Sylpheed/docs/re/screen-transitions.md

# What happens between two screens — a fade through black, and where its timing lives

**Status:** ✅ `CONFIRMED`. The quad and its ramp are **decoded** (a keyframe
group on the disc, with a disc-wide check); the wall-clock timings are
**measured** off the running game at 30 fps. One piece is **undecodable from this
field** and is called out below.

Answers [MISSION Q7](../port/MISSION.md).

## The mechanism — decoded

Every title-side screen carries a full-screen untextured primitive that is
**black, and paints last**: `pteff00.prm` in `GP_TITLE`, `pfeff00.prm` in
`GP_SAVE_LOAD`. That it sorts last was already established
([`structures/ui-paint-order-key.md`](structures/ui-paint-order-key.md)); what is
new here is that its **keyframe group is the transition**.

The group is always four blocks, and always this shape:

| block | alpha | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | `0xff` at `t = T0` | the screen starts **black** |
| 2 | `0x00` at `t = T1` | ramp to fully clear — the screen **fades in** |
| 3 | `0x00` at `t = T2` | clear; this is the resting pose, the quad is invisible |
| 4 | `0xff`, **no time** | ramp back to black — the screen **fades out** on exit |

Read with the corpus's rule that a keyframe is the *start* of a ramp
([`structures/ui-resting-pose.md`](structures/ui-resting-pose.md)).

```
$ tools/re-capture/fade_quads.py 4 5 6          # GP_TITLE
build 4 (title)      pteff00.prm   t=16 α=255   t=261 α=0   t=269 α=0   t=— α=255
build 5 (main menu)  pteff00.prm   t=12 α=255   t= 70 α=0   t= 80 α=0   t=— α=255
build 6 (EXTRAS)     pteff00.prm   t=12 α=255   t= 64 α=0   t= 74 α=0   t=— α=255
```

Under [Q1](ui-keyframe-time-unit.md)'s `1 unit = 1/60 s`: the screen holds black
for **0.20 s**, then fades in over **0.87 s** (`EXTRAS`), **0.97 s** (main menu)
or **4.08 s** (the title).

### ❔ The fade-OUT duration is not in this field

The fourth block has **no time** — a group's last block stops 4 bytes short and
that word is already the next group's element index
([`ui_layout.rs`](../../crates/sylpheed-formats/src/ui_layout.rs) documents the
packing). So the disc gives the ramp's *target* (black) and not its length. That
duration is **measured** below, and the port is authoring it.

### The disc-wide check, and what it shows about overlays

Over every `GP_*.pak`, counting bundles that have a `.prm` element **and** ≥8
elements (screen-sized rather than a two-element fragment):

> **40 of 97** carry a 255 → 0 → 255 quad; 56 of the 60 found disc-wide have
> exactly 4 keyframes.

41 % sounds weak until it is read per pak, where it is nearly all-or-nothing:

| pak | with quad / screen-sized |
|---|---|
| `GP_MISSION_SELECT`, `GP_MOVIE_THEATER`, `GP_OPTIONS`, `GP_TUTORIAL`, `GP_SYSTEM` | 2/2 each |
| `GP_BUNK`, `GP_CHALLENGE` | 6/6 |
| `GP_STAGE_CLEAR` | 4/4 |
| `GP_SAVE_LOAD` | 10/12 |
| **`GP_TITLE`** | **6/12** |
| `GP_DIALOG` | 0/133 |
| `GP_DEBRIEFING_PILOTLOG` | 4/102 |

**`GP_TITLE`'s 6 of 12 is the interesting row, and it is not a gap.** The six
that carry the quad are exactly the six *screen* builds — title, main menu and
`EXTRAS`, English and Japanese. The six that do not are exactly the six
**overlays**: the `PRESS Ⓐ BUTTON` plate and the two `DELTASABER` plates
([`ui-title-build-map.md`](ui-title-build-map.md)). An overlay composited onto a
screen has no transition of its own, so it has no fade quad — which is
independent corroboration that those builds are overlays rather than screens.
`GP_DIALOG`'s 0/133 says the same thing about dialog boxes.

## The timing — measured

Recorded with `ffmpeg -f x11grab -framerate 30` over the game surface, mean
frame luminance per frame; raw data in
[`captures/transitions/transition-luminance.csv`](captures/transitions/transition-luminance.csv),
filmstrip in
[`transition-filmstrip.png`](captures/transitions/transition-filmstrip.png).

| | main menu → `EXTRAS` (Ⓐ) | `EXTRAS` → main menu (Ⓑ) |
|---|---|---|
| press → first visible change | 0.07 s | 0.37 s |
| **fade-out to black** | **0.367 s** | **0.400 s** |
| **pure black** (luminance 0.02) | 0.233 s | 0.167 s |
| luminance rise until settled | 0.567 s | 1.467 s |

The fade-out is the number the file cannot give, and it comes out the same both
ways: **~0.4 s**, i.e. ~24 units under Q1's rule.

