cf91ad1dcc
decides 55% of verdicts The port implemented the forced-backdrop rule and reported a discrepancy: palogo_eff0.prm at 256 opaque instants against this corpus's 211. There is no discrepancy. palogo_eff0.prm appears on BOTH splashes -- the publisher (entries 10, 13) runs to t=255, giving 256 instants; the developer (11, 14) runs to t=210, giving 211. Same definition, different bundle. The page now names the entries so it cannot recur. The definition, stated: the span is 0..=max keyframe time over every element in the build, and an element HOLDS its final pose past its own last keyframe -- which is what pose_at does, and which is decoded rather than assumed (a group holds at its last keyframe rather than looping; the declared +0x08 never falls short of the last keyframe, the slack being that hold). The port's instinct that the hold was load-bearing was right. Over the 130 keyless full-screen primitives with an opaque interval: * span = the header's declared +0x08 -> 0 verdicts change * span = the primitive's own last keyframe -> 72 change * elements GONE after their last keyframe -> 72 change So the hold decides 55% of verdicts -- and dropping it is REFUTED by a measured order. palogo_eff0.prm is a single keyframe at t=0: without the hold it is opaque for one instant, no other element is up yet, and the rule calls it free, against a game measured painting it first. Pinned by a new test that spells out the counterfactual rather than importing it. The verdicts that matter are convention-independent: pgloading_eff00.prm is FIRST under all four conventions and pteff00.prm FREE under all four. And the header length is interchangeable with the elements' maximum -- zero disagreements disc-wide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QsEPXWVaEpyfudtR6re1Pd
Sylpheed
A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).
Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:
| The decoders | crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide |
| The port | port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads |
| The corpus | docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends |
You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.
The oracle is the real game
sylpheed-cliand the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.
This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.
Layout
crates/
sylpheed-formats/ the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
sylpheed-cli/ headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
sylpheed-viewer/ the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
sylpheed-export/ disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/ the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/ decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
base/ generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
mods/ drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
re/ the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
game/ how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
port/ the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
agents/ how the agent team works together
tools/ capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/ transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/ the agent containers
Where to start
docs/re/INDEX.md— what is decodeddocs/re/REFUTED.md— what has been tested and dieddocs/re/METHOD.md— traps this project has already paid fordocs/game/navigation.md— how the game is navigateddocs/port/MODDING.md— why the asset tree looks the way it does
Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.
Conventions
Confidence is per claim, never per document: ✅ CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE ·
❔ HYPOTHESIS · ❌ REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning
rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.