Verified rather than adopted: a subagent proposed that every even operand
slot is a type tag. Measured, the strong form is false and a precise form is
true.
TRUE: a SYMBOL operand is two words, a tag holding the constant 1 followed
by the index. Slot 0 is the integer 1 in 19899/19899 calls whose slot 4 is a
unit; slot 8 is tag-shaped in 100% of calls for every built-in taking a
second unit; slot 16 is 1 in 152/152 for built-in 128, the only one taking a
third. The 24 built-ins whose slot 0 is NOT the constant are exactly those
taking no symbol there. This explains the unit slots 4/12/20 rather than
replacing them.
FALSE as stated: slot 8 is a bare double for built-ins 4, 20, 24, 26, 28,
29, 90, 106 and 127, and built-in 75 carries five bare indices at 0/4/8/12/16
with no tags at all. Each built-in has a fixed signature and is 100%
self-consistent; none of the 34 with >=20 sites mixes the two.
Symbol table 1 has three types -- 1 routes (1362), 6 messages (2247), 7
effects (81) -- and its operand slots are type-pure, measured the same way.
Resolving them makes listings say what the script means:
`request_script_message(MSG_VOICE_D_257, ...)`, a fourth independent
confirmation of that name. Slots 24@4, 46@12 and 114@4 resolve 100% but MIX
types 6 and 1, so they are left unresolved rather than guessed.
Two more names withdrawn, neither replaced:
* 88 `camera_at` -- ZERO call sites in all 28 stages; never testable.
* 90 `camera_at_route` -- 8 sites, all Stage 02 phase 3, first operand is
symtab-1 type 7 `eff_n0071`, an EFFECT name, in 8/8, with a per-missile
Route_ADT301..308_p3M at slot 20. Not aimed at a camera.
Left unnamed on purpose: replacing a guessed name with another guess is how
the three names corrected earlier today went wrong.
Also flagged: 115 `named_event`'s only symbol operand is an eff_* name in
84/84 sites, so that name is suspect too. Not renamed pending a handler read.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
All re-read twice — the handler, and the thing it calls — because each had
been named from its shape rather than its effect.
* id 11 `yield` -> `end_coroutine`. 0x82272624 is li r11,1 ; li r3,3 ;
stw r11,164(r31), and the dispatcher's r3==3 arm erases the thread from
the active list and returns it to the free list. It destroys the thread.
2945 sites game-wide, 372 in Stage 02 — the most-used built-in there was.
* id 5 `await_label` -> `kill_coroutine(label)`. sub_82273B08 kills the
thread parked at the target pc, or itself if the target is its own pc.
It waits for nothing.
* id 100 `push_trigger` -> `reset_phase_threads`. It clears the trigger
container and then frees every thread whose pc differs from the caller's
— the opposite of pushing a trigger. Corroborated by usage: its 12 Stage
02 sites all sit in the phase terminator, next to timer_stop,
clear_flag(-1) and MARK_LAST_PHASE.
One name recovered from the game's own text: opcode 992 prints
"RequestScriptMessage %s" at 0x820A5700, so id 64 is request_script_message
(2683 sites).
Return codes documented properly: 1 = restart the coroutine from its entry
(previously not recorded at all), 3 = terminate. And the blocking set was
wrong in two places — it is 102, 120, 137, 142, 143. Id 97 does NOT block;
its handler ends `b 0x822724F8`, so it always returns 0.
Unit-operand resolution settled from DATA over all 28 stages rather than by
reading 147 handlers: a slot qualifies only if every value is a valid
symtab-2 index, it takes >=15 distinct values, AND its maximum reaches most
of the table — that last clause is what discriminates, since every small
integer is trivially "in range". 31 built-ins at slot 4, 8 at slot 12, one
at slot 20. It also refutes set_flag's slot 0, whose maximum overruns the
table, and the resolver now declines rather than inventing a name.
New and unexplained: symtab-2 holds two types, 2 and 8, and built-ins 95 and
128 take type 8 at slot 12 in 100% of their sites.
A downstream inference is withdrawn with it: the note reading the live
trigger counter attributed it to "the script arming watches as it goes" via
built-in 100. The measurement stands; the attribution does not.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