The black hold is *consistent with* the file's 12 units (0.20 s) but does not
confirm it — the plateau spans the tail of the outgoing screen's fade-out and the
head of the incoming screen's black, and this measurement cannot separate them.

### ⚠️ The luminance rise is **not** the quad's ramp

The two columns differ by 2.6× where the quad's declared ramps differ by only
1.12× (58 units vs 52). The filmstrip says why: the background reappears *first*
and the labels arrive after it, so what the luminance curve is timing is the
incoming screen's **own element animations**, not the fade quad. Quoting 1.47 s
as "the main menu's fade" would be wrong. The quad's ramp is decoded; the
screen's build-in is a separate, longer thing.

## For the port

* a screen change is: **fade the outgoing screen to black over ~0.4 s**, hold
  black briefly, then **fade the incoming screen in over its own declared ramp**
  while its elements play their own keyframes;
* the fade-in ramp is **read from the file** (`T1 − T0` on the screen's fade
  quad);
* the ~0.4 s fade-out and the black hold are **authored from this page** — the
  disc does not carry them.

## ✅ Which quantity the ~0.4 s is — measured 2026-08-29

Asked by the port: is 0.4 s **(a)** the ramp from the hold to the exit pose, i.e.
exactly the missing duration of that untimed keyframe, **(b)** several keyframes'
worth, or **(c)** something the game does independently of the group?

**It is (a)** — and it is bigger than the fade quad. Two facts.

🔴 **1. "There is exactly one untimed keyframe, and every element has it" — REFUTED
2026-08-30. It was a STALE BINARY.**

That claim came from `screen info`, and the copy of `sylpheed-cli` in this container
was built **2026-08-29 12:38**, before the keyframe-record-layout fix landed. The old
parser shifted every time by one slot and could not time a group's final pose, so it
printed a trailing `-`. Rebuilt, the same element reads:

```
stale  pteff00.prm  4 kf  rest t=70   [12:0,0  70:0,0  80:0,0  -:0,0]
fresh  pteff00.prm  4 kf  rest t=12   [ 0:0,0  12:0,0  70:0,0  80:0,0]
```

**Four timed poses. There is no untimed keyframe and no unknown duration**, so the
question this section was answering — *"is 0.4 s the missing duration of that
untimed keyframe"* — no longer has its subject. The argument below (the ratio test)
is untouched and still shows the content fading rather than a quad arriving; what is
dead is the framing around it.

✅ **And the number is now decoded.** `pteff00.prm`'s final ramp is **70 → 80 = 10
units ≈ 0.167 s**, not the ~24 units this page authored. That confirms the port
agent's reading; I tried to refute it against the bytes and could not.

🔴 **So the measured ~0.4 s is NOT the ramp alone** — 0.4 s is ~24 units against a
decoded 10. Something else occupies the other ~14 units. 🟡 That the remainder is
exactly the black hold is *arithmetic that fits* (14 units = 0.233 s, inside this
corpus's own 0.17–0.23 s plateau), **not a measurement** — and a fit that closes a
question without evidence is what this pair of agents has been catching all week.
The decomposition stays open.

| elements | final untimed block | what it does |
|---|---|---|
| `pteff00.prm` (the fade quad) | `a = 255` | goes **black** |
| `pteff10`, `pteff12`, `ptbtn01…05`, `ptmsg` | `a = 0` | **fade out** |
| `ptframe1`, `ptframe2` | `a = 255` | hold, and get covered |
| `ptbase`, `pteff05`, `ptloop*`, `pteff02.prm` | single keyframe | hold |

**2. The capture shows the content fading, not just a black quad arriving.** This
has a null hypothesis that discriminates: under (c) — the game blackens the frame
independently — every region is scaled by the same `1 − α`, so the **ratio**
between a button region and a background region is *constant* through the
fade-out. Under (a) it must fall, because the buttons ramp to `a = 0` while the
background elements hold at 255 and are only dimmed.

Measured on [`transition-filmstrip.png`](captures/transitions/transition-filmstrip.png),
button column ÷ upper-right background art, frame by frame through the fade-out:

```
frame     0      1      2      3      4      5
ratio  6.495  5.574  3.105  2.125  1.935   (black)
```

**A 3.4× monotonic fall.** Constant is refuted. The buttons really are fading
independently of the overall dim, exactly as their declared final block says.
(The incoming screen runs it in reverse, 2.22 → 3.47 over frames 7–12.)

⚠️ **Reach.** The filmstrip is downsampled and the "button" region unavoidably
contains some background, so the ratio is a direction, not a clean alpha
measurement. It refutes the constant-ratio null decisively; it does not by itself
pin the 0.4 s to ±0.05 s. And it is measured on **one** transition pair.

### For the port

Write **one** authored constant — the duration of the final untimed keyframe,
~0.4 s / ~24 units — and **play the group to its end on every element**. Do not
model the exit as a black rectangle fading over a frozen screen: the buttons and
labels ramp to transparent at the same time, and that difference is visible.