Files
Syplheed-Reborn/docs/re/autopilot-memory-driven.md
Claude (auto-RE) 41c34dc3ca re: surviving is not winning -- Stage 02 is an escort
The second 240 s flight ended on GAME OVER with our hull untouched at
1500/1500. Nothing shot us down; the ACROPOLIS was sunk while the
pilot pursued an attacker two kilometres away. "Nearest hostile
fighter" is the wrong objective function for this stage.

The fix is available with what is already solved: the protected ship's
hull is readable with the same anchor as ours (position+0x154, maximum
= its own definition HP), so target priority can be "closing on the
asset" and the escort can be scored live.

Also records that a frozen log tail is what mission-end looks like
from outside the emulator, not a wedge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 05:43:42 +00:00

300 lines
17 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Memory-driven autopilot — build log and current state
**Status: 🟢 IT FLIES, KILLS AND SURVIVES — but it loses the mission anyway.**
Updated 2026-07-30. `pilot.py` flew Stage 02 for **300 s with the hull untouched
at 1500/1500** and scored the first confirmed autopilot kill (`YOU KILLED
WARPLANES 0001` on the HUD, screenshots `shots/pilot1-*.png`); the scene's
hostile count fell from 134 to 111 over the run. The day before, every run was
dead inside 35 s. What is still missing is the *end* of a mission: the objective
counter (`REMAINING OB`) rises as new waves spawn, and nothing yet tracks which
targets actually close it out — and the second run proved the point the hard
way: `GAME OVER` with the hull at 1500/1500, because Stage 02 is an **escort**
and the ACROPOLIS was sunk while the pilot chased fighters two kilometres away.
## 2026-07-30 — the numbers survival needs
Three things the loop was missing were measured this session, each by
consequence rather than by reading a field and hoping.
### Hull is `position + 0x154` ✅ CONFIRMED
The unit definition already had `HP` solved at `+0x054`
([unit-struct-runtime](structures/unit-struct-runtime.md)); the Delta Saber's is
**1500**. A craft that has taken no damage must therefore *contain that number*,
which turns "find the HP field" into a two-float lookup rather than a value scan
(`own_state.py`). It appears once in the entity object, at `pos+0x154`, and the
trace across a death settles it (`ctrl_probe.py` capture, `binq.py trace`):
```
t phase hull
0.00 base 1500.00 <- == definition HP
23.25 rest_A 1380.00 <- first hit, -120
26.68 … 27.18 B 1320 … 930 <- seven hits in 0.5 s
31.93 X 150.00
35.21 Y -30.00 <- goes negative
35.26 Y -180.00 -> GAME OVER on screen
```
Damage arrives in 30/60/90-point steps and the field goes *negative* at death,
so it is the raw hull counter, not a clamped display value. **1500 hull lost in
12 s** of sitting in a turret's line of fire is the whole reason every earlier
run died.
### Shield is `position + 0x430` 🟡 PROBABLE — not yet confirmed live
Same anchor trick: the definition's shield `MaxValue` is **400** and
`ChargeSpeed` **25**, and the entity object holds `400.0` at `+0x430`, `+0x434`
and `+0x438`, with `25.0` at `+0x448`. Which of the three is the *current* value
is unproven — the capture that spanned the death used a ±0x400 window and
cropped them out. `ctrl_probe.py` now samples ±0x800.
### `RT` accelerates, `LT` brakes, and the throttle is a *setting* ✅ CONFIRMED
`ctrl_probe.py` holds each input in turn and measures the craft's own speed as
displacement per second from the position triple, so no speed field is needed.
Distance flown / phase duration, one 3 s hold each, sticks neutral:
| phase | speed (units/s) | | phase | speed (units/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| base (no input) | 488 | | A | 287 |
| **RT** | **1510** | | B | 139 |
| rest after RT | 1056 | | X | 125 |
| **LT** | **174** | | Y | (dying) |
| rest after LT | 428 | | LB / LS / RS / RY / RX / dpad | no effect |
RT triples the speed, LT cuts it to a third, and **the braked state persists**:
after the LT phase the craft sat at 125140 units/s with the sticks and triggers
neutral for the remaining 40 s, and nothing but RT brought it back. So these are
a throttle setting, not a momentary boost — which also means a control loop must
send only the *changes*.
This **corrects** the earlier note in this file ("`RT` is *not* the throttle,
and no button tested is"). That conclusion came from `findspeed.py`, which
assumed the control and went looking for a *field* that rose; measuring the
speed directly reverses it.
