d8807c4f8f
`ascii_runs` in movie_manifest.rs had a nested `else { if .. }`. Clippy's
`collapsible_else_if` flags it — on some toolchains.
WHY IT WAS NEVER CAUGHT, AND WHY THAT IS THE INTERESTING PART:
clippy::collapsible-else-if @1.92.0 (2025-12-08) -> warn
clippy::collapsible-else-if @1.98.1 (2026-09-01) -> allow
CI installs `dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable`, which floats. The runner is on
1.98.1, where this lint is allow-by-default, so the Clippy job passed. A local
run on a nine-month-old stable failed on the same bytes. Neither instrument was
broken; "clippy clean" is simply a statement about a toolchain and a date, and
nothing in the pipeline records which. That is #15, and this commit does not fix
it -- it removes one instance of its consequence.
Fixing it rather than pinning, because `else { if }` is worse code on every
version. A tree whose cleanliness is contingent on a release date is the thing
to avoid; agreeing with both toolchains is cheaper than arguing about which one
is right.
⚠️ I FIRST DIAGNOSED THIS WRONG, and the wrong version is worth recording. From
CI's rustfmt reporting 774 hunks and mine reporting 774, I concluded the
toolchains matched, therefore the clippys matched, therefore CI's green must be
a cached or ungated result -- "the frozen splash again". Every step after the
first was false. rustfmt is deliberately output-stable within a style edition;
clippy explicitly moves lints between groups. Measured here afterwards:
rustfmt 1.8.0-stable -> 774 hunks
rustfmt 1.9.0-stable -> 774 hunks (nine months apart, identical)
So formatting parity carries no information about which clippy ran. It is the
same error as reading protection off a settings page or reachability off a DNS
record: a property inferred from something ADJACENT to it. The peer refuted it
by measurement -- `No cache found` in the run log, and `success()` evaluating
'true' in 207 against 'false' in 203 -- rather than by accepting the framing.
Verified on both: 1.92.0 `clippy --workspace -- -D warnings` rc=0 (was 101);
1.98.1 with the lint forced on, 0 sites. rustfmt still 774, so no debt added to
#12. Tests 207 passed / 0 failed / 14 ignored, unchanged.
Sylpheed
A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).
Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:
| The decoders | crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide |
| The port | port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads |
| The corpus | docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends |
You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.
The oracle is the real game
sylpheed-cliand the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.
This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.
Layout
crates/
sylpheed-formats/ the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
sylpheed-cli/ headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
sylpheed-viewer/ the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
sylpheed-export/ disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/ the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/ decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
base/ generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
mods/ drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
re/ the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
game/ how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
port/ the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
-- and RUNNING.md, which is how you actually start it
agents/ how the agent team works together
tools/ capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/ transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/ the agent containers
Where to start
docs/re/INDEX.md— what is decodeddocs/re/REFUTED.md— what has been tested and dieddocs/re/METHOD.md— traps this project has already paid fordocs/game/navigation.md— how the game is navigateddocs/port/MODDING.md— why the asset tree looks the way it does
Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.
Conventions
Confidence is per claim, never per document: ✅ CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE ·
❔ HYPOTHESIS · ❌ REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning
rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.