Continuing the F1 investigation rather than starting a fresh one. Last iteration left two competing hypotheses open (Keystroke-queue-driven vs polled-state-driven repeat) and flagged C_PAD_RINGBUF's producer as the cheapest thing to trace next -- named but not traced. Traced it this time: C_PAD_DECODER's own constructor (sub_8220B610) allocates C_PAD_RINGBUF (52-byte control struct, 1024-byte backing buffer, confirmed against its own Shift-JIS trace strings -- "C_PAD_RINGBUF initialization" and its allocation-error message). Its update function (sub_8220B8C0) takes the input-manager singleton as a parameter and reads the ring at offsets 12, 36, 40, 44 and 48 -- not just the one button word. Offsets 36-48 are four consecutive fields read together through the same int-to-double conversion an analog axis would use. XamInputGetKeystrokeEx has no field for a stick position, so a structure carrying four axis-shaped fields cannot be a keystroke queue -- it reads as a periodically-refreshed polled-state snapshot. My own prior reading of the "ring buffer" name as implying a queue was the wrong inference; refuted by tracing it, recorded either way per adversarial duty. This shifts the balance toward the second, previously-uncertain hypothesis: the file driver's GetState() was always capable of showing real repeat (no modification needed), and nav_repeat_and_b.py's null result is more likely a sampling artifact of its ~4-5 fps screen-diff detector than a structural driver limit. Revises "what would close it" accordingly -- re-run the existing draw-log position-tracking instrument, gated on the menu properly, before reaching for a driver change. Not found: the actual producer that writes into C_PAD_RINGBUF each frame -- narrowed to "reachable from the input-manager singleton fetch in sub_821A9DC8," not traced to completion. Still no number for issue #1; this narrows the path to one, further than last iteration but not there.
Sylpheed
A clean-room reverse engineering and port project for Project Sylpheed: Arc of Deception (Xbox 360, 2007).
Three things live here, in one repository so that a change spanning them lands as one commit:
| The decoders | crates/sylpheed-formats — the disc's formats, read and verified disc-wide |
| The port | port/ — a Godot 4 project, plus crates/sylpheed-export which converts a disc into the open asset tree it reads |
| The corpus | docs/re/ — what has been reverse engineered, with its evidence, its retractions and its dead ends |
You need your own copy of the game. No game content is in this repository and none ever will be. The exporter reads the disc you supply.
The oracle is the real game
sylpheed-cliand the Explorer are tools for verifying our decoding. They are hypotheses under test and they have been wrong. When something must be checked against the truth, the truth is the game running in Xenia Canary, captured — not any renderer of ours.
This is stated first because getting it backwards is the most expensive mistake this project has made.
Layout
crates/
sylpheed-formats/ the decoders. Disc-wide verified; the corpus is its spec
sylpheed-cli/ headless tools -- render a screen, dump a table, probe audio
sylpheed-viewer/ the Explorer: a human's window onto the disc. STATIC data only
sylpheed-export/ disc -> the open, moddable asset tree
port/ the Godot 4 project. Reads open formats ONLY
authored/ decisions that are NOT on the disc, each with its reason
data/
base/ generated by the exporter. Gitignored, never hand-edited
mods/ drop-in overrides. Yours
docs/
re/ the corpus: findings, refutations, method traps
game/ how the game is navigated -- menus, modals, flight
port/ the port's mission, its handoff contract, modding rules
-- and RUNNING.md, which is how you actually start it
agents/ how the agent team works together
tools/ capture harnesses, probes, the share tool
exchange/ transient inter-agent files. NOT in git
docker/ the agent containers
Where to start
docs/re/INDEX.md— what is decodeddocs/re/REFUTED.md— what has been tested and dieddocs/re/METHOD.md— traps this project has already paid fordocs/game/navigation.md— how the game is navigateddocs/port/MODDING.md— why the asset tree looks the way it does
Xenia Canary is a separate repository: it is a fork tracking upstream, and it carries our instrumentation.
Conventions
Confidence is per claim, never per document: ✅ CONFIRMED · 🟡 PROBABLE ·
❔ HYPOTHESIS · ❌ REFUTED. A withdrawn result is kept with its reasoning
rather than deleted — that is why the numbers here can be trusted.