The record table gives a DIRECT binding hokyu_DS_s13A -> VOICE_D_452, where
the corpus records the movie as unbound and movie_manifest_disc.rs asserts
None, citing an in-game verdict that this exact value was "the wrong
recording". That is the only place on the disc where a runtime observation
disagrees with the record table, so it was worth settling.
First, shape: these banks are SHARED. Five slots bind VOICE_D_452, five bind
451, four 450, four 453, three 454 -- 21 hokyu slots over five banks, and the
movies repeat too. Generic resupply cutscenes, not per-stage recordings.
The recorded explanation for 453 decoding to 0.14 s and 454 to 0.43 s was
that the banks are "likely multi-subwave / not cleanly sliced". Refuted: the
count of RIFF magics EQUALS the number of sub-waves recovered in all five
banks, and the last data chunk ends exactly at EOF in four of them. Nothing
between or after sub-waves is being missed.
The real defect: slb::to_xma_riffs finds audio by searching for the RIFF
magic, and a large region PRECEDES it. 87% of VOICE_D_453 and 85% of
VOICE_D_454 sit in front of the first RIFF -- 21-27% zero over 256 distinct
byte values, i.e. content, not padding. VOICE_D_451 is the control: its
leading region is 100% zero, 1 distinct value, real padding.
So the in-game verdict listened to a decode that had discarded most of the
bank, for exactly this bank class. It is evidence about the decoder, not
about the mapping. Note also that what was rejected was a value INFERRED
from a shared demo id; the record table supplies the same value as a stored
field, and only the inference was ever tested.
This does NOT establish the binding is right -- it removes the only recorded
evidence against it. What the leading region actually holds is undecoded, and
confirming the binding needs a human listening.
Artifact: examples/voice_bank_shape.rs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
49c00e0955