fill_quad composites an untextured primitive as a solid rectangle of the
keyframes fade colour, pivot x 2 in size, placed and scaled exactly as a sprite
is. Behind ComposeOptions::include_primitives and screen render --primitives.
On the title screen, whose paint order is ground truth, it is measurably right:
mean luminance 76.30 -> 63.72 against the captures 64.58, i.e. from +18% to
-1.3%, and mean absolute difference 16.07 -> 13.08. The background was ~40% too
bright; pteff02.prm, a 25% black dim, was what was missing. The wordmark is not
dimmed by it because the measured order paints that quad at slot 4, beneath the
logo. Edge correlation moves 0.9538 -> 0.9480, which is not informative here: a
uniform dim scales gradients uniformly so a normalised edge score barely sees it.
OFF BY DEFAULT, and that is the finding. A primitive has no T8aD header, so no
layer key, and derived_paint_order sorts the keyless to the end. GP_DIALOGs
pzeff00.prm is a single keyframe of opaque black at full screen; painted last it
wipes the build. Of the 125 builds that draw a visible primitive, 36 come out
>99% one colour with the derived order.
No constant default works, because the two screens read off the running game
disagree: the splash paints its primitive FIRST (the black backdrop) while the
title paints one at slot 4 and another LAST (the fade-out). Declaration order
fails the title too. A disc test measures the damage rather than asserting the
feature works, so the number moves when the ordering is solved.
Also records a false alarm worth keeping: a first pass reported 36 GP_DIALOG
builds at "100% black", which was a crude near-black pixel threshold and not a
black screen - those dialogs are dimmed 50% and perfectly legible. The genuinely
wiped builds are a different set.
Element::rest() picked the keyframe with the largest gap to the next keyframe's
time. That reads a keyframe as a value held until the next one; it is the start
of a ramp toward it. A long gap after keyframe k means the screen spends that
time arriving at k+1, so the settled pose is at the far end of the gap.
The title wordmark zooms in over five frames and holds at (184,193) at 100% from
t=251 to t=264. The old rule picked the frame before the long gap: (179,186) at
101%, still mid-zoom.
Measured against the framebuffer capture of the running title screen, which is a
1:1 crop so frame coordinates map directly (confirmed: the copyright line lands
on row 669 in the capture and in both composites). Edge-correlated over the
wordmark box:
plateau (landed) best 0.4597 at shift (0,0)
longest dwell (old) best 0.1511 at shift (+3,+8), 0.1268 at (0,0)
The old composite scores 3x lower and only peaks after being moved, by about the
(-5,-7) that picking kf4 instead of kf5 predicts.
It also fixes six title elements the old rule rested at alpha 0x00 where the
capture plainly shows them, and pteff00.prm - the full-screen fade quad painted
last - which rested at opaque black. That was the blocker on .prm compositing.
Adds tools/re-capture/align_to_capture.py, which is how this was scored, and
turns the .prm test that deliberately asserted the old defect into a guard on
the fix.
Not settled and now the next item: compose ignores the keyframe fade alpha
entirely (blit modulates by tint only), which is why choosing the wrong keyframe
was invisible until now.
369 .prm elements exist in the disc's screen builds and every composite is
missing them. Swept statically:
* none of the 369 has a RATC child of its own name — no payload, nothing to
draw, so .prm is a primitive and not a sprite;
* kind & 0x10 and a .prm name agree with ZERO exceptions in either direction
over all 965 builds, so the format marks primitives as a decoded field and a
port need not parse filenames;
* 361 of 369 are exactly 1280x720 at scale 100% in the corner, and their
keyframe 'fade' ARGB is overwhelmingly black at some alpha — these are the
fade-to-black, dim-behind-menu and flash layers, i.e. the PRMD dim-quad the
compositor's backdrop has been standing in for.
Refuted before believing: drawing them at Element::rest() is wrong. The title's
pteff00.prm is opaque -> transparent -> transparent -> opaque, a transition whose
resting pose is the transparent plateau; rest() picks by longest dwell and lands
on the opaque endpoint, which is painted LAST on that screen and would black out
the title. A test asserts that wrong answer deliberately so that fixing the
resting rule fails it and leads to the note.
No compositing change: the resting rule is not .prm-specific and has to be A/B'd
against the title framebuffer capture first.