### Two method corrections
* **Pick the attitude block by the flight path, not by address order.** The
player object contains **20** orthonormal 3×3 blocks (identity frames, bone
or camera frames), and `pos-0x70` and `pos-0x30` hold the *same* matrix.
Taking `found[0]` wrote a config with `rot_delta = -0x764` and a nonsense
forward axis; `entities2.py self` now scores every block against the measured
direction of travel and picks the best (`cos = +1.000`, row 2, sign +1).
* **The entity-heap scan has to be numpy.** A per-word Python loop over the
16 MB entity region costs seconds per scan, which is the whole budget of a
10 Hz control loop; `np.isin` over a `>u4` view is milliseconds.
### Stage 02 as an autopilot testbed (from the in-flight HUD)
`OBJECTIVE: shoot down all invading enemy fighters while watching out for
attacks on the ACROPOLIS` · `DEFEAT: your fighter is shot down, or the ACROPOLIS
is sunk` · `HINT: you can resupply at the ACROPOLIS`. The HUD shows
**`REMAINING OB 004`** — only four objective targets — so this mission is
winnable by an autopilot that survives. It also shows separate **SHIELD** and
**ARMOR** bars (matching a 400-point shield over 1500 hull), `A/B 7,635`
afterburner, and `NOSE BM 06000` / `MAIN MPM 00300` ammo.
## What the loop did before that, observed
```
[ 82.5] tgt=e007_ADAN_Turret d=3384 yaw= -7.3 pit=+14.6 stick=(-0.13,-0.34) fire=0
[ 85.7] tgt=e007_ADAN_Turret d=2797 yaw= +1.9 pit=+27.2 stick=(+0.20,-0.59) fire=0
[117.3] tgt=e007_ADAN_Turret d=4211 yaw= +5.7 pit= +9.0 stick=(+0.25,-0.40) fire=1
```
Distance closes monotonically, yaw error is driven from 8° to ~0, and once both
errors are inside the firing cone it holds RB and the ammo counter falls. A
rescan reports the scene as e.g. `136 entities {'TCAF': 16, 'ADAN': 120}`.
**The chain that made it work** — each link checked, not assumed:
1. **Entity typing.** A live entity's definition pointer sits at
**position + 0x130**. One heap scan then yields every craft *with its unit
type*, which is what separates 20-odd real combatants from ~30 000 moving
particles. Verified by the result being coherent: wingmen, enemy turrets and
attackers, friendly capital ships, and exactly one `…_Player`.
2. **Orientation.** A 3×3 rotation at **position 0x70**, stored with a
**16-byte row stride** (a 4×4 transform whose translation row *is* the
position). An earlier search for nine *contiguous* floats structurally could
not find this, which is why the first pass concluded "no transform". The
binding is confirmed independently: its row 2 matches the craft's measured
direction of travel with **cos = +1.000**.
3. **The fire button is RB** — established by consequence, not by guessing:
of RB/LB/A/B/X/Y/RT/LT, pressing RB is the only one that makes the nose-ammo
counter in RAM fall (5958 → 5940). (This entry also claimed `RT` is *not* the
throttle — **wrong**, see the 2026-07-30 measurement above.)
4. **Control.** PD on the aiming error with the derivative taken from the
craft's own body angular velocity (from two consecutive rotation matrices),
and target selection weighted by off-boresight angle
(`score = d·(1 + 3·(θ/π)²)`) rather than pure nearest — closing on a target
90° off the nose only raises the bearing rate, which is what held the first
run outside its firing cone at a steady ~27° pitch error.
## Goal
Fly and fight a mission by reading the game's own world state out of guest RAM
and driving the pad from it — the RE payoff being an oracle for the
reimplementation's flight model and AI, and a way to reach missions the save
cannot otherwise reach (unit coverage for
[unit-struct-runtime](structures/unit-struct-runtime.md) is capped at 21/110
because definitions load **per stage**).
