This repository has been archived on 2026-09-16. You can view files and clone it. You cannot open issues or pull requests or push a commit.
Files
Syplheed-Reborn/docs/re
Sylpheed RE agent 49c00e0955 re: the voice decoder discards up to 87% of a bank — "multi-subwave" refuted
The record table gives a DIRECT binding hokyu_DS_s13A -> VOICE_D_452, where
the corpus records the movie as unbound and movie_manifest_disc.rs asserts
None, citing an in-game verdict that this exact value was "the wrong
recording". That is the only place on the disc where a runtime observation
disagrees with the record table, so it was worth settling.

First, shape: these banks are SHARED. Five slots bind VOICE_D_452, five bind
451, four 450, four 453, three 454 -- 21 hokyu slots over five banks, and the
movies repeat too. Generic resupply cutscenes, not per-stage recordings.

The recorded explanation for 453 decoding to 0.14 s and 454 to 0.43 s was
that the banks are "likely multi-subwave / not cleanly sliced". Refuted: the
count of RIFF magics EQUALS the number of sub-waves recovered in all five
banks, and the last data chunk ends exactly at EOF in four of them. Nothing
between or after sub-waves is being missed.

The real defect: slb::to_xma_riffs finds audio by searching for the RIFF
magic, and a large region PRECEDES it. 87% of VOICE_D_453 and 85% of
VOICE_D_454 sit in front of the first RIFF -- 21-27% zero over 256 distinct
byte values, i.e. content, not padding. VOICE_D_451 is the control: its
leading region is 100% zero, 1 distinct value, real padding.

So the in-game verdict listened to a decode that had discarded most of the
bank, for exactly this bank class. It is evidence about the decoder, not
about the mapping. Note also that what was rejected was a value INFERRED
from a shared demo id; the record table supplies the same value as a stored
field, and only the inference was ever tested.

This does NOT establish the binding is right -- it removes the only recorded
evidence against it. What the leading region actually holds is undecoded, and
confirming the binding needs a human listening.

Artifact: examples/voice_bank_shape.rs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMRJjbxLqZtsb5Vb7KunPE
2026-08-25 23:03:33 +00:00
..

Reverse-engineering knowledge base

This directory is the spec-side of the clean-room: it records what the original Project Sylpheed binary does (behaviour) and how its data is laid out, so that the Rust port can be implemented from these specs without re-deriving anything and without ever copying original code.

It exists to answer one question fast: "do we already know how X works, and how sure are we?"


The one rule that matters

Never document a claim more confidently than the evidence supports, and never paste original code here.

A wrong-but-confident note is worse than no note: someone builds on it and the bug hides for weeks. Every entry therefore carries an explicit confidence and its evidence. This mirrors the project method — measure the oracle, never infer; refute before believing.

Clean-room firewall

  • Allowed: behaviour descriptions, field offsets/types, formulas, state machines, observed input→output pairs, and references to the original by address (sub_821B68C0) or to xenia-rs/sylpheed.db.
  • Forbidden here and in crates/: pasted decompiled C/C++ or verbatim disassembled function bodies presented as the thing to reimplement. Cite the address; describe the behaviour in your own words. Disassembly is a tool for understanding, not a source to copy.

Confidence levels

Level Meaning Bar to reach it
CONFIRMED Behaviour verified against ground truth. ≥2 independent observations or one observation cross-checked against an oracle (canary framebuffer, a known-correct value, a second code path).
PROBABLE Strong single-source inference. One clean observation, or an unambiguous static read of the disassembly.
HYPOTHESIS Educated guess, not yet tested. Anything else. Must say what would confirm/refute it.

Promotion requires new evidence, not re-reading the old evidence. A HYPOTHESIS that "looks right again" is still a HYPOTHESIS. Only an independent check promotes it. If evidence later contradicts an entry, demote it and record the contradiction — do not silently edit the conclusion.


When to document

  • Right after a function/structure crosses from HYPOTHESIS to at least PROBABLE — before moving to the next code path, so the knowledge isn't lost or re-derived.
  • Whenever confidence changes (up or down) — append to the Evidence log, don't overwrite.
  • Not while it's still a pure guess with no evidence — a one-liner in the relevant backlog/plan is enough until there's something to stand on.

What to document

  • Functions/code pathsdocs/re/functions/<name>.md (one file per function or tight cluster).
  • Data structures / formatsdocs/re/structures/<name>.md.
  • Keep the index in INDEX.md (one line each: name · confidence · one-line summary).

Use the templates: _TEMPLATE.function.md, _TEMPLATE.structure.md.


How we find and confirm code paths (the toolchain)

Everything joins on the guest virtual address (PC) — code addresses are fixed by the XEX load, identical across our emulator and canary.

  • Static (cheap, try first): xenia-rs/sylpheed.db (DuckDB: 25 481 functions, xrefs, strings, vtables, imports). Query with xenia-rs/zq.pyzq.py grep <str>, zq.py xref <addr>, zq.py dis <lo> <hi>, zq.py fn <pc>. Entry points are usually a string (zq.py grep MSG_DEMO) or an import (movie/XMA API) xref'd back to the loader.
  • Dynamic (when static is ambiguous): run xenia-rs with its probe suite — --pc-probe / --audit-pc-probe-hex (fires at block entry), --mem-watch (mid-block reads/writes of a VA), --lr-trace (call/return chains), --trace-instructions, --dump-addr (read guest memory). These already exist; prefer them over hacking canary.
  • Oracle (correctness ground truth): canary — the Wine cross-build xenia-canary/build-cross/bin/Windows/Debug/xenia_canary.exe (the native Linux ELF crashes / does not run — do not use it). This is the only emulator that reaches the in-game menu; our xenia-rs never got past the intro video. Use canary to observe output (capture its framebuffer for texture colours), not usually to instrument code — though its build-cross toolchain does compile, so small C++ probes + rebuild are possible when needed. Run muted, one emulator process at a time, point it at the real ISO (not the symlink).

⚠️ VA-equality caveat: join code by PC (fixed), but never assume a data VA holds the same bytes across emulators — allocators differ. Compare data by content/layout.