantic order" → it is not.
* "the executable holds the asset names" → the image names **no data value at
all**; that route is powerless.
* "the image might name a data VALUE" → powerless.
* "the XPR2 manifest names hash to the DefTables tables" → refuted.
* "the `DefTables` model names are unreachable" → reachable via the `Enumerate`
declaration tables (1 413/1 425, 99.2 %).
* "the `GP_MAIN_GAME_*` unnamed block is undiscovered data" → refuted.
* "each `GP_MAIN_GAME_*` `Enumerate` object declares something" → refuted.
* "`GP_HANGAR_ARSENAL` is missing data tables" → refuted.
* "the `Enumeration` self-index can name objects" → a self-index names
**records, not files**.
* "a per-pak prefix might close the 2D blocker" → no.
* "the `+` paths might name the 2D or `GP_READY_ROOM` keys" → the `+`-dictionary
route is exhausted, 0 of 1 817.
* "the `game:\` paths are unresolved" → refuted.
* "a set-difference over file names can see reuse" → it cannot; **join per
USER**. Per-pak copies are ×6.
## Units, weapons, effects and assets
* "`Generic` (394) is the unit datasheet" → refuted.
* "a loadout's `Arm1` names an item" → it names a **hardpoint slot**
(`Turret_NNN`), 59/59.
* "`EnumUnit` and the unit datasheet share a vocabulary" → they do not.
* "the roster is the `Generic.Model` set" → roster 40, `Generic.Model` 46,
`GameResourceID` 480 — three vocabularies.
* "every unit ID is `UN_<l>###_<FACTION>_<name>`" → the grammar is
`UN_<letter>###_[<subkind>_]<FACTION>_<name>`.
* "`_EXn` is the `Extra0n` index" → three different `EX` vocabularies exist.
* "the only two `_EX5` names on the disc are the AA gun and the DeltaSaber" →
refuted.
* "running the tutorial will instantiate the `_Ttrl` weapons" → refuted.
* "the disc has exactly three `EnumWeapon` tables" → four.
* "the `wep_NN` package gaps are unshipped weapons" / "`wep_85` is the tip of a
family" → `wep_85` is the **only** declared-but-unshipped asset (59/0/1/26).
* "nothing is deployed without being declared" → refuted.
* "effects are one namespace" → refuted.
* "the 58 undeclared effect names are missing assets" → refuted.
* "all five orphan effects are unshipped" → refuted.
* "`eff_f0002` ships in `Base.xpr`" → refuted.
* "`Base.xpr` holds more bound effects than `ptc_pack`" → refuted.
* "the 34 unlocated are a scatter" → refuted.
* "the 9 unlocated might be under another prefix" → refuted.
* "`ptc_pack` has 532 names" → 727.
* "the `_e`/`_f` law is effect-FIELD-specific" → it is the **faction law**,
564/564.
* "a disc-wide `.xpr` byte search can show an effect is ABSENT" → it cannot.
* "`rot_n001` is on the disc" → refuted.
* "`rou_f004`'s mesh is in `Stage_S28.xpr`" → it is in `DeltaSaber_A.xpr`.
* "`parent` + `_all` + `_child` is the composite-model convention" → refuted.
`_hangar` **is** real (59 of 166, 59/59 with a bare twin); `_all`/`_child` is
not.
* "`Motion_guard_start` has no damage variants" → refuted.
* "`CoverArea` bits 2 and 3 are mutually exclusive" → refuted.
* "the 27 unresolved `NamePlate` values are missing objects" → refuted.
## LOD, background and misc tables
* "`EnumLODSet_*` is a per-stage family" → `EnumLODSet_test.tbl` serves 17
stages; 17+5+1 = 23.
* "there are 8 orphan LOD tables" → 6.
* "the orphans are stale copies of `_test`" → refuted.
* "S25 is absent from the `DefTables` LOD families" → refuted.
* "`BackGroundID` has no referent anywhere" → it is an **identity**.
* "`BackGroundPackage == BG_<id>.xpr`" → refuted.
* "`<X>ID` + `<X>Package` is a convention" → refuted.
* "`Placement_*` / `RouteTest_*` are unattached" → refuted.
* "the `AsteroidDefinition` join does not reproduce by hash" → it does.
* "the 8-value frame is a new finding" → it was already in the corpus.
## Loaders, config and tuning
* "the config reader is XML" → INI.
* "`sub_822F9498` is the unit-definition loader" → it is `PlayerParams`'s.
* "`sub_822AE628` reads the main-game `Tweak`" → refuted.
* "`sub_8230D1F8` is a rank table" → it is the stage-settings loader.
* "`sub_82286BC8`'s key list is new" → refuted.
* "`sub_825F2CF0` / `sub_825F2F88` read a post-processing table" → refuted.
* "`Booster` is a new schema" / "`Booster` is the player craft's flight
envelope" → refuted; nothing selects `Booster`.
* "the `AnalogRevice`/`Tweak` block is unreachable" → reachable
(`sub_821A6CF0`, base `0x820A1630`).
* "a 0-xref string block has no reader" → refuted.
* "the AI table was NEEDS-HUMAN" → refuted.
* "the `PG*` HUD names are undocumented" → they are documented.
* "a base-solver row identifies a FUNCTION" → it does not.
* "a 64K-boundary base is low confidence" → **inverted**; it is high
confidence.
* "the 0x820B0000 cluster is a false positive" → refuted.
* "a pointer to a function in the image implies a registry" → refuted.
`.pdata` is not a registry.
* "the 13 player-facing chatter tables are the WINGMAN tables" → refuted.
* "the 8 undeclared chatter tables are tutorial chatter" → refuted.
* "other datasheets ship a schema too" → refuted.
## Encoding and text
* "every IDXD string value is ASCII" → 6 non-ASCII values of 99 328.
* "`文字列` is a dev placeholder" → they are Shift-JIS **type words**.