Claude (auto-RE)
4f6fcf36dc
To separate "a 1 s burst never reaches the steady rate" from "a per-axis
multiplier", measure inside ONE hold: successive 0.25 s windows of a single 3 s
press, holding speed, attitude and starting conditions constant by construction.
rep0 rate 16 59 325 209 130 322 238 110 310 151 183
rep1 rate 52 181 231 246 236 169 368 195 181 255 182
Not usable. At 0.25 s the windows do not contain enough guest updates to average,
so rate and speed both swing 3x window to window -- the same aliasing that once
manufactured a rate-vs-speed curve, reappearing at finer resolution. The first
window is lowest in BOTH repeats, which is what a ramp would look like, but the
sequence never plateaus, so the signal cannot be separated from the sampling. No
claim either way.
Widening the window does not rescue it: 0.5 s averages well enough, but a hold
long enough to contain several 0.5 s windows bleeds speed -- and speed is the
variable under test. The two effects are entangled at this observation rate.
So the residual needs a different INSTRUMENT, not another script. Live-RAM polling
samples an unsynchronised snapshot; the question wants the craft's angular
velocity as the guest computes it, once per frame. That is a Canary-side hook --
the same shape as the existing F10 ship-capture patch -- and the rebuild toolchain
already makes it cheap. Recorded as the recommendation rather than attempted as a
seventh variation of the same measurement.
3.4 KiB
Executable File
3.4 KiB
Executable File