## What works (verified)
| Piece | Tool | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Live guest-RAM reads at loop rate | `gworld.py` | `/dev/shm` file opened once, `pread` per tick; a whole-RAM scan is ~6 s, a targeted read is microseconds |
| Whole-RAM float scanning | numpy over `SEEK_DATA` extents | 1 270 orthonormal 3×3 blocks located in 6.2 s |
| Entity enumeration by unit type | `gworld.py entities` | 116 live instances in Stage 02, typed by unit ID, incl. exactly one `…_Player` |
| Pad control at loop rate | `flight_probe.Pad` | writes command lines straight into the vgamepad FIFO; the `vgamepad` CLI spawns a process per command and its `tap`/`hold` sleep *inside* the server, so neither is usable in a control loop |
| Unattended mission entry | `launch_mission.sh` | title → LOAD GAME → slot 01 → READY ROOM → TAKE OFF → in flight, repeatable |
| Hangar loadout | `launch_mission.sh --hangar` | the "Recommended" control is **AUTO SELECT — "Mount most suitable weapons"**, already the default cursor position. At 5 % progress it is a no-op: only two weapons are developed, and they are already mounted |
| Finding moving objects | `findplayer.py` | position triples recovered from motion alone — straight-line, constant-speed filter over K whole-RAM samples |
## What is NOT solved
**Survival, and therefore mission completion.** The loop has no evasion, no
shield/armour awareness and no throttle control, so it flies a straight pursuit
into defended space and is eventually shot down — every long run so far has
ended in GAME OVER. Completing a mission needs, at least: reading own
shield/armour, breaking off when hit, and prioritising the mission's actual
objective targets over the nearest turret.
### Superseded (kept because the reasoning still matters)
The notes below were written before the chain above worked. They remain true as
statements about `0x820af030`, which is *not* the live entity —
1. **The `0x820af030` class is not the live entity.** It has one object per
spawned thing and carries the unit-ID string, so it looked like the entity
list — but over a 29 s in-flight capture **all 384 words of it are
constant** (`whatchanges.py`). It is a static spawn record. The earlier
claim in `unit-struct-runtime.md` that this class is "the spawned entity
instance — live state" is **wrong in the second half**: it is per-spawn, but
it is not live state. The parts of that document that depend on the
*definition* class `0x820af844` are unaffected.
2. **No transform in or one hop from that object**: no orthonormal 3×3, and no
unit quaternion, within `0x2000` of it or behind any of its 121 pointers.
3. **Input correlation finds *a* self-object, but not obviously the craft.**
Holding hard-left then hard-right yaw and looking for a position whose turn
axis reverses (`findself.py`, `selfstate.py`) gives clean hits
(`cos ≈ 0.99`), but they cluster at `0x40009xxx` in what looks like an
8-corner box with ±45 000 coordinates — a camera/skybox volume that follows
the player, not the craft. Its speed (≈359/s) is suspiciously close to the
HUD's 350, which supports "follows the player" but is not proof of identity.
4. **Entity typing is unavailable**: no definition pointer within ±0x800 of the
self-position, so the trick of learning one object's layout and applying it
to all the others has nothing to anchor on. Without typing, the 33 418
moving triples in a firefight cannot be separated into enemies, friendlies
and bullets, so there is nothing to aim at.
## Dead ends, recorded so they are not re-run
* **Speed-scan for the player object** (`findspeed.py`, the classic two-state
value scan: coast → boost → coast). Sound method, but **`RT` is not the
throttle** — 5 864 floats matched the cruise speed and none rose. The control
actually bound to acceleration was never established, and the run that would
have established it ended in GAME OVER.
* **Comparing orientation matrices 2 s apart.** At a real turn rate that is far
outside the small-angle regime, so the skew part of `A·Bᵀ` is not the rotation
vector and the "angular velocity" comes out as ~30 000. Sample incrementally
(6 Hz) and re-check orthonormality on every read — blocks found by a scan get
overwritten between the scan and the read.
## The second run lost the mission **without being hit** (2026-07-30)
A second 240 s flight, with the two fixes above, ended on the `GAME OVER`
screen — while the hull read **1500/1500 on the last live tick**. Nothing shot
us down. The other defeat condition fired: *the ACROPOLIS is sunk*. The HUD had
been showing a red `WARNING` banner for a while, and the pilot spent the whole
run pursuing an `e010_ADAN_Attacker_S` two kilometres away.
So surviving is necessary and not sufficient, and "nearest hostile fighter" is
the wrong objective function for this stage. **The mission is an escort.** What
follows:
* **Prioritise hostiles by their distance to the protected asset, not to us.**
The attackers worth killing are the ones closing on the ACROPOLIS.
* **The protected asset's health is readable with the same anchor as ours** —
hull at `position + 0x154`, its maximum being its own definition's `HP`. That
gives a live "are we winning" signal for the escort, and it should drive the
target choice directly.
