Files
Sylpheed/tools/ppc-manual/alu/addx.md
sim 84856fc081
All checks were successful
CI / Native — linux (pull_request) Successful in 2h1m57s
CI / WASM — Web (pull_request) Successful in 28m8s
CI / Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 1m26s
docs(ppc-manual): check every xenia-rs claim against Canary's source
The hand-written parts of the manual still described how the retired
xenia-rs interpreter behaved: its snapshots, Rust casts and helpers. Each of
those 490 statements is now either restated as what Canary's emitters and
x64 backend actually do (at the pinned canary_experimental commit), or
dropped where it only made sense for xenia-rs.

Checking them turned up claims that were wrong, not just outdated:

- VSCR[SAT] is never modelled in Canary (DID_SATURATE is a stub and mfvscr
  cannot see it); the pages said saturating ops set it stickily.
- Canary does not implement lswi/lswx/stswi/stswx, dcbi, mtfsb0/mtfsb1,
  vmsum*, vmhaddshs, vupkhpx/vupklpx, and most SPRs; pages described them
  as working.
- Traps evaluate TO in Canary; stvebx/stvehx/stvewx store one element, not
  16 bytes; mtmsrd writes only EE; fres/frsqrte/vrsqrtefp precision claims
  and the stfs "rounds under RN / sets FPSCR" claim contradicted the spec.
- Reservations are a 64 KiB block bitmap plus a value compare, not
  per-address tracking.

Claims that neither Canary's source nor a public spec settles are marked
unverified (NI at boot, vmaddcfp128 operand order, estimate bit-exactness).

Generated regions are untouched; re-running the generator changes nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 21:52:38 +02:00

6.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

addx — Add

Category: Integer ALU · Form: XO · Opcode: 0x7c000214

Assembler Mnemonics

Mnemonic XML entry Flags Description
add addx Add
addo addx OE=1 Add
add. addx Rc=1 Add
addo. addx OE=1, Rc=1 Add

Syntax

add[OE][Rc] [RD], [RA], [RB]

Encoding

addx — form XO

  • Opcode word: 0x7c000214
  • Primary opcode (bits 05): 31
  • Extended opcode: 266
  • Synchronising: no
Bits Field Meaning
05 OPCD primary opcode (31)
610 RT destination GPR
1115 RA source A
1620 RB source B
21 OE overflow-enable flag
2230 XO extended opcode (9 bits)
31 Rc record-form flag

Operands

Field Role Description
RA addx: read Source GPR (r0r31).
RB addx: read Source GPR.
RD addx: write Destination GPR.
OE addx: write (conditional) Overflow-enable bit. When 1, the instruction updates XER[OV] and stickies XER[SO] on signed overflow.
CR addx: write (conditional) Condition-register update. When Rc=1, CR field 0 (or CR6 for vector compares, CR1 for FPU) is updated from the result.

Register Effects

addx

  • Reads (always): RA, RB
  • Reads (conditional): none
  • Writes (always): RD
  • Writes (conditional): OE, CR

Status-Register Effects

  • addx: CR0 ← signed-compare(result, 0) with SO ← XER[SO], when Rc=1.; XER[OV] ← signed-overflow(result); XER[SO] stickies, when OE=1.

Operation (pseudocode)

RT <- (RA) + (RB)

C Translation Example

/* add / add. / addo / addo.  (XO-form)                         */
uint64_t a = r[insn.RA], b = r[insn.RB];
uint64_t result = a + b;
r[insn.RT] = result;
if (insn.OE) { bool ov = (~(a ^ b) & (a ^ result)) >> 63;
               if (ov) { xer.OV = 1; xer.SO = 1; } else xer.OV = 0; }
if (insn.Rc) update_cr0_signed((int64_t)result);

Implementation References

addx

Canary emitter (frozen snapshot @ f21ebd49e9)
int InstrEmit_addx(PPCHIRBuilder& f, const InstrData& i) {
  // RD <- (RA) + (RB)
  Value* v = f.Add(f.LoadGPR(i.XO.RA), f.LoadGPR(i.XO.RB));
  f.StoreGPR(i.XO.RT, v);
  if (i.XO.OE) {
    XEINSTRNOTIMPLEMENTED();
    // e.update_xer_with_overflow(EFLAGS OF?);
  }
  if (i.XO.Rc) {
    f.UpdateCR(0, v);
  }
  return 0;
}

Extended Pseudocode

RT <- (RA) + (RB)                                ; modulo 2^64, carry discarded
if OE then
    XER[OV] <- (~(RA ^ RB) & (RA ^ RT))[0]       ; signed overflow: same-sign inputs, opposite-sign result
    XER[SO] <- XER[SO] | XER[OV]
if Rc then
    CR0[LT,GT,EQ] <- signed_compare(RT, 0)        ; 64-bit comparison on the Xenon
    CR0[SO]      <- XER[SO]

Special Cases & Edge Conditions

  • No trap on overflow. addo / addo. record overflow in XER[OV] and sticky-set XER[SO]. A trap can only be produced by a separate td/tw instruction examining the result.
  • Signed-overflow predicate. Overflow occurs iff both addends share a sign bit and the result has the opposite sign bit: OV = ((~(a ^ b)) & (a ^ rt)) >> 63. Unsigned carry is not tracked — use addcx when you need XER[CA].
  • XER[SO] is sticky. Once set, it remains set until cleared by mcrxr. The . record forms copy it into CR0[SO].
  • 64-bit CR update on Xenon. The Xbox 360 Xenon CPU is 64-bit, so add. compares the full 64-bit result against zero. Canary truncates to 32 bits before the CR update (f.UpdateCR(0, v) compares Truncate(v, INT32) with zero). If your translator must match Canary bit-for-bit, emit a 32-bit compare; if it must be spec-correct, emit a 64-bit compare. Most Xbox 360 object code works either way because results that overflow 32 bits are rare outside of explicit 64-bit math.
  • OE overflow detection is not implemented in Canary. The addo / addo. branch is XEINSTRNOTIMPLEMENTED(). A faithful translator should still emit the overflow check — titles rarely observe XER[OV], but it's occasionally used by profiling / sanity-checking code paths.
  • Operand aliasing. add r3, r3, r3, add r3, r3, r4, add r3, r4, r3 are all legal. The addition reads both source operands before writing RT.
  • No immediate form. For RT = RA + imm use addi / addis. Those are distinct opcodes, not a flag on add.
  • addcx — produces the carry-out in XER[CA].
  • addex — sums (RA) + (RB) + XER[CA] (carry-in chain).
  • addmex, addzex — add to 1 or 0 with carry-in (used to propagate borrows across multiword subtracts).
  • addi, addis — D-form immediate adds; no Rc/OE.
  • addic, addicx — D-form adds that set XER[CA].
  • subfx — the dual: RT ← (RB) (RA).
  • negx — two's-complement negate.

IBM Reference