9652a5ad77
WORKFLOW-gitea.md said what the working surface is and why. It did not say how, in what order, or how to know a step worked -- so it was a destination with no route. This is the route. Seven phases, each with a check, each marked 👤 human or 🤖 me: 1 identities two agent users, Write NOT Admin 2 protection main behind a PR + 1 approval -- BEFORE tokens exist 3 tokens three principals, three tokens, three files 4 structure labels and bundles, and deliberately NO Kanban board 5 MCP gitea-mcp v1.7.0, per-agent identity, user scope not .mcp.json 6 items migrate the live findings only -- not 1,227 historical lines 7 restart and verify the three things that must be true Phase 1 leads because it is not hygiene: Gitea does not let a PR's author approve it, so while an agent IS `fabi` either the human cannot approve its work or it can approve its own. The review gate does not exist until the agents are distinct people. (It also fixes 495 commits of agent work attributed to the human's email.) Phase 2's check is a real push and a real PR, not a reading of the settings page. The reason protection lives in the server rather than in a brief is that it should not depend on good behaviour -- so verifying it should not either. Phase 5's install facts are checked, not remembered: gitea-mcp v1.7.0, `gitea-mcp_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz`, `-t stdio -H <host>`, `GITEA_ACCESS_TOKEN`. The `--tools` filter is flagged as an EXPERIMENT that might exclude the merge tool as defence in depth -- explicitly not a substitute for phase 2. Ends with what is still to build (propose-work, an attachment uploader, gitea-verify, the wiki landing page) and a "what I have not verified" section: the approve-your-own-PR behaviour, the --tools names, the Projects API, and the Gitea version -- the API was unreachable from my sandbox three times running.
Sylpheed
A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).
Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:
| The decoders | crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide |
| The port | port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads |
| The corpus | docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends |
You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.
The oracle is the real game
sylpheed-cliand the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.
This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.
Layout
crates/
sylpheed-formats/ the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
sylpheed-cli/ headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
sylpheed-viewer/ the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
sylpheed-export/ disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/ the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/ decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
base/ generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
mods/ drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
re/ the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
game/ how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
port/ the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
-- and RUNNING.md, which is how you actually start it
agents/ how the agent team works together
tools/ capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/ transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/ the agent containers
Where to start
docs/re/INDEX.md— what is decodeddocs/re/REFUTED.md— what has been tested and dieddocs/re/METHOD.md— traps this project has already paid fordocs/game/navigation.md— how the game is navigateddocs/port/MODDING.md— why the asset tree looks the way it does
Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.
Conventions
Confidence is per claim, never per document: ✅ CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE ·
❔ HYPOTHESIS · ❌ REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning
rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.