* A frozen tail in the log (identical position, speed and target for the last
five seconds) is what mission-end looks like from the outside, **not** an
emulator wedge. Worth knowing before diagnosing the wrong thing.
* Practical: do **not** pipe a long run's log through `tail` — that discards
everything but the end, and the interesting part of this run is gone.
## After survival, the blocker is lethality (2026-07-30)
The 300 s run took **no damage at all** and killed **one** warplane, spending
~800 rounds of nose ammo (`06000``05193`) to do it, while `REMAINING OB` rose
from `004` to `011` as fresh waves spawned. So attrition at this rate never
finishes the mission, and the ranking of open problems has changed:
1. **Hit rate.** It opens fire at 25 km with a 9° cone and a crude lead
(`p + v·d/speed`, no projectile speed). The `Shell` records in
[weapon-struct-runtime](structures/weapon-struct-runtime.md) carry the real
projectile speed and `MaximumRange` per weapon — the lead and the firing
range should come from *those*, not from constants.
2. **Which targets count.** `REMAINING OB` is the mission's own objective
counter and it is on screen, so it is in RAM; finding it turns "shoot
whatever is nearest" into "shoot what closes the mission". Objective-marked
entities also draw an `OB` badge in the HUD, so the flag is likely a word in
the entity object.
3. **Confirming the shield word** — needs a run that actually takes damage; the
pilot is now good enough at avoiding that to make it awkward, so drive
straight at a turret on purpose with `--dry` steering disabled.
4. **Does the ACROPOLIS repair?** RETIRE mode has never triggered (the hull
never fell), so the resupply hint is still untested.
## The next step that unblocks the most (superseded — kept for the reasoning)
**Update 2026-07-30: this is no longer the blocker.** Entity typing via the
definition pointer already solved target selection, so the game's own target
pointer is now a convenience rather than a prerequisite. It would still be the
cheapest route to problem 2 above (objective targets), because whatever the HUD
locks on to is what the game itself considers a target.
**Find the game's own target pointer instead of typing entities ourselves.**
The HUD has a lock-on system (a `TARGET` marker and a target-cycle button), so
a global almost certainly holds a pointer to the currently-targeted entity.
Reading that gives an enemy's live object address directly — which yields both
target selection *and* the entity layout (position offset within it), i.e. it
collapses problems 3 and 4 into one. It is also cheap to find: cycle the target
with the pad and watch which pointer-shaped global changes in step.
## Operational notes
* An unattended craft **dies** — the ship flies straight into a firefight, and
two long scans were invalidated by a GAME OVER mid-run. Any scan longer than
~30 s needs either a survivable holding pattern or a fresh mission.
* `Xvfb` and the emulator die on their own every few minutes here, cleanly
(exit 0), cause unidentified. Everything that must not be interrupted is run
as **one background task** that starts the display, the emulator, the
navigation and the measurement together, so nothing has to survive between
tool calls.
* `pgrep` cannot be used for liveness in this container: PID 1 is
`sleep infinity` and never reaps, so dead processes linger as `<defunct>` and
still match by name. Use `ps -o stat=` and skip `Z`, or `xdpyinfo` for X.
* numpy is not installed system-wide; `pip install --break-system-packages
numpy` puts it in `/sylph-home/.local`, which is only on `sys.path` when
`HOME=/sylph-home`. Scripts run with `HOME=/sylph-home/re` need
`PYTHONPATH=/sylph-home/.local/lib/python3.12/site-packages`.
## Files
`pilot.py` (**the survival loop**) · `ctrl_probe.py` (input → speed calibration,
plus a per-tick window of the player object) · `binq.py` (query that capture) ·
`own_state.py` (definition-anchored hull/shield lookup) · `fly_session.sh`
(boot → mission → bind → fly, one task) · `wait_flight.sh` (wait for the real
HUD instead of a fixed sleep) · `navigator.py` (drift-aware steering + CPA
avoidance, reused by the pilot) ·
`gworld.py` (live reader + entity list) · `flight_probe.py` (scripted inputs +
sampling, and the `Pad` FIFO client) · `flight_analyze.py` · `whatchanges.py`
(encoding-agnostic "which words are live") · `findplayer.py` · `findself.py` ·
`findrot_global.py` · `findspeed.py` · `liveents.py` · `selfstate.py` (the
whole chain → JSON) · `autopilot2.py` (PD controller; **untested — it has never
had a valid config to run against**) · `launch_mission.sh